Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BOSC vs RFIL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
BOSC vs RFIL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $26M | $165M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $48M | $80M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $270K |
| Gross Margin | 23.7% | 32.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | 3.4% |
| Forward P/E | 11.7x | 26.3x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $27M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $5M |
BOSC vs RFIL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| B.O.S. Better Onlin… (BOSC) | 100 | 226.4 | +126.4% |
| RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) | 100 | 275.2 | +175.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BOSC vs RFIL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BOSC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.55
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, Low D/E 10.2%, current ratio 2.28x
- Beta 0.55, current ratio 2.28x
RFIL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 24.3%, EPS growth 101.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.9%
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs BOSC's 112.4%
- 24.3% revenue growth vs BOSC's -9.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.3% revenue growth vs BOSC's -9.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.7x vs 26.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.8% margin vs RFIL's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs RFIL's 2.11, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +284.9% vs BOSC's +18.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.5% ROA vs RFIL's 0.4%, ROIC 10.1% vs 3.6% |
BOSC vs RFIL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BOSC vs RFIL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BOSC and RFIL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RFIL is the larger business by revenue, generating $80M annually — 1.7x BOSC's $48M. BOSC is the more profitable business, keeping 6.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RFIL's 0.3%. On growth, BOSC holds the edge at +15.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $48M | $80M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $5M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | $270,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.7% | +32.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +3.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +0.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.9% | -1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BOSC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.7x trailing earnings, BOSC trades at a 99% valuation discount to RFIL's 2182.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BOSC's 7.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RFIL's 35.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $26M | $165M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25M | $187M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.67x | 2182.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 26.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.93x | 35.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.66x | 2.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.26x | 4.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 34.01x | 38.04x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BOSC leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BOSC delivers a 13.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $1 for RFIL. BOSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RFIL's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RFIL scores 8/9 vs BOSC's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.0% | +0.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.5% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.1% | +3.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.5% | +5.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $27M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.84x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RFIL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RFIL five years ago would be worth $23,875 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,444 for BOSC. Over the past 12 months, RFIL leads with a +284.9% total return vs BOSC's +18.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RFIL at 56.6% vs BOSC's 18.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.0% | +169.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.5% | +284.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.9% | +283.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.4% | +138.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +112.4% | +561.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.9% | +56.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BOSC and RFIL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BOSC is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RFIL's 2.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RFIL currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs BOSC's 67.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | 2.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.72 | $15.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.62 | $3.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.7% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.7 | 61.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 55K | 247K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BOSC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). RFIL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
BOSC vs RFIL: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BOSC or RFIL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, RF Industries, Ltd.
(RFIL) is the stronger pick with 24. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 6% for B. O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC). B. O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BOSC or RFIL?
On trailing P/E, B.
O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) is the cheapest at 11. 7x versus RF Industries, Ltd. at 2182. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BOSC or RFIL?
Over the past 5 years, RF Industries, Ltd.
(RFIL) delivered a total return of +138. 7%, compared to +44. 4% for B. O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RFIL returned +561. 0% versus BOSC's +112. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BOSC or RFIL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), B.
O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus RF Industries, Ltd. 's 2. 11β — meaning RFIL is approximately 287% more volatile than BOSC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, B. O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 76% for RF Industries, Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BOSC or RFIL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), RF Industries, Ltd.
(RFIL) is pulling ahead at 24. 3% versus -9. 6% for B. O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RF Industries, Ltd. grew EPS 101. 1% year-over-year, compared to 14. 7% for B. O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BOSC leads at 5. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BOSC or RFIL?
B.
O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 8% net margin versus 0. 1% for RF Industries, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BOSC leads at 6. 5% versus 3. 5% for RFIL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RFIL leads at 30. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — BOSC or RFIL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is BOSC or RFIL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, B.
O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 55), +112. 4% 10Y return). RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BOSC: +112. 4%, RFIL: +561. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BOSC and RFIL?
These companies operate in different sectors (BOSC (Technology) and RFIL (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BOSC is a small-cap deep-value stock; RFIL is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.