Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BRID vs HRL vs TSN vs SFD vs MDLZ

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BRID
Bridgford Foods Corporation

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$71M
5Y Perf.-24.5%
HRL
Hormel Foods Corporation

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$11.24B
5Y Perf.-31.9%
TSN
Tyson Foods, Inc.

Agricultural Farm Products

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$24.34B
5Y Perf.+21.0%
SFD
Smithfield Foods, Inc.

Agricultural Farm Products

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.20B
5Y Perf.+20.7%
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.

Food Confectioners

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$79.00B
5Y Perf.+6.1%

BRID vs HRL vs TSN vs SFD vs MDLZ — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BRID logoBRID
HRL logoHRL
TSN logoTSN
SFD logoSFD
MDLZ logoMDLZ
IndustryPackaged FoodsPackaged FoodsAgricultural Farm ProductsAgricultural Farm ProductsFood Confectioners
Market Cap$71M$11.24B$24.34B$10.20B$79.00B
Revenue (TTM)$227M$12.14B$55.71B$15.56B$39.30B
Net Income (TTM)$-7M$489M$453M$1.01B$2.61B
Gross Margin23.3%15.5%6.6%13.4%28.8%
Operating Margin-4.3%6.0%2.3%8.6%9.4%
Forward P/E13.9x17.0x9.7x20.1x
Total Debt$6M$2.86B$8.83B$2.40B$22.40B
Cash & Equiv.$10M$671M$1.23B$1.54B$2.13B

BRID vs HRL vs TSN vs SFD vs MDLZLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BRID
HRL
TSN
SFD
MDLZ
StockJan 25May 26Return
Bridgford Foods Cor… (BRID)10075.5-24.5%
Hormel Foods Corpor… (HRL)10068.1-31.9%
Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN)100121.0+21.0%
Smithfield Foods, I… (SFD)100120.7+20.7%
Mondelez Internatio… (MDLZ)100106.1+6.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BRID vs HRL vs TSN vs SFD vs MDLZ

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SFD leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Mondelez International, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. HRL and TSN also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BRID
Bridgford Foods Corporation
The Lower-Volatility Pick

Among these 5 stocks, BRID doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
HRL
Hormel Foods Corporation
The Income Pick

HRL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 34 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 5.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 36.1%, current ratio 2.47x
  • Beta 0.15, yield 5.6%, current ratio 2.47x
  • 5.6% yield, 34-year raise streak, vs MDLZ's 3.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
TSN
Tyson Foods, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

TSN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +25.0% vs HRL's -26.5%
Best for: momentum
SFD
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
The Growth Play

SFD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 7.3%, EPS growth 18.0%
  • 7.3% revenue growth vs BRID's -11.1%
  • Lower P/E (9.7x vs 20.1x)
  • 8.6% ROA vs BRID's -4.8%, ROIC 12.2% vs -3.8%
Best for: growth exposure
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

MDLZ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 69.0% 10Y total return vs SFD's 33.1%
  • 6.6% margin vs BRID's -3.2%
  • Beta 0.07 vs TSN's 0.26
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSFD logoSFD7.3% revenue growth vs BRID's -11.1%
ValueSFD logoSFDLower P/E (9.7x vs 20.1x)
Quality / MarginsMDLZ logoMDLZ6.6% margin vs BRID's -3.2%
Stability / SafetyMDLZ logoMDLZBeta 0.07 vs TSN's 0.26
DividendsHRL logoHRL5.6% yield, 34-year raise streak, vs MDLZ's 3.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)TSN logoTSN+25.0% vs HRL's -26.5%
Efficiency (ROA)SFD logoSFD8.6% ROA vs BRID's -4.8%, ROIC 12.2% vs -3.8%

BRID vs HRL vs TSN vs SFD vs MDLZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BRIDBridgford Foods Corporation
FY 2018
Snack Food Products
73.7%$87M
Frozen Food Products
26.3%$31M
HRLHormel Foods Corporation
FY 2025
Retail Segment
61.6%$7.5B
Foodservice Segment
32.6%$3.9B
International Segment
5.9%$709M
TSNTyson Foods, Inc.
FY 2025
Beef
38.3%$21.6B
Chicken
29.8%$16.8B
Prepared Foods
17.6%$9.9B
Pork
10.2%$5.8B
Corporate and Other
4.1%$2.3B
SFDSmithfield Foods, Inc.
FY 2025
Packaged Meats Segment
56.4%$8.8B
Fresh Pork Segment
53.7%$8.3B
Hog Production Segment
21.8%$3.4B
Other Segment
3.4%$528M
Intersegment Eliminations
-35.4%$-5,492,000,000
MDLZMondelez International, Inc.
FY 2025
Biscuits
47.7%$18.4B
Chocolate
32.9%$12.7B
Gum and Candy
10.5%$4.1B
Cheese and Grocery
6.2%$2.4B
Beverages
2.6%$1.0B

BRID vs HRL vs TSN vs SFD vs MDLZ — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHRLLAGGINGBRID

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MDLZ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

TSN is the larger business by revenue, generating $55.7B annually — 245.0x BRID's $227M. MDLZ is the more profitable business, keeping 6.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BRID's -3.2%. On growth, MDLZ holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBRID logoBRIDBridgford Foods C…HRL logoHRLHormel Foods Corp…TSN logoTSNTyson Foods, Inc.SFD logoSFDSmithfield Foods,…MDLZ logoMDLZMondelez Internat…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$227M$12.1B$55.7B$15.6B$39.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$5M$932M$2.7B$1.6B$4.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$7M$489M$453M$1.0B$2.6B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$13M$578M$1.2B$813M$2.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+23.3%+15.5%+6.6%+13.4%+28.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-4.3%+6.0%+2.3%+8.6%+9.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.2%+4.0%+0.8%+6.5%+6.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-5.5%+4.8%+2.2%+5.2%+6.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.5%+1.3%+4.4%+0.8%+8.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+10.0%+6.5%+36.1%+6.9%+38.7%
MDLZ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — BRID and SFD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 10.3x trailing earnings, SFD trades at a 79% valuation discount to TSN's 50.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SFD's 6.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BRID's 245.4x.

MetricBRID logoBRIDBridgford Foods C…HRL logoHRLHormel Foods Corp…TSN logoTSNTyson Foods, Inc.SFD logoSFDSmithfield Foods,…MDLZ logoMDLZMondelez Internat…
Market CapShares × price$71M$11.2B$24.3B$10.2B$79.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$67M$13.4B$31.9B$11.1B$99.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-21.11x23.48x50.28x10.34x32.56x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.92x16.96x9.75x20.13x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple245.43x13.66x11.40x6.81x19.94x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.32x0.93x0.45x0.66x2.05x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.55x1.42x1.31x1.44x3.09x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.03x20.68x14.21x24.42x
Evenly matched — BRID and SFD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SFD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

SFD delivers a 14.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-6 for BRID. BRID carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MDLZ's 0.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSN scores 6/9 vs BRID's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricBRID logoBRIDBridgford Foods C…HRL logoHRLHormel Foods Corp…TSN logoTSNTyson Foods, Inc.SFD logoSFDSmithfield Foods,…MDLZ logoMDLZMondelez Internat…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-6.0%+4.3%+2.5%+14.7%+10.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-4.8%+3.7%+1.3%+8.6%+3.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-3.8%+5.3%+4.1%+12.2%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-4.3%+6.0%+4.6%+12.4%+7.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–935655
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.05x0.36x0.48x0.34x0.87x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$4M$2.2B$7.6B$857M$20.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$10M$671M$1.2B$1.5B$2.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6M$2.9B$8.8B$2.4B$22.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-19.91x6.44x2.73x34.71x10.01x
SFD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TSN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SFD five years ago would be worth $13,305 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,452 for HRL. Over the past 12 months, TSN leads with a +25.0% total return vs HRL's -26.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TSN at 13.6% vs HRL's -16.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBRID logoBRIDBridgford Foods C…HRL logoHRLHormel Foods Corp…TSN logoTSNTyson Foods, Inc.SFD logoSFDSmithfield Foods,…MDLZ logoMDLZMondelez Internat…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-4.8%-10.2%+18.7%+18.6%+15.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-1.6%-26.5%+25.0%+19.3%-5.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-38.2%-41.3%+46.5%+33.1%-14.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-45.0%-45.5%-1.0%+33.1%+12.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-37.0%-24.7%+23.8%+33.1%+69.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-14.8%-16.3%+13.6%+10.0%-5.0%
TSN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BRID and TSN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BRID is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TSN's 0.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSN currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs HRL's 64.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBRID logoBRIDBridgford Foods C…HRL logoHRLHormel Foods Corp…TSN logoTSNTyson Foods, Inc.SFD logoSFDSmithfield Foods,…MDLZ logoMDLZMondelez Internat…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.02x0.15x0.26x0.23x0.07x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$8.74$31.86$69.48$29.80$71.15
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.00$20.32$50.56$21.08$51.20
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+89.4%+64.1%+98.4%+87.1%+86.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10061.040.263.739.464.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3K4.1M2.7M1.5M8.9M
Evenly matched — BRID and TSN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

HRL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: HRL as "Hold", TSN as "Buy", SFD as "Buy", MDLZ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.4% upside for HRL (target: $27) vs 8.9% for MDLZ (target: $67). For income investors, HRL offers the higher dividend yield at 5.63% vs TSN's 2.93%.

MetricBRID logoBRIDBridgford Foods C…HRL logoHRLHormel Foods Corp…TSN logoTSNTyson Foods, Inc.SFD logoSFDSmithfield Foods,…MDLZ logoMDLZMondelez Internat…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$27.25$75.00$32.00$67.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2930441
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+5.6%+2.9%+3.9%+3.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises03413112
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.15$2.00$1.01$1.92
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.8%0.0%+3.0%
HRL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MDLZ leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SFD leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallHormel Foods Corporation (HRL)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BRID vs HRL vs TSN vs SFD vs MDLZ: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BRID or HRL or TSN or SFD or MDLZ a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Mondelez International, Inc.

(MDLZ) is the stronger pick with 5. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 1% for Bridgford Foods Corporation (BRID). Smithfield Foods, Inc. (SFD) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BRID or HRL or TSN or SFD or MDLZ?

On trailing P/E, Smithfield Foods, Inc.

(SFD) is the cheapest at 10. 3x versus Tyson Foods, Inc. at 50. 3x. On forward P/E, Smithfield Foods, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BRID or HRL or TSN or SFD or MDLZ?

Over the past 5 years, Smithfield Foods, Inc.

(SFD) delivered a total return of +33. 1%, compared to -45. 5% for Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MDLZ returned +69. 0% versus BRID's -37. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BRID or HRL or TSN or SFD or MDLZ?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bridgford Foods Corporation (BRID) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

02β versus Tyson Foods, Inc. 's 0. 26β — meaning TSN is approximately -1321% more volatile than BRID relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bridgford Foods Corporation (BRID) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 87% for Mondelez International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BRID or HRL or TSN or SFD or MDLZ?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mondelez International, Inc.

(MDLZ) is pulling ahead at 5. 8% versus -11. 1% for Bridgford Foods Corporation (BRID). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tyson Foods, Inc. grew EPS -39. 6% year-over-year, compared to -197. 4% for Bridgford Foods Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MDLZ leads at 7. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BRID or HRL or TSN or SFD or MDLZ?

Mondelez International, Inc.

(MDLZ) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 4% net margin versus -1. 5% for Bridgford Foods Corporation — meaning it keeps 6. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MDLZ leads at 9. 4% versus -2. 8% for BRID. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MDLZ leads at 28. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BRID or HRL or TSN or SFD or MDLZ more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Smithfield Foods, Inc.

(SFD) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 20. 1x for Mondelez International, Inc. — 10. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HRL: 33. 4% to $27. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BRID or HRL or TSN or SFD or MDLZ?

In this comparison, HRL (5.

6% yield), SFD (3. 9% yield), MDLZ (3. 1% yield), TSN (2. 9% yield) pay a dividend. BRID does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BRID or HRL or TSN or SFD or MDLZ better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Mondelez International, Inc.

(MDLZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 07), 3. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDLZ: +69. 0%, BRID: -37. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BRID and HRL and TSN and SFD and MDLZ?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BRID is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HRL is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; TSN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SFD is a mid-cap deep-value stock; MDLZ is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. HRL, TSN, SFD, MDLZ pay a dividend while BRID does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BRID

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HRL

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 2.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TSN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SFD

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MDLZ

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BRID and HRL and TSN and SFD and MDLZ on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BRID: 5.5% · HRL: 1.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.