Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Boqii Holding Limited (BQ) vs Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. (WOOF) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | WOOF | -2.2% revenue growth vs BQ's -33.9% |
| Quality / Margins | WOOF | -0.0% net margin vs BQ's -11.0% |
| Stability / Safety | WOOF | Beta 1.03 vs BQ's 1.32 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | WOOF | -5.2% vs BQ's -63.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WOOF | -0.0% ROA vs BQ's -14.8%, ROIC 0.1% vs -18.0% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Boqii is a Chinese pet-focused e-commerce platform that sells food, supplies, and veterinary products to pet owners and small businesses through online and offline channels. It generates revenue primarily from direct product sales — supplemented by online marketing services and its interactive Boqii Community platform — with most income coming from pet product transactions. The company's competitive advantage lies in its integrated ecosystem combining e-commerce with community content, creating a specialized destination for China's growing pet care market.
Petco is a pet health and wellness retailer operating physical stores and veterinary clinics across the U.S. It generates revenue primarily from pet supplies and consumables — about 60% of sales — complemented by services like veterinary care, grooming, and training. The company's competitive advantage lies in its integrated ecosystem of retail, veterinary services, and digital platforms that create a one-stop destination for pet owners.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
WOOF leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Financial Metrics and Valuation Metrics.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
WOOF is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.0B annually — 6.1x BQ's $984M. WOOF is the more profitable business, keeping -0.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BQ's -11.0%.
| Metric | BQBoqii Holding Lim… | WOOFPetco Health and … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $984M | $6.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$96M | $312M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$108M | -$2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.4B | $130M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | +37.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.6% | +1.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.0% | -0.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -142.1% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -3.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +154.0% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BQBoqii Holding Lim… | WOOFPetco Health and … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15M | $96M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17M | $2.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.17x | -6.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.22x | 0.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.04x | 0.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 1.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WOOF delivers a -0.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-0 in annual profit, vs $-37 for BQ. BQ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WOOF's 2.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WOOF scores 5/9 vs BQ's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | BQBoqii Holding Lim… | WOOFPetco Health and … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -37.0% | -0.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -14.8% | -0.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.0% | +0.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -20.4% | +0.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 2.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $11M | $2.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $39M | $166M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $50M | $3.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.26x | 0.83x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in WOOF five years ago would be worth $1,215 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8 for BQ. Over the past 12 months, WOOF leads with a -5.2% total return vs BQ's -63.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WOOF at -37.2% vs BQ's -70.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BQBoqii Holding Lim… | WOOFPetco Health and … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -43.6% | -10.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -63.3% | -5.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | -75.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -87.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -91.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -70.2% | -37.2% |
Risk & Volatility
WOOF is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BQ's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WOOF currently trades 56.5% from its 52-week high vs BQ's 2.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BQBoqii Holding Lim… | WOOFPetco Health and … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $56.10 | $4.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.09 | $2.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.0% | +56.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.9 | 44.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 120K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | BQBoqii Holding Lim… | WOOFPetco Health and … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.99 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 21 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boqii Holding Limit… (BQ) | 100 | 0.07 | -99.9% |
| Petco Health and We… (WOOF) | 86.6 | 9.25 | -89.3% |
Petco Health and We… (WOOF) returned -88% over 5 years vs Boqii Holding Limit… (BQ)'s -100%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boqii Holding Limit… (BQ) | $804M | $469M | -41.7% |
| Petco Health and We… (WOOF) | $4.4B | $6.1B | +39.3% |
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boqii Holding Limit… (BQ) | -29.1% | -11.5% | +60.4% |
| Petco Health and We… (WOOF) | -9.4% | -1.7% | +82.3% |
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boqii Holding Limit… (BQ) | -2,054.25 | -44.85 | +97.8% |
| Petco Health and We… (WOOF) | -0.28 | -0.37 | -32.1% |
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Boqii Holding Limited generated $-70M FCF in 2025 (+72% vs 2021). Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. generated $50M FCF in 2024 (-58% vs 2021).
BQ vs WOOF: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BQ or WOOF a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. (WOOF) a "Hold" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BQ or WOOF?
Over the past 5 years, Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. (WOOF) delivered a total return of -87.9%, compared to -99.9% for Boqii Holding Limited (BQ). A $10,000 investment in WOOF five years ago would be worth approximately $1K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WOOF returned -91.3% versus BQ's -99.9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BQ or WOOF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. (WOOF) is the lower-risk stock at 1.03β versus Boqii Holding Limited's 1.32β — meaning BQ is approximately 29% more volatile than WOOF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Boqii Holding Limited (BQ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 3% for Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — BQ or WOOF?
Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. (WOOF) is the more profitable company, earning -1.7% net margin versus -11.5% for Boqii Holding Limited — meaning it keeps -1.7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WOOF leads at 0.1% versus -12.7% for BQ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WOOF leads at 38.0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — BQ or WOOF?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is BQ or WOOF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. (WOOF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.03)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WOOF: -91.3%, BQ: -99.9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between BQ and WOOF?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.