Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
BOTJ logo
BOTJ
CARE logo
CARE
MNSB logo
MNSB
NKSH logo
NKSH
FXNC logo
FXNC
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BOTJ vs CARE vs MNSB vs NKSH vs FXNC vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BOTJ
Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$112M
5Y Perf.+188.2%
CARE
Carter Bankshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$662M
5Y Perf.+270.2%
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$184M
5Y Perf.+88.9%
NKSH
National Bankshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$231M
5Y Perf.+27.0%
FXNC
First National Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$273M
5Y Perf.+117.5%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%

BOTJ vs CARE vs MNSB vs NKSH vs FXNC vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BOTJ logoBOTJ
CARE logoCARE
MNSB logoMNSB
NKSH logoNKSH
FXNC logoFXNC
KO logoKO
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$112M$662M$184M$231M$273M$355.61B
Revenue (TTM)$62M$252M$135M$85M$115M$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$9M$31M$16M$16M$18M$13.70B
Gross Margin77.7%61.2%54.3%65.1%74.7%61.7%
Operating Margin18.0%15.9%14.1%22.5%19.0%29.3%
Forward P/E12.4x5.5x11.0x11.3x12.8x25.3x
Total Debt$9M$179M$70M$2M$43M$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$29M$105M$26M$8M$161M$10.27B

BOTJ vs CARE vs MNSB vs NKSH vs FXNC vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BOTJ
CARE
MNSB
NKSH
FXNC
KO
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Bank of the James F… (BOTJ)100288.2+188.2%
Carter Bankshares, … (CARE)100370.2+270.2%
MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB)100188.9+88.9%
National Bankshares… (NKSH)100127.0+27.0%
First National Corp… (FXNC)100217.5+117.5%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BOTJ vs CARE vs MNSB vs NKSH vs FXNC vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BOTJ and KO are tied at the top with 2 categories each (6-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. CARE, NKSH, and FXNC also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BOTJ
Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BOTJ has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 11.0%, current ratio 496.36x
  • PEG 0.90 vs FXNC's 8.59
  • Beta 0.15, yield 1.6%, current ratio 496.36x
  • Lower P/E (12.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.90 vs 2.26
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency
CARE
Carter Bankshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CARE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +79.6% vs KO's +17.2%
Best for: momentum
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
The Financial Play

MNSB doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
NKSH
National Bankshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

NKSH is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.

  • 4.2% yield, vs KO's 2.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: dividends
FXNC
First National Corporation
The Banking Pick

FXNC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 2.0%
  • Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
  • 258.5% 10Y total return vs CARE's 141.7%
  • NIM 3.6% vs NKSH's 2.5%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 27.8% margin vs MNSB's 11.5%
  • 13.1% ROA vs CARE's 0.7%, ROIC 15.8% vs 5.7%
Best for: quality and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFXNC logoFXNC27.1% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4%
ValueBOTJ logoBOTJLower P/E (12.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.90 vs 2.26
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs MNSB's 11.5%
Stability / SafetyBOTJ logoBOTJBeta 0.15 vs NKSH's 0.73
DividendsNKSH logoNKSH4.2% yield, vs KO's 2.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)CARE logoCARE+79.6% vs KO's +17.2%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs CARE's 0.7%, ROIC 15.8% vs 5.7%

BOTJ vs CARE vs MNSB vs NKSH vs FXNC vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BOTJBank of the James Financial Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Community Banking
67.1%$39M
All Other Segments
15.5%$9M
Investment Advisory Services
9.1%$5M
Mortgage
8.3%$5M
CARECarter Bankshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Bank Owned Life Insurance Income
74.0%$2M
Other Revenue
26.0%$532,000
MNSBMainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Core Banking Segment
100.0%$134M
NKSHNational Bankshares, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FXNCFirst National Corporation
FY 2018
Bank Servicing And Deposit Account
41.2%$3M
Credit And Debit Card
29.2%$2M
Financial Service, Wealth Management
21.8%$2M
Financial Service, Other
7.8%$601,000
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

BOTJ vs CARE vs MNSB vs NKSH vs FXNC vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGFXNC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 796.9x BOTJ's $62M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNSB's 11.5%.

MetricBOTJ logoBOTJBank of the James…CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…NKSH logoNKSHNational Bankshar…FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$62M$252M$135M$85M$115M$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$12M$46M$23M$20M$25M$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$9M$31M$16M$16M$18M$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$10M$30M$11M$17M$21M$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+77.7%+61.2%+54.3%+65.1%+74.7%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+18.0%+15.9%+14.1%+22.5%+19.0%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+14.6%+12.5%+11.5%+18.6%+15.4%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.6%+11.9%+7.9%+20.5%+18.2%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+66.7%+8.3%+120.9%+91.7%+7.1%+18.2%
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BOTJ leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 12.4x trailing earnings, BOTJ trades at a 54% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BOTJ offers better value at 0.90x vs NKSH's 140.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricBOTJ logoBOTJBank of the James…CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…NKSH logoNKSHNational Bankshar…FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$112M$662M$184M$231M$273M$355.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$93M$735M$227M$225M$155M$390.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.44x21.34x14.16x14.59x15.40x27.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.5.47x11.03x11.28x12.82x25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x140.16x10.32x2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.44x18.38x11.90x11.74x7.05x26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.80x2.60x1.35x2.71x2.43x7.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.41x1.60x0.87x1.25x1.46x10.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.72x20.81x17.26x15.27x12.99x67.15x
BOTJ leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. NKSH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CARE scores 8/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBOTJ logoBOTJBank of the James…CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…NKSH logoNKSHNational Bankshar…FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.1%+7.6%+7.3%+9.0%+10.0%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.9%+0.7%+0.7%+0.9%+0.9%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.7%+5.7%+5.0%+8.4%+7.7%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.0%+1.5%+6.0%+1.9%+9.9%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9785877
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.11x0.43x0.32x0.01x0.23x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$20M$73M$43M-$6M-$118M$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$29M$105M$26M$8M$161M$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$9M$179M$70M$2M$43M$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.80x0.39x0.31x0.64x0.84x10.70x
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CARE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CARE five years ago would be worth $20,802 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,813 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, CARE leads with a +79.6% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BOTJ at 42.8% vs MNSB's 4.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBOTJ logoBOTJBank of the James…CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…NKSH logoNKSHNational Bankshar…FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+34.6%+54.3%+26.5%+12.3%+24.4%+20.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+75.9%+79.6%+37.2%+42.4%+57.8%+17.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+191.2%+93.9%+13.1%+37.2%+103.7%+47.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+55.8%+108.0%+18.1%+24.3%+71.0%+65.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+155.2%+141.7%+135.4%+54.9%+258.5%+121.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+42.8%+24.7%+4.2%+11.1%+26.8%+13.7%
CARE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CARE and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKSH's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CARE currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs NKSH's 90.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBOTJ logoBOTJBank of the James…CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…NKSH logoNKSHNational Bankshar…FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.15x0.58x0.60x0.73x0.52x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$26.49$29.99$25.17$40.00$30.51$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$13.00$16.14$17.86$24.74$18.31$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+93.5%+99.6%+99.0%+90.8%+99.0%+98.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10072.972.865.355.167.060.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded14K316K45K49K79K12.7M
Evenly matched — CARE and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — NKSH and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CARE as "Hold", MNSB as "Hold", NKSH as "Buy", FXNC as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.2% upside for KO (target: $86) vs -30.4% for FXNC (target: $21). For income investors, NKSH offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs MNSB's 1.60%.

MetricBOTJ logoBOTJBank of the James…CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…NKSH logoNKSHNational Bankshar…FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$28.50$21.00$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts514148
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.6%+1.6%+4.2%+2.0%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00001156
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.40$0.40$1.51$0.61$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.0%+2.4%0.0%+0.1%+0.2%
Evenly matched — NKSH and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BOTJ leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BOTJ vs CARE vs MNSB vs NKSH vs FXNC vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BOTJ or CARE or MNSB or NKSH or FXNC or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. (BOTJ) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BOTJ or CARE or MNSB or NKSH or FXNC or KO?

On trailing P/E, Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.

(BOTJ) is the cheapest at 12. 4x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Carter Bankshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Coca-Cola Company wins at 2. 26x versus National Bankshares, Inc. 's 140. 16x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BOTJ or CARE or MNSB or NKSH or FXNC or KO?

Over the past 5 years, Carter Bankshares, Inc.

(CARE) delivered a total return of +108. 0%, compared to +18. 1% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FXNC returned +258. 5% versus NKSH's +54. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BOTJ or CARE or MNSB or NKSH or FXNC or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus National Bankshares, Inc. 's 0. 73β — meaning NKSH is approximately -462% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BOTJ or CARE or MNSB or NKSH or FXNC or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.

1% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 13. 7% for Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BOTJ or CARE or MNSB or NKSH or FXNC or KO?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BOTJ leads at 77. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BOTJ or CARE or MNSB or NKSH or FXNC or KO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 26x versus National Bankshares, Inc. 's 140. 16x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Carter Bankshares, Inc. (CARE) trades at 5. 5x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 19. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KO: 4. 2% to $86. 13.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BOTJ or CARE or MNSB or NKSH or FXNC or KO?

In this comparison, NKSH (4.

2% yield), KO (2. 5% yield), FXNC (2. 0% yield), BOTJ (1. 6% yield), MNSB (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. CARE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BOTJ or CARE or MNSB or NKSH or FXNC or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, CARE: +141. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BOTJ and CARE and MNSB and NKSH and FXNC and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (BOTJ (Financial Services) and CARE (Financial Services) and MNSB (Financial Services) and NKSH (Financial Services) and FXNC (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BOTJ is a small-cap deep-value stock; CARE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NKSH is a small-cap deep-value stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. BOTJ, MNSB, NKSH, FXNC, KO pay a dividend while CARE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.