Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BOX vs MSFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
BOX vs MSFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $3.70B | $3.13T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.18B | $318.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $101M | $125.22B |
| Gross Margin | 79.2% | 68.3% |
| Operating Margin | 7.1% | 46.8% |
| Forward P/E | 20.0x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $77M | $112.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $375M | $30.24B |
BOX vs MSFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Box, Inc. (BOX) | 100 | 128.6 | +28.6% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 229.7 | +129.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BOX vs MSFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BOX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.49, Low D/E 39.1%, current ratio 1.11x
- Lower P/E (20.0x vs 25.3x)
- Beta 0.49 vs MSFT's 0.89
MSFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
- Rev growth 14.9%, EPS growth 15.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.4%
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs BOX's 121.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.9% revenue growth vs BOX's 8.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.0x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs BOX's 8.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.49 vs MSFT's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs BOX's 0.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -2.1% vs BOX's -17.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.2% ROA vs BOX's 6.3%, ROIC 24.9% vs 64.7% |
BOX vs MSFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BOX vs MSFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $318.3B annually — 270.4x BOX's $1.2B. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOX's 8.6%. On growth, MSFT holds the edge at +18.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $318.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $120M | $192.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $101M | $125.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $350M | $72.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.2% | +68.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +46.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | +39.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.8% | +22.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.4% | +18.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -58.0% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BOX and MSFT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.9x trailing earnings, MSFT trades at a 29% valuation discount to BOX's 43.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MSFT's 19.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BOX's 28.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.7B | $3.13T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $3.21T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 43.55x | 30.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.96x | 25.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.32x | 19.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.15x | 11.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 19.09x | 9.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.57x | 43.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BOX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BOX delivers a 47.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $33 for MSFT. MSFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOX's 0.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BOX scores 7/9 vs MSFT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +47.9% | +33.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.3% | +19.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +64.7% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.2% | +29.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.39x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$298M | $81.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $375M | $30.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $77M | $112.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.68x | 55.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MSFT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MSFT five years ago would be worth $17,246 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,143 for BOX. Over the past 12 months, MSFT leads with a -2.1% total return vs BOX's -17.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSFT at 11.7% vs BOX's -1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.9% | -10.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.0% | -2.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.4% | +39.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.4% | +72.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +121.9% | +787.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.5% | +11.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BOX and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BOX is the less volatile stock with a 0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MSFT's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSFT currently trades 75.8% from its 52-week high vs BOX's 66.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.80 | $555.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.34 | $356.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.2% | +75.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.5 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 32.5M |
Analyst Outlook
MSFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BOX as "Buy" and MSFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 34.9% upside for BOX (target: $35) vs 31.1% for MSFT (target: $552). For income investors, MSFT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.77% vs BOX's 0.40%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.67 | $551.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 81 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 19 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.10 | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.8% | +0.6% |
MSFT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). BOX leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
BOX vs MSFT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BOX or MSFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger pick with 14.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 0% for Box, Inc. (BOX). Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) offers the better valuation at 30. 9x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Box, Inc. (BOX) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BOX or MSFT?
On trailing P/E, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the cheapest at 30.
9x versus Box, Inc. at 43. 6x. On forward P/E, Box, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BOX or MSFT?
Over the past 5 years, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) delivered a total return of +72.
5%, compared to +21. 4% for Box, Inc. (BOX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +787. 7% versus BOX's +121. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BOX or MSFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Box, Inc.
(BOX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 49β versus Microsoft Corporation's 0. 89β — meaning MSFT is approximately 83% more volatile than BOX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 39% for Box, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BOX or MSFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is pulling ahead at 14.
9% versus 8. 0% for Box, Inc. (BOX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Microsoft Corporation grew EPS 15. 6% year-over-year, compared to -56. 6% for Box, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MSFT leads at 12. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BOX or MSFT?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus 8. 6% for Box, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus 7. 1% for BOX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BOX leads at 79. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BOX or MSFT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Box, Inc.
(BOX) trades at 20. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for Microsoft Corporation — 5. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BOX: 34. 9% to $34. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — BOX or MSFT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) offers the highest yield at 0. 8%, versus 0. 4% for Box, Inc. (BOX).
09Is BOX or MSFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 8% yield, +787. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +787. 7%, BOX: +121. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BOX and MSFT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
MSFT pays a dividend while BOX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.