Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BRIA vs ICHR vs MKSI vs ACMR vs ENTG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BRIA
Brillia Inc

Industrial - Distribution

IndustrialsAMEX • SG
Market Cap$46M
5Y Perf.-53.6%
ICHR
Ichor Holdings, Ltd.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.47B
5Y Perf.+117.4%
MKSI
MKS Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$20.25B
5Y Perf.+164.7%
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.92B
5Y Perf.+244.4%
ENTG
Entegris, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$22.48B
5Y Perf.+39.8%

BRIA vs ICHR vs MKSI vs ACMR vs ENTG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BRIA logoBRIA
ICHR logoICHR
MKSI logoMKSI
ACMR logoACMR
ENTG logoENTG
IndustryIndustrial - DistributionSemiconductorsHardware, Equipment & PartsSemiconductorsSemiconductors
Market Cap$46M$2.47B$20.25B$3.92B$22.48B
Revenue (TTM)$64M$959M$4.07B$901M$3.24B
Net Income (TTM)$3M$-51M$327M$94M$265M
Gross Margin16.2%11.3%45.2%44.4%43.2%
Operating Margin6.3%-3.8%14.8%12.1%29.1%
Forward P/E62.2x30.4x29.7x41.4x
Total Debt$2M$186M$4.69B$303M$3.89B
Cash & Equiv.$8M$98M$675M$766M$360M

BRIA vs ICHR vs MKSI vs ACMR vs ENTGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BRIA
ICHR
MKSI
ACMR
ENTG
StockNov 24May 26Return
Brillia Inc (BRIA)10046.4-53.6%
Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR)100217.4+117.4%
MKS Inc. (MKSI)100264.7+164.7%
ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR)100344.4+244.4%
Entegris, Inc. (ENTG)100139.8+39.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BRIA vs ICHR vs MKSI vs ACMR vs ENTG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BRIA leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. ACM Research, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. ICHR and MKSI also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BRIA
Brillia Inc
The Defensive Pick

BRIA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 9.3%, current ratio 2.84x
  • 15.3% revenue growth vs ENTG's -1.4%
  • Beta 0.64 vs ICHR's 3.93, lower leverage
  • 10.1% ROA vs ICHR's -5.2%, ROIC 44.1% vs -3.9%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
ICHR
Ichor Holdings, Ltd.
The Momentum Pick

ICHR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +329.1% vs BRIA's -27.0%
Best for: momentum
MKSI
MKS Inc.
The Income Pick

MKSI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.64, yield 0.3%
  • 0.3% yield, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.
The Growth Play

ACMR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth -10.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.3%
  • 30.7% 10Y total return vs ENTG's 10.4%
  • Lower P/E (29.7x vs 41.4x)
  • 10.4% margin vs ICHR's -5.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
ENTG
Entegris, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

ENTG is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 2.66, yield 0.3%, current ratio 3.35x
Best for: defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBRIA logoBRIA15.3% revenue growth vs ENTG's -1.4%
ValueACMR logoACMRLower P/E (29.7x vs 41.4x)
Quality / MarginsACMR logoACMR10.4% margin vs ICHR's -5.3%
Stability / SafetyBRIA logoBRIABeta 0.64 vs ICHR's 3.93, lower leverage
DividendsMKSI logoMKSI0.3% yield, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)ICHR logoICHR+329.1% vs BRIA's -27.0%
Efficiency (ROA)BRIA logoBRIA10.1% ROA vs ICHR's -5.2%, ROIC 44.1% vs -3.9%

BRIA vs ICHR vs MKSI vs ACMR vs ENTG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BRIABrillia Inc

Segment breakdown not available.

ICHRIchor Holdings, Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

MKSIMKS Inc.
FY 2025
Product
87.4%$3.4B
Service
12.6%$495M
ACMRACM Research, Inc.
FY 2025
Total Single Wafer and Semi-Critical Cleaning Equipment
69.5%$626M
ECP Front End And Packaging Furnace And Other Technologies
22.1%$200M
Advanced Packaging (exclude ECP), Services & Spares
8.4%$76M
ENTGEntegris, Inc.
FY 2025
Advanced Purity Solutions
56.1%$1.8B
Materials Solutions MS
43.9%$1.4B

BRIA vs ICHR vs MKSI vs ACMR vs ENTG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBRIALAGGINGENTG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MKSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

MKSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 63.2x BRIA's $64M. ACMR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ICHR's -5.3%. On growth, MKSI holds the edge at +15.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBRIA logoBRIABrillia IncICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.ENTG logoENTGEntegris, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$64M$959M$4.1B$901M$3.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$11M$945M$126M$1.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$51M$327M$94M$265M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$17M$401M-$69M$721M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+16.2%+11.3%+45.2%+44.4%+43.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+6.3%-3.8%+14.8%+12.1%+29.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+4.4%-5.3%+8.0%+10.4%+8.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-7.1%-1.7%+9.8%-7.6%+22.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.7%+15.2%+9.4%+5.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+46.2%+53.2%-76.1%+46.3%
MKSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — BRIA and ACMR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 43.2x trailing earnings, ACMR trades at a 55% valuation discount to ENTG's 95.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BRIA's 8.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACMR's 27.5x.

MetricBRIA logoBRIABrillia IncICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.ENTG logoENTGEntegris, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$46M$2.5B$20.2B$3.9B$22.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$40M$2.6B$24.3B$3.5B$26.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-46.25x68.83x43.21x95.26x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.62.25x30.36x29.68x41.38x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.22x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.79x26.70x27.49x19.81x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.71x2.61x5.15x4.35x7.03x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.67x7.49x2.06x5.68x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF40.74x56.74x
Evenly matched — BRIA and ACMR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BRIA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

BRIA delivers a 21.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-8 for ICHR. BRIA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BRIA scores 6/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricBRIA logoBRIABrillia IncICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.ENTG logoENTGEntegris, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+21.5%-7.5%+12.2%+6.1%+6.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+10.1%-5.2%+3.7%+3.9%+3.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+44.1%-3.9%+6.5%+7.0%+9.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+29.5%-4.7%+7.2%+6.6%+11.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–963625
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.09x0.28x1.73x0.16x0.98x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$6M$87M$4.0B-$463M$3.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$8M$98M$675M$766M$360M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$186M$4.7B$303M$3.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense8.12x-5.97x2.84x20.44x2.47x
BRIA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ACMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ACMR five years ago would be worth $23,344 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,908 for BRIA. Over the past 12 months, ICHR leads with a +329.1% total return vs BRIA's -27.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 80.5% vs BRIA's -21.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBRIA logoBRIABrillia IncICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.ENTG logoENTGEntegris, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+5.8%+249.0%+78.8%+31.9%+65.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-27.0%+329.1%+306.1%+195.6%+88.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-50.9%+151.1%+266.0%+487.9%+87.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-50.9%+28.9%+66.5%+133.4%+30.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-50.9%+629.1%+750.6%+3065.8%+1040.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-21.1%+35.9%+54.1%+80.5%+23.3%
ACMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BRIA and ICHR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BRIA is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICHR's 3.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ICHR currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs BRIA's 37.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBRIA logoBRIABrillia IncICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.ENTG logoENTGEntegris, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.64x3.93x2.64x3.24x2.66x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.95$72.87$326.83$71.65$159.15
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.41$13.12$71.49$19.26$66.32
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+37.0%+97.7%+92.0%+82.6%+92.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10050.366.965.360.763.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded4K795K1.2M1.2M2.4M
Evenly matched — BRIA and ICHR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — MKSI and ACMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ICHR as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy", ACMR as "Buy", ENTG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.9% upside for ENTG (target: $152) vs -32.4% for ACMR (target: $40). For income investors, MKSI offers the higher dividend yield at 0.29% vs ACMR's 0.19%.

MetricBRIA logoBRIABrillia IncICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.ENTG logoENTGEntegris, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$49.80$272.86$40.00$152.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts14291026
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%+0.2%+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01032
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.87$0.11$0.40
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.2%+0.2%0.0%
Evenly matched — MKSI and ACMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MKSI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). BRIA leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallBrillia Inc (BRIA)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BRIA vs ICHR vs MKSI vs ACMR vs ENTG: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BRIA or ICHR or MKSI or ACMR or ENTG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Brillia Inc (BRIA) is the stronger pick with 15.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for Entegris, Inc. (ENTG). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) offers the better valuation at 43. 2x trailing P/E (29. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BRIA or ICHR or MKSI or ACMR or ENTG?

On trailing P/E, ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) is the cheapest at 43. 2x versus Entegris, Inc. at 95. 3x. On forward P/E, ACM Research, Inc. is actually cheaper at 29. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BRIA or ICHR or MKSI or ACMR or ENTG?

Over the past 5 years, ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) delivered a total return of +133. 4%, compared to -50. 9% for Brillia Inc (BRIA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +30. 7% versus BRIA's -50. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BRIA or ICHR or MKSI or ACMR or ENTG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brillia Inc (BRIA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

64β versus Ichor Holdings, Ltd. 's 3. 93β — meaning ICHR is approximately 509% more volatile than BRIA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Brillia Inc (BRIA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BRIA or ICHR or MKSI or ACMR or ENTG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brillia Inc (BRIA) is pulling ahead at 15.

3% versus -1. 4% for Entegris, Inc. (ENTG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MKS Inc. grew EPS 55. 5% year-over-year, compared to -140. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACMR leads at 32. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BRIA or ICHR or MKSI or ACMR or ENTG?

ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 4% net margin versus -5. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 10. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENTG leads at 28. 9% versus -4. 1% for ICHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ENTG leads at 44. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BRIA or ICHR or MKSI or ACMR or ENTG more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) trades at 29. 7x forward P/E versus 62. 2x for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — 32. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ENTG: 2. 9% to $152. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BRIA or ICHR or MKSI or ACMR or ENTG?

In this comparison, MKSI (0.

3% yield), ENTG (0. 3% yield), ACMR (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. BRIA, ICHR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BRIA or ICHR or MKSI or ACMR or ENTG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Brillia Inc (BRIA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

64)). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BRIA: -50. 9%, ACMR: +30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BRIA and ICHR and MKSI and ACMR and ENTG?

These companies operate in different sectors (BRIA (Industrials) and ICHR (Technology) and MKSI (Technology) and ACMR (Technology) and ENTG (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BRIA is a small-cap high-growth stock; ICHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; ENTG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BRIA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ICHR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MKSI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACMR

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ENTG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BRIA and ICHR and MKSI and ACMR and ENTG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BRIA: 15.3% · ICHR: 4.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.