Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BRAG vs PENN vs CZR vs MGM vs WYNN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
BRAG vs PENN vs CZR vs MGM vs WYNN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $56M | $2.24B | $5.66B | $9.75B | $11.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $123M | $6.96B | $11.56B | $17.72B | $7.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-843M | $-485M | $183M | $425M |
| Gross Margin | 49.3% | 30.6% | 43.9% | 44.2% | 28.5% |
| Operating Margin | -4.4% | -7.9% | 17.8% | 5.2% | 15.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 23.0x | — | 22.1x | 20.8x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $8.38B | $26.34B | $56.16B | $12.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $687M | $887M | $2.06B | $1.46B |
BRAG vs PENN vs CZR vs MGM vs WYNN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bragg Gaming Group … (BRAG) | 100 | 83.1 | -16.9% |
| PENN Entertainment,… (PENN) | 100 | 51.1 | -48.9% |
| Caesars Entertainme… (CZR) | 100 | 243.9 | +143.9% |
| MGM Resorts Interna… (MGM) | 100 | 221.8 | +121.8% |
| Wynn Resorts, Limit… (WYNN) | 100 | 128.3 | +28.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BRAG vs PENN vs CZR vs MGM vs WYNN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BRAG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 63.9%, EPS growth -142.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.24, Low D/E 12.1%, current ratio 0.97x
- 63.9% revenue growth vs WYNN's 0.1%
- Beta 0.24 vs PENN's 1.34, lower leverage
PENN plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
CZR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MGM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 81.8% 10Y total return vs CZR's 302.6%
WYNN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.23, yield 1.6%
- Beta 1.23, yield 1.6%, current ratio 1.63x
- Lower P/E (20.8x vs 22.1x)
- 5.8% margin vs PENN's -12.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 63.9% revenue growth vs WYNN's 0.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.8x vs 22.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.8% margin vs PENN's -12.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.24 vs PENN's 1.34, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.2% vs BRAG's -49.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs BRAG's -7.7%, ROIC 9.3% vs -6.3% |
BRAG vs PENN vs CZR vs MGM vs WYNN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BRAG vs PENN vs CZR vs MGM vs WYNN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WYNN leads in 4 of 6 categories
BRAG leads 1 • PENN leads 0 • CZR leads 0 • MGM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WYNN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGM is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.7B annually — 143.7x BRAG's $123M. WYNN is the more profitable business, keeping 5.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PENN's -12.1%. On growth, BRAG holds the edge at +65.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $123M | $7.0B | $11.6B | $17.7B | $7.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $17M | -$105M | $3.5B | $2.0B | $1.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$843M | -$485M | $183M | $425M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $13M | -$169M | $538M | $1.7B | $872M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.3% | +30.6% | +43.9% | +44.2% | +28.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | -7.9% | +17.8% | +5.2% | +15.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.3% | -12.1% | -4.2% | +1.0% | +5.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.3% | -2.4% | +4.7% | +9.8% | +12.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +65.3% | +8.2% | +2.7% | +4.2% | +9.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.0% | +37.5% | +11.1% | -5.9% | +50.7% |
Valuation Metrics
BRAG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 34.0x trailing earnings, WYNN trades at a 32% valuation discount to MGM's 50.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BRAG's 3.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MGM's 31.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $56M | $2.2B | $5.7B | $9.8B | $11.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $58M | $9.9B | $31.1B | $63.8B | $22.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.94x | -2.88x | -11.48x | 50.14x | 34.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.95x | — | 22.10x | 20.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.38x | 13.81x | 8.90x | 31.61x | 12.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.46x | 0.32x | 0.49x | 0.56x | 1.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.76x | 1.33x | 1.57x | 3.08x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.95x | — | 10.88x | 5.85x | 16.10x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WYNN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGM delivers a 5.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-35 for PENN. BRAG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGM's 17.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PENN scores 5/9 vs BRAG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.9% | -34.7% | -12.6% | +5.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.7% | -5.7% | -1.5% | +0.4% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.3% | +1.8% | +5.4% | +1.7% | +9.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.0% | +2.0% | +7.0% | +2.6% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 4.58x | 7.15x | 17.14x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $7.7B | $25.5B | $54.1B | $10.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $687M | $887M | $2.1B | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $8.4B | $26.3B | $56.2B | $12.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.79x | -1.02x | 0.90x | 1.52x | 2.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WYNN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MGM five years ago would be worth $9,551 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,484 for BRAG. Over the past 12 months, WYNN leads with a +28.2% total return vs BRAG's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WYNN at -0.9% vs BRAG's -16.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.2% | +12.9% | +17.9% | +4.4% | -12.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -49.4% | +6.7% | +2.5% | +20.1% | +28.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.6% | -35.3% | -38.6% | -12.3% | -2.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.2% | -80.6% | -73.7% | -4.5% | -13.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.8% | +11.9% | +302.6% | +81.8% | +34.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.0% | -13.5% | -15.0% | -4.3% | -0.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BRAG and MGM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BRAG is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PENN's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MGM currently trades 93.1% from its 52-week high vs BRAG's 46.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.24x | 1.34x | 1.27x | 1.28x | 1.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.82 | $20.61 | $31.58 | $40.94 | $134.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.46 | $11.65 | $17.95 | $29.19 | $82.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.1% | +81.4% | +88.0% | +93.1% | +79.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.9 | 55.1 | 54.5 | 50.0 | 55.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 27K | 4.4M | 4.6M | 4.4M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
WYNN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PENN as "Buy", CZR as "Buy", MGM as "Buy", WYNN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.8% upside for WYNN (target: $143) vs 4.2% for MGM (target: $40). WYNN is the only dividend payer here at 1.57% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $19.88 | $30.57 | $39.71 | $143.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 47 | 30 | 36 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +15.8% | +4.0% | +12.6% | +3.4% |
WYNN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BRAG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BRAG vs PENN vs CZR vs MGM vs WYNN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BRAG or PENN or CZR or MGM or WYNN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bragg Gaming Group Inc.
(BRAG) is the stronger pick with 63. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 1% for Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN). Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN) offers the better valuation at 34. 0x trailing P/E (20. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN) a "Buy" — based on 47 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BRAG or PENN or CZR or MGM or WYNN?
On trailing P/E, Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN) is the cheapest at 34.
0x versus MGM Resorts International at 50. 1x. On forward P/E, Wynn Resorts, Limited is actually cheaper at 20. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BRAG or PENN or CZR or MGM or WYNN?
Over the past 5 years, MGM Resorts International (MGM) delivered a total return of -4.
5%, compared to -85. 2% for Bragg Gaming Group Inc. (BRAG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZR returned +302. 6% versus BRAG's -79. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BRAG or PENN or CZR or MGM or WYNN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bragg Gaming Group Inc.
(BRAG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 24β versus PENN Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning PENN is approximately 469% more volatile than BRAG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bragg Gaming Group Inc. (BRAG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 17% for MGM Resorts International — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BRAG or PENN or CZR or MGM or WYNN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bragg Gaming Group Inc.
(BRAG) is pulling ahead at 63. 9% versus 0. 1% for Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wynn Resorts, Limited grew EPS -27. 8% year-over-year, compared to -184. 4% for PENN Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BRAG leads at 25. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BRAG or PENN or CZR or MGM or WYNN?
Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
6% net margin versus -12. 1% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CZR leads at 18. 1% versus -4. 4% for BRAG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MGM leads at 44. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BRAG or PENN or CZR or MGM or WYNN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN) trades at 20.
8x forward P/E versus 23. 0x for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WYNN: 33. 8% to $143. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BRAG or PENN or CZR or MGM or WYNN?
In this comparison, WYNN (1.
6% yield) pays a dividend. BRAG, PENN, CZR, MGM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BRAG or PENN or CZR or MGM or WYNN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bragg Gaming Group Inc.
(BRAG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 24)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BRAG: -79. 8%, PENN: +11. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BRAG and PENN and CZR and MGM and WYNN?
These companies operate in different sectors (BRAG (Technology) and PENN (Consumer Cyclical) and CZR (Consumer Cyclical) and MGM (Consumer Cyclical) and WYNN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BRAG is a small-cap high-growth stock; PENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WYNN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. WYNN pays a dividend while BRAG, PENN, CZR, MGM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.