Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BRFH vs SMPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
BRFH vs SMPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $39M | $1.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11M | $1.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $91M |
| Gross Margin | 30.9% | 34.0% |
| Operating Margin | -26.7% | 14.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.7x |
| Total Debt | $832K | $304M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $235K | $98M |
BRFH vs SMPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barfresh Food Group… (BRFH) | 100 | 42.3 | -57.7% |
| The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL) | 100 | 75.0 | -25.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BRFH vs SMPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BRFH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 31.9%, EPS growth 9.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.9%
- 31.9% revenue growth vs SMPL's 9.0%
- -18.5% vs SMPL's -65.4%
SMPL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.38
- 6.5% 10Y total return vs BRFH's -72.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 16.8%, current ratio 3.64x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.9% revenue growth vs SMPL's 9.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.3% margin vs BRFH's -27.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs BRFH's 0.81, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -18.5% vs SMPL's -65.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.7% ROA vs BRFH's -79.8%, ROIC 8.1% vs -232.8% |
BRFH vs SMPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BRFH vs SMPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMPL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 132.0x BRFH's $11M. SMPL is the more profitable business, keeping 6.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BRFH's -27.4%. On growth, BRFH holds the edge at +11.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $231M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $174M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.9% | +34.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.7% | +14.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -27.4% | +6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -21.8% | +12.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.0% | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.2% | -31.6% |
Valuation Metrics
SMPL leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $39M | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $39M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -12.74x | 12.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.53x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.60x | 0.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 61.45x | 0.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SMPL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SMPL delivers a 5.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-147 for BRFH. SMPL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BRFH's 1.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SMPL scores 5/9 vs BRFH's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -146.8% | +5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -79.8% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.3% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -173.0% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.44x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $597,000 | $206M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $235,000 | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $832,000 | $304M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -38.55x | 6.77x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BRFH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BRFH five years ago would be worth $3,961 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,768 for SMPL. Over the past 12 months, BRFH leads with a -18.5% total return vs SMPL's -65.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BRFH at 26.0% vs SMPL's -30.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.7% | -34.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.5% | -65.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.0% | -66.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.4% | -62.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.2% | +6.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.0% | -30.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BRFH and SMPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SMPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BRFH's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BRFH currently trades 39.8% from its 52-week high vs SMPL's 34.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.81x | 0.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.08 | $36.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.30 | $10.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +39.8% | +34.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.1 | 46.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +4.0% |
SMPL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BRFH leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
BRFH vs SMPL: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BRFH or SMPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Barfresh Food Group, Inc.
(BRFH) is the stronger pick with 31. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 0% for The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL). The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) offers the better valuation at 12. 5x trailing P/E (7. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BRFH or SMPL?
Over the past 5 years, Barfresh Food Group, Inc.
(BRFH) delivered a total return of -60. 4%, compared to -62. 3% for The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMPL returned +6. 5% versus BRFH's -72. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BRFH or SMPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
38β versus Barfresh Food Group, Inc. 's 0. 81β — meaning BRFH is approximately 114% more volatile than SMPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 144% for Barfresh Food Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BRFH or SMPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Barfresh Food Group, Inc.
(BRFH) is pulling ahead at 31. 9% versus 9. 0% for The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Barfresh Food Group, Inc. grew EPS 9. 5% year-over-year, compared to -26. 1% for The Simply Good Foods Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, BRFH leads at 16. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BRFH or SMPL?
The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
1% net margin versus -26. 4% for Barfresh Food Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMPL leads at 15. 1% versus -25. 9% for BRFH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMPL leads at 35. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BRFH or SMPL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is BRFH or SMPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
38)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMPL: +6. 5%, BRFH: -72. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BRFH and SMPL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BRFH is a small-cap high-growth stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.