BOSC
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd.
Communication Equipment
Market Cap$27M
5Y Perf.+130.3%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
BOSC vs CLFD vs CCOI vs RFIL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CLFD
Clearfield, Inc.
Communication Equipment
Market Cap$519M
5Y Perf.+171.1%
CCOI
Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$817M
5Y Perf.-78.7%
RFIL
RF Industries, Ltd.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$161M
5Y Perf.+168.5%
BOSC vs CLFD vs CCOI vs RFIL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | BOSC | CLFD | CCOI | RFIL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment | Telecommunications Services | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $27M | $519M | $817M | $161M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $48M | $136M | $949M | $80M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $-9M | $-170M | $270K |
| Gross Margin | 23.7% | 37.2% | 32.4% | 32.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | 1.4% | -7.9% | 3.4% |
| Forward P/E | 11.9x | 72.1x | — | 25.7x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $9M | $2.93B | $27M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $21M | $205M | $5M |
BOSC vs CLFD vs CCOI vs RFIL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
BOSC
CLFD
CCOI
RFIL
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| B.O.S. Better Onlin… (BOSC) | 100 | 230.3 | +130.3% |
| Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) | 100 | 271.1 | +171.1% |
| Cogent Communicatio… (CCOI) | 100 | 21.3 | -78.7% |
| RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) | 100 | 268.5 | +168.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BOSC vs CLFD vs CCOI vs RFIL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: BOSC leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. RF Industries, Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. CCOI also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BOSC
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd.
The Defensive Pick
BOSC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 10.2%, current ratio 2.28x
- Beta 0.57, current ratio 2.28x
- Lower P/E (11.9x vs 25.7x)
- 6.8% margin vs CCOI's -17.9%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
CLFD
Clearfield, Inc.
The Quality Angle
CLFD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: technology exposure
CCOI
Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick
CCOI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.67, yield 19.2%
- 19.2% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
RFIL
RF Industries, Ltd.
The Growth Play
RFIL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 24.3%, EPS growth 101.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.9%
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs BOSC's 116.1%
- 24.3% revenue growth vs BOSC's -9.6%
- +275.6% vs CCOI's -65.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | RFIL | 24.3% revenue growth vs BOSC's -9.6% |
| Value | BOSC | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 25.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | BOSC | 6.8% margin vs CCOI's -17.9% |
| Stability / Safety | BOSC | Beta 0.57 vs RFIL's 2.01, lower leverage |
| Dividends | CCOI | 19.2% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | RFIL | +275.6% vs CCOI's -65.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | BOSC | 8.5% ROA vs CCOI's -5.4%, ROIC 10.1% vs -3.1% |
BOSC vs CLFD vs CCOI vs RFIL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2022
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FY 2019
BOSC vs CLFD vs CCOI vs RFIL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLBOSCLAGGINGCCOI
Who Leads Where
BOSC leads in 3 of 6 categories
RFIL leads 1 • CLFD leads 0 • CCOI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓CCOICogent Communications…
0leads
CLFDClearfield, Inc.
0leads
RFILRF Industries, Ltd.
1leads
BOSCB.O.S. Better Online …
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs RFILvs CLFDMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
BOSC3/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
BOSC3/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
BOSC5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
RFIL6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOSC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCOI is the larger business by revenue, generating $949M annually — 19.6x BOSC's $48M. BOSC is the more profitable business, keeping 6.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CCOI's -17.9%. On growth, BOSC holds the edge at +15.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BOSCB.O.S. Better Onl… | CLFDClearfield, Inc. | CCOICogent Communicat… | RFILRF Industries, Lt… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $48M | $136M | $949M | $80M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $6M | $174M | $5M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | -$9M | -$170M | $270,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $15M | -$208M | $4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.7% | +37.2% | +32.4% | +32.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +1.4% | -7.9% | +3.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | -6.3% | -17.9% | +0.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +10.8% | -21.9% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.9% | -27.1% | -3.2% | -1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | -142.5% | +23.9% | +100.0% |
BOSC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
BOSC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.9x trailing earnings, BOSC trades at a 99% valuation discount to RFIL's 2130.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BOSC's 8.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CLFD's 61.5x.
| Metric | BOSCB.O.S. Better Onl… | CLFDClearfield, Inc. | CCOICogent Communicat… | RFILRF Industries, Lt… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $27M | $519M | $817M | $161M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $26M | $506M | $3.5B | $183M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.87x | -64.64x | -4.29x | 2130.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 72.10x | — | 25.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.08x | 61.46x | 21.30x | 34.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.67x | 3.46x | 0.84x | 2.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.28x | 2.05x | — | 4.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 34.61x | 21.01x | — | 37.12x |
BOSC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BOSC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BOSC delivers a 13.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-2 for CCOI. CLFD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RFIL's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RFIL scores 8/9 vs CCOI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | BOSCB.O.S. Better Onl… | CLFDClearfield, Inc. | CCOICogent Communicat… | RFILRF Industries, Lt… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.0% | -3.4% | -2.3% | +0.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.5% | -3.0% | -5.4% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.1% | +0.6% | -3.1% | +3.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.5% | +0.8% | -3.6% | +5.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.03x | — | 0.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$13M | $2.7B | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $21M | $205M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $9M | $2.9B | $27M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.84x | 85.32x | -0.52x | — |
BOSC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RFIL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RFIL five years ago would be worth $23,081 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,236 for CCOI. Over the past 12 months, RFIL leads with a +275.6% total return vs CCOI's -65.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RFIL at 55.3% vs CCOI's -26.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BOSCB.O.S. Better Onl… | CLFDClearfield, Inc. | CCOICogent Communicat… | RFILRF Industries, Lt… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.3% | +27.1% | -20.8% | +162.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.5% | +20.2% | -65.4% | +275.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.8% | +3.9% | -60.0% | +274.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.6% | -4.1% | -57.6% | +130.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +116.1% | +106.7% | +13.1% | +545.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.5% | +1.3% | -26.3% | +55.3% |
RFIL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BOSC and RFIL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BOSC is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RFIL's 2.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RFIL currently trades 96.5% from its 52-week high vs CCOI's 29.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BOSCB.O.S. Better Onl… | CLFDClearfield, Inc. | CCOICogent Communicat… | RFILRF Industries, Lt… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 1.79x | 1.67x | 2.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.72 | $46.76 | $55.24 | $15.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.62 | $24.01 | $14.82 | $3.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.9% | +80.2% | +29.5% | +96.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.4 | 57.1 | 34.3 | 61.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 55K | 146K | 1.2M | 250K |
Evenly matched — BOSC and RFIL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CLFD as "Buy", CCOI as "Hold", RFIL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 68.5% upside for CCOI (target: $28) vs 14.7% for CLFD (target: $43). CCOI is the only dividend payer here at 19.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | BOSCB.O.S. Better Onl… | CLFDClearfield, Inc. | CCOICogent Communicat… | RFILRF Industries, Lt… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $43.00 | $27.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 | 32 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +19.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.13 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% | +2.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
BOSC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). RFIL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallB.O.S. Better Online Soluti… (BOSC)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
BOSC vs CLFD vs CCOI vs RFIL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BOSC or CLFD or CCOI or RFIL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, RF Industries, Ltd.
(RFIL) is the stronger pick with 24. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 6% for B. O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC). B. O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BOSC or CLFD or CCOI or RFIL?
On trailing P/E, B.
O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) is the cheapest at 11. 9x versus RF Industries, Ltd. at 2130. 0x. On forward P/E, RF Industries, Ltd. is actually cheaper at 25. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BOSC or CLFD or CCOI or RFIL?
Over the past 5 years, RF Industries, Ltd.
(RFIL) delivered a total return of +130. 8%, compared to -57. 6% for Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (CCOI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RFIL returned +545. 3% versus CCOI's +13. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BOSC or CLFD or CCOI or RFIL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), B.
O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus RF Industries, Ltd. 's 2. 01β — meaning RFIL is approximately 254% more volatile than BOSC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 76% for RF Industries, Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BOSC or CLFD or CCOI or RFIL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), RF Industries, Ltd.
(RFIL) is pulling ahead at 24. 3% versus -9. 6% for B. O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RF Industries, Ltd. grew EPS 101. 1% year-over-year, compared to 11. 6% for Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CCOI leads at 17. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BOSC or CLFD or CCOI or RFIL?
B.
O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 8% net margin versus -18. 7% for Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BOSC leads at 6. 5% versus -10. 6% for CCOI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLFD leads at 33. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BOSC or CLFD or CCOI or RFIL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, RF Industries, Ltd.
(RFIL) trades at 25. 7x forward P/E versus 72. 1x for Clearfield, Inc. — 46. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CCOI: 68. 5% to $27. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — BOSC or CLFD or CCOI or RFIL?
In this comparison, CCOI (19.
2% yield) pays a dividend. BOSC, CLFD, RFIL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BOSC or CLFD or CCOI or RFIL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, B.
O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57), +116. 1% 10Y return). Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BOSC: +116. 1%, CLFD: +106. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BOSC and CLFD and CCOI and RFIL?
These companies operate in different sectors (BOSC (Technology) and CLFD (Technology) and CCOI (Communication Services) and RFIL (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BOSC is a small-cap deep-value stock; CLFD is a small-cap high-growth stock; CCOI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RFIL is a small-cap high-growth stock. CCOI pays a dividend while BOSC, CLFD, RFIL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 19%
- Dividend Yield > 7.6%
Revenue Growth>
%
(BOSC: 15.9% · CLFD: -27.1%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.