Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BOSC vs CLFD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
BOSC vs CLFD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $27M | $519M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $48M | $136M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $-9M |
| Gross Margin | 23.7% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | 1.4% |
| Forward P/E | 11.9x | 72.1x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $9M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $21M |
BOSC vs CLFD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| B.O.S. Better Onlin… (BOSC) | 100 | 230.3 | +130.3% |
| Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) | 100 | 271.1 | +171.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BOSC vs CLFD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BOSC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.57
- 116.1% 10Y total return vs CLFD's 106.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 10.2%, current ratio 2.28x
CLFD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 19.6%, EPS growth 31.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -17.9%
- 19.6% revenue growth vs BOSC's -9.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.6% revenue growth vs BOSC's -9.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 72.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.8% margin vs CLFD's -6.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs CLFD's 1.79 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.5% vs CLFD's +20.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.5% ROA vs CLFD's -3.0%, ROIC 10.1% vs 0.6% |
BOSC vs CLFD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BOSC vs CLFD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOSC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLFD is the larger business by revenue, generating $136M annually — 2.8x BOSC's $48M. BOSC is the more profitable business, keeping 6.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLFD's -6.3%. On growth, BOSC holds the edge at +15.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $48M | $136M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | -$9M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $15M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.7% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +1.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | -6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +10.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.9% | -27.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | -142.5% |
Valuation Metrics
BOSC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, BOSC's 8.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CLFD's 61.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $27M | $519M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $26M | $506M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.87x | -64.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 72.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.08x | 61.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.67x | 3.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.28x | 2.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 34.61x | 21.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BOSC leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BOSC delivers a 13.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-3 for CLFD. CLFD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOSC's 0.10x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.0% | -3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.5% | -3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.1% | +0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.5% | +0.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$13M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $21M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $9M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.84x | 85.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BOSC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BOSC five years ago would be worth $13,862 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,591 for CLFD. Over the past 12 months, BOSC leads with a +23.5% total return vs CLFD's +20.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BOSC at 19.5% vs CLFD's 1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.3% | +27.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.5% | +20.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.8% | +3.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.6% | -4.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +116.1% | +106.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.5% | +1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BOSC and CLFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BOSC is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLFD's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLFD currently trades 80.2% from its 52-week high vs BOSC's 68.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.72 | $46.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.62 | $24.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.9% | +80.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.4 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 55K | 146K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $43.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% |
BOSC leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
BOSC vs CLFD: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BOSC or CLFD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) is the stronger pick with 19. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 6% for B. O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC). B. O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BOSC or CLFD?
Over the past 5 years, B.
O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) delivered a total return of +38. 6%, compared to -4. 1% for Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BOSC returned +116. 1% versus CLFD's +106. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BOSC or CLFD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), B.
O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus Clearfield, Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning CLFD is approximately 215% more volatile than BOSC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 10% for B. O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BOSC or CLFD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) is pulling ahead at 19. 6% versus -9. 6% for B. O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Clearfield, Inc. grew EPS 31. 8% year-over-year, compared to 14. 7% for B. O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BOSC leads at 5. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BOSC or CLFD?
B.
O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 8% net margin versus -5. 4% for Clearfield, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BOSC leads at 6. 5% versus 1. 4% for CLFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLFD leads at 33. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BOSC or CLFD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is BOSC or CLFD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, B.
O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57), +116. 1% 10Y return). Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BOSC: +116. 1%, CLFD: +106. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BOSC and CLFD?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BOSC is a small-cap deep-value stock; CLFD is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.