Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BQ vs WOOF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
BQ vs WOOF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $987K | $752M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $984M | $5.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-108M | $9M |
| Gross Margin | 19.8% | 38.7% |
| Operating Margin | -11.6% | 2.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.8x |
| Total Debt | $50M | $1.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $39M | $257M |
BQ vs WOOF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boqii Holding Limit… (BQ) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Petco Health and We… (WOOF) | 100 | 10.6 | -89.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BQ vs WOOF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BQ is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.11, Low D/E 21.9%, current ratio 4.85x
WOOF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.92
- Rev growth -2.5%, EPS growth 108.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.4%
- -90.6% 10Y total return vs BQ's -99.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -2.5% revenue growth vs BQ's -33.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.2% margin vs BQ's -11.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs BQ's 2.11 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -14.1% vs BQ's -63.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.2% ROA vs BQ's -14.8%, ROIC 2.9% vs -18.0% |
BQ vs WOOF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BQ vs WOOF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WOOF leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WOOF is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.0B annually — 6.1x BQ's $984M. WOOF is the more profitable business, keeping 0.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BQ's -11.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $984M | $6.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$96M | $317M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$108M | $9M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.4B | $286M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | +38.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.6% | +2.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.0% | +0.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -142.1% | +4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +81.6% |
Valuation Metrics
BQ leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $987,418 | $752M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | $1.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.12x | 86.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 5.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 0.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 0.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WOOF leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WOOF delivers a 0.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-37 for BQ. BQ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WOOF's 1.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WOOF scores 7/9 vs BQ's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -37.0% | +0.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -14.8% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.0% | +2.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -20.4% | +3.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 1.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $11M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $39M | $257M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $50M | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.26x | 0.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WOOF leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WOOF five years ago would be worth $1,154 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10 for BQ. Over the past 12 months, WOOF leads with a -14.1% total return vs BQ's -63.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WOOF at -35.4% vs BQ's -76.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -59.5% | -3.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -63.6% | -14.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | -73.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -88.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -90.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -76.8% | -35.4% |
Risk & Volatility
WOOF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WOOF is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BQ's 2.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WOOF currently trades 61.0% from its 52-week high vs BQ's 1.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.11x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $56.10 | $4.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.65 | $2.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.5% | +61.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.7 | 42.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 89K | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.59 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
WOOF leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BQ leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
BQ vs WOOF: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BQ or WOOF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc.
(WOOF) is the stronger pick with -2. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -33. 9% for Boqii Holding Limited (BQ). Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. (WOOF) offers the better valuation at 86. 8x trailing P/E (18. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. (WOOF) a "Hold" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BQ or WOOF?
Over the past 5 years, Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc.
(WOOF) delivered a total return of -88. 5%, compared to -99. 9% for Boqii Holding Limited (BQ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WOOF returned -90. 6% versus BQ's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BQ or WOOF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc.
(WOOF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 92β versus Boqii Holding Limited's 2. 11β — meaning BQ is approximately 129% more volatile than WOOF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Boqii Holding Limited (BQ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 118% for Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BQ or WOOF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc.
(WOOF) is pulling ahead at -2. 5% versus -33. 9% for Boqii Holding Limited (BQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. grew EPS 108. 6% year-over-year, compared to 78. 4% for Boqii Holding Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, WOOF leads at -0. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BQ or WOOF?
Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc.
(WOOF) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 2% net margin versus -11. 5% for Boqii Holding Limited — meaning it keeps 0. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WOOF leads at 2. 0% versus -12. 7% for BQ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WOOF leads at 38. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BQ or WOOF?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is BQ or WOOF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc.
(WOOF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92)). Boqii Holding Limited (BQ) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WOOF: -90. 6%, BQ: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BQ and WOOF?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.