BOSC
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd.
Communication Equipment
Market Cap$27M
5Y Perf.+130.3%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
BOSC vs SGRP vs MMS vs RFIL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SGRP
SPAR Group, Inc.
Specialty Business Services
Market Cap$16M
5Y Perf.-1.0%
MMS
Maximus, Inc.
Specialty Business Services
Market Cap$3.64B
5Y Perf.-7.4%
RFIL
RF Industries, Ltd.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$161M
5Y Perf.+168.5%
BOSC vs SGRP vs MMS vs RFIL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | BOSC | SGRP | MMS | RFIL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Specialty Business Services | Specialty Business Services | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $27M | $16M | $3.64B | $161M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $48M | $147M | $5.32B | $80M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $-22M | $373M | $270K |
| Gross Margin | 23.7% | 20.7% | 24.6% | 32.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | -11.7% | 10.8% | 3.4% |
| Forward P/E | 11.9x | — | 7.8x | 25.7x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $19M | $1.44B | $27M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $18M | $260M | $5M |
BOSC vs SGRP vs MMS vs RFIL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
BOSC
SGRP
MMS
RFIL
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| B.O.S. Better Onlin… (BOSC) | 100 | 230.3 | +130.3% |
| SPAR Group, Inc. (SGRP) | 100 | 99.0 | -1.0% |
| Maximus, Inc. (MMS) | 100 | 92.6 | -7.4% |
| RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) | 100 | 268.5 | +168.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BOSC vs SGRP vs MMS vs RFIL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MMS leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. RF Industries, Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. SGRP also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BOSC
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd.
The Defensive Pick
BOSC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 10.2%, current ratio 2.28x
- Beta 0.57, current ratio 2.28x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
SGRP
SPAR Group, Inc.
The Defensive Choice
SGRP is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.05 vs RFIL's 2.01
Best for: stability
MMS
Maximus, Inc.
The Income Pick
MMS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 1.8%
- Lower P/E (7.8x vs 25.7x)
- 7.0% margin vs SGRP's -14.7%
- 1.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
RFIL
RF Industries, Ltd.
The Growth Play
RFIL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 24.3%, EPS growth 101.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.9%
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs BOSC's 116.1%
- 24.3% revenue growth vs BOSC's -9.6%
- +275.6% vs SGRP's -34.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | RFIL | 24.3% revenue growth vs BOSC's -9.6% |
| Value | MMS | Lower P/E (7.8x vs 25.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | MMS | 7.0% margin vs SGRP's -14.7% |
| Stability / Safety | SGRP | Beta 0.05 vs RFIL's 2.01 |
| Dividends | MMS | 1.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | RFIL | +275.6% vs SGRP's -34.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MMS | 8.8% ROA vs SGRP's -35.0%, ROIC 15.1% vs -1.8% |
BOSC vs SGRP vs MMS vs RFIL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2022
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FY 2019
BOSC vs SGRP vs MMS vs RFIL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLMMSLAGGINGSGRP
Who Leads Where
MMS leads in 3 of 6 categories
RFIL leads 1 • BOSC leads 0 • SGRP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓SGRPSPAR Group, Inc.
0leads
BOSCB.O.S. Better Online …
0leads
RFILRF Industries, Ltd.
1leads
MMSMaximus, Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs RFILvs BOSCMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
MMS3/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MMS5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
RFIL6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
MMS1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MMS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MMS is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.3B annually — 110.0x BOSC's $48M. MMS is the more profitable business, keeping 7.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SGRP's -14.7%. On growth, BOSC holds the edge at +15.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BOSCB.O.S. Better Onl… | SGRPSPAR Group, Inc. | MMSMaximus, Inc. | RFILRF Industries, Lt… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $48M | $147M | $5.3B | $80M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | -$16M | $645M | $5M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | -$22M | $373M | $270,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$18M | $372M | $4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.7% | +20.7% | +24.6% | +32.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | -11.7% | +10.8% | +3.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | -14.7% | +7.0% | +0.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | -12.0% | +7.0% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.9% | +9.6% | -4.1% | -1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | — | +6.5% | +100.0% |
MMS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SGRP and MMS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.9x trailing earnings, BOSC trades at a 99% valuation discount to RFIL's 2130.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MMS's 6.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RFIL's 34.6x.
| Metric | BOSCB.O.S. Better Onl… | SGRPSPAR Group, Inc. | MMSMaximus, Inc. | RFILRF Industries, Lt… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $27M | $16M | $3.6B | $161M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $26M | $17M | $4.8B | $183M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.87x | -5.25x | 12.10x | 2130.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 7.83x | 25.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.19x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.08x | 14.97x | 6.67x | 34.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.67x | 0.37x | 0.67x | 2.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.28x | 0.67x | 2.31x | 4.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 34.61x | — | 9.93x | 37.12x |
Evenly matched — SGRP and MMS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MMS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MMS delivers a 21.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-130 for SGRP. BOSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MMS's 0.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MMS scores 8/9 vs SGRP's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | BOSCB.O.S. Better Onl… | SGRPSPAR Group, Inc. | MMSMaximus, Inc. | RFILRF Industries, Lt… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.0% | -130.0% | +21.8% | +0.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.5% | -35.0% | +8.8% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.1% | -1.8% | +15.1% | +3.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.5% | -2.8% | +17.4% | +5.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.78x | 0.86x | 0.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $712,000 | $1.2B | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $18M | $260M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $19M | $1.4B | $27M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.84x | -7.80x | 4.93x | — |
MMS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RFIL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RFIL five years ago would be worth $23,081 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,113 for SGRP. Over the past 12 months, RFIL leads with a +275.6% total return vs SGRP's -34.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RFIL at 55.3% vs SGRP's -12.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BOSCB.O.S. Better Onl… | SGRPSPAR Group, Inc. | MMSMaximus, Inc. | RFILRF Industries, Lt… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.3% | -23.3% | -22.5% | +162.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.5% | -34.4% | +1.1% | +275.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.8% | -32.4% | -11.6% | +274.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.6% | -58.9% | -20.4% | +130.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +116.1% | -28.9% | +39.7% | +545.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.5% | -12.2% | -4.0% | +55.3% |
RFIL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SGRP and RFIL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SGRP is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RFIL's 2.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RFIL currently trades 96.5% from its 52-week high vs SGRP's 48.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BOSCB.O.S. Better Onl… | SGRPSPAR Group, Inc. | MMSMaximus, Inc. | RFILRF Industries, Lt… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 0.05x | 0.72x | 2.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.72 | $1.41 | $100.00 | $15.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.62 | $0.50 | $60.75 | $3.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.9% | +48.4% | +66.7% | +96.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.4 | 63.6 | 35.0 | 61.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 55K | 55K | 683K | 250K |
Evenly matched — SGRP and RFIL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
MMS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MMS as "Buy", RFIL as "Buy". MMS is the only dividend payer here at 1.78% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | BOSCB.O.S. Better Onl… | SGRPSPAR Group, Inc. | MMSMaximus, Inc. | RFILRF Industries, Lt… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $110.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 16 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.19 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +11.1% | +12.3% | 0.0% |
MMS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
MMS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RFIL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallMaximus, Inc. (MMS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
BOSC vs SGRP vs MMS vs RFIL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BOSC or SGRP or MMS or RFIL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, RF Industries, Ltd.
(RFIL) is the stronger pick with 24. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 6% for B. O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC). B. O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Maximus, Inc. (MMS) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BOSC or SGRP or MMS or RFIL?
On trailing P/E, B.
O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) is the cheapest at 11. 9x versus RF Industries, Ltd. at 2130. 0x. On forward P/E, Maximus, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BOSC or SGRP or MMS or RFIL?
Over the past 5 years, RF Industries, Ltd.
(RFIL) delivered a total return of +130. 8%, compared to -58. 9% for SPAR Group, Inc. (SGRP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RFIL returned +545. 3% versus SGRP's -28. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BOSC or SGRP or MMS or RFIL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SPAR Group, Inc.
(SGRP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus RF Industries, Ltd. 's 2. 01β — meaning RFIL is approximately 3721% more volatile than SGRP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, B. O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 86% for Maximus, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BOSC or SGRP or MMS or RFIL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), RF Industries, Ltd.
(RFIL) is pulling ahead at 24. 3% versus -9. 6% for B. O. S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RF Industries, Ltd. grew EPS 101. 1% year-over-year, compared to -181. 3% for SPAR Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BOSC leads at 5. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BOSC or SGRP or MMS or RFIL?
Maximus, Inc.
(MMS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 9% net margin versus -9. 0% for SPAR Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MMS leads at 10. 6% versus -2. 2% for SGRP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RFIL leads at 30. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BOSC or SGRP or MMS or RFIL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Maximus, Inc.
(MMS) trades at 7. 8x forward P/E versus 25. 7x for RF Industries, Ltd. — 17. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — BOSC or SGRP or MMS or RFIL?
In this comparison, MMS (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. BOSC, SGRP, RFIL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BOSC or SGRP or MMS or RFIL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SPAR Group, Inc.
(SGRP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05)). RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) carries a higher beta of 2. 01 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SGRP: -28. 9%, RFIL: +545. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BOSC and SGRP and MMS and RFIL?
These companies operate in different sectors (BOSC (Technology) and SGRP (Industrials) and MMS (Industrials) and RFIL (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BOSC is a small-cap deep-value stock; SGRP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MMS is a small-cap deep-value stock; RFIL is a small-cap high-growth stock. MMS pays a dividend while BOSC, SGRP, RFIL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(BOSC: 15.9% · SGRP: 9.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.