Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BRID vs HRL vs TSN vs SFD vs MDLZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Agricultural Farm Products
Agricultural Farm Products
Food Confectioners
BRID vs HRL vs TSN vs SFD vs MDLZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Agricultural Farm Products | Agricultural Farm Products | Food Confectioners |
| Market Cap | $71M | $11.24B | $24.34B | $10.20B | $79.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $227M | $12.14B | $55.71B | $15.56B | $39.30B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $489M | $453M | $1.01B | $2.61B |
| Gross Margin | 23.3% | 15.5% | 6.6% | 13.4% | 28.8% |
| Operating Margin | -4.3% | 6.0% | 2.3% | 8.6% | 9.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.9x | 17.0x | 9.7x | 20.1x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $2.86B | $8.83B | $2.40B | $22.40B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $671M | $1.23B | $1.54B | $2.13B |
BRID vs HRL vs TSN vs SFD vs MDLZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bridgford Foods Cor… (BRID) | 100 | 75.5 | -24.5% |
| Hormel Foods Corpor… (HRL) | 100 | 68.1 | -31.9% |
| Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN) | 100 | 121.0 | +21.0% |
| Smithfield Foods, I… (SFD) | 100 | 120.7 | +20.7% |
| Mondelez Internatio… (MDLZ) | 100 | 106.1 | +6.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BRID vs HRL vs TSN vs SFD vs MDLZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, BRID doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HRL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 34 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 5.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 36.1%, current ratio 2.47x
- Beta 0.15, yield 5.6%, current ratio 2.47x
- 5.6% yield, 34-year raise streak, vs MDLZ's 3.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
TSN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +25.0% vs HRL's -26.5%
SFD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 7.3%, EPS growth 18.0%
- 7.3% revenue growth vs BRID's -11.1%
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 20.1x)
- 8.6% ROA vs BRID's -4.8%, ROIC 12.2% vs -3.8%
MDLZ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 69.0% 10Y total return vs SFD's 33.1%
- 6.6% margin vs BRID's -3.2%
- Beta 0.07 vs TSN's 0.26
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.3% revenue growth vs BRID's -11.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 20.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.6% margin vs BRID's -3.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs TSN's 0.26 | |
| Dividends | 5.6% yield, 34-year raise streak, vs MDLZ's 3.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.0% vs HRL's -26.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs BRID's -4.8%, ROIC 12.2% vs -3.8% |
BRID vs HRL vs TSN vs SFD vs MDLZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BRID vs HRL vs TSN vs SFD vs MDLZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MDLZ leads in 1 of 6 categories
SFD leads 1 • TSN leads 1 • HRL leads 1 • BRID leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDLZ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TSN is the larger business by revenue, generating $55.7B annually — 245.0x BRID's $227M. MDLZ is the more profitable business, keeping 6.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BRID's -3.2%. On growth, MDLZ holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $227M | $12.1B | $55.7B | $15.6B | $39.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $932M | $2.7B | $1.6B | $4.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $489M | $453M | $1.0B | $2.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13M | $578M | $1.2B | $813M | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.3% | +15.5% | +6.6% | +13.4% | +28.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | +6.0% | +2.3% | +8.6% | +9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | +4.0% | +0.8% | +6.5% | +6.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.5% | +4.8% | +2.2% | +5.2% | +6.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.5% | +1.3% | +4.4% | +0.8% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.0% | +6.5% | +36.1% | +6.9% | +38.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BRID and SFD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, SFD trades at a 79% valuation discount to TSN's 50.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SFD's 6.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BRID's 245.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $71M | $11.2B | $24.3B | $10.2B | $79.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $67M | $13.4B | $31.9B | $11.1B | $99.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -21.11x | 23.48x | 50.28x | 10.34x | 32.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.92x | 16.96x | 9.75x | 20.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 245.43x | 13.66x | 11.40x | 6.81x | 19.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.32x | 0.93x | 0.45x | 0.66x | 2.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.55x | 1.42x | 1.31x | 1.44x | 3.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.03x | 20.68x | 14.21x | 24.42x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SFD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SFD delivers a 14.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-6 for BRID. BRID carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MDLZ's 0.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSN scores 6/9 vs BRID's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.0% | +4.3% | +2.5% | +14.7% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.8% | +3.7% | +1.3% | +8.6% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.8% | +5.3% | +4.1% | +12.2% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.3% | +6.0% | +4.6% | +12.4% | +7.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.36x | 0.48x | 0.34x | 0.87x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $2.2B | $7.6B | $857M | $20.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $671M | $1.2B | $1.5B | $2.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $2.9B | $8.8B | $2.4B | $22.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -19.91x | 6.44x | 2.73x | 34.71x | 10.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TSN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SFD five years ago would be worth $13,305 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,452 for HRL. Over the past 12 months, TSN leads with a +25.0% total return vs HRL's -26.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TSN at 13.6% vs HRL's -16.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.8% | -10.2% | +18.7% | +18.6% | +15.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.6% | -26.5% | +25.0% | +19.3% | -5.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.2% | -41.3% | +46.5% | +33.1% | -14.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.0% | -45.5% | -1.0% | +33.1% | +12.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.0% | -24.7% | +23.8% | +33.1% | +69.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.8% | -16.3% | +13.6% | +10.0% | -5.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BRID and TSN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BRID is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TSN's 0.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSN currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs HRL's 64.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.02x | 0.15x | 0.26x | 0.23x | 0.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.74 | $31.86 | $69.48 | $29.80 | $71.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.00 | $20.32 | $50.56 | $21.08 | $51.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.4% | +64.1% | +98.4% | +87.1% | +86.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.0 | 40.2 | 63.7 | 39.4 | 64.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 4.1M | 2.7M | 1.5M | 8.9M |
Analyst Outlook
HRL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HRL as "Hold", TSN as "Buy", SFD as "Buy", MDLZ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.4% upside for HRL (target: $27) vs 8.9% for MDLZ (target: $67). For income investors, HRL offers the higher dividend yield at 5.63% vs TSN's 2.93%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.25 | $75.00 | $32.00 | $67.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 29 | 30 | 4 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.6% | +2.9% | +3.9% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 34 | 13 | 1 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.15 | $2.00 | $1.01 | $1.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% | +3.0% |
MDLZ leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SFD leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
BRID vs HRL vs TSN vs SFD vs MDLZ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BRID or HRL or TSN or SFD or MDLZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mondelez International, Inc.
(MDLZ) is the stronger pick with 5. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 1% for Bridgford Foods Corporation (BRID). Smithfield Foods, Inc. (SFD) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BRID or HRL or TSN or SFD or MDLZ?
On trailing P/E, Smithfield Foods, Inc.
(SFD) is the cheapest at 10. 3x versus Tyson Foods, Inc. at 50. 3x. On forward P/E, Smithfield Foods, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BRID or HRL or TSN or SFD or MDLZ?
Over the past 5 years, Smithfield Foods, Inc.
(SFD) delivered a total return of +33. 1%, compared to -45. 5% for Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MDLZ returned +69. 0% versus BRID's -37. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BRID or HRL or TSN or SFD or MDLZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bridgford Foods Corporation (BRID) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
02β versus Tyson Foods, Inc. 's 0. 26β — meaning TSN is approximately -1321% more volatile than BRID relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bridgford Foods Corporation (BRID) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 87% for Mondelez International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BRID or HRL or TSN or SFD or MDLZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mondelez International, Inc.
(MDLZ) is pulling ahead at 5. 8% versus -11. 1% for Bridgford Foods Corporation (BRID). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tyson Foods, Inc. grew EPS -39. 6% year-over-year, compared to -197. 4% for Bridgford Foods Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MDLZ leads at 7. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BRID or HRL or TSN or SFD or MDLZ?
Mondelez International, Inc.
(MDLZ) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 4% net margin versus -1. 5% for Bridgford Foods Corporation — meaning it keeps 6. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MDLZ leads at 9. 4% versus -2. 8% for BRID. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MDLZ leads at 28. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BRID or HRL or TSN or SFD or MDLZ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Smithfield Foods, Inc.
(SFD) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 20. 1x for Mondelez International, Inc. — 10. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HRL: 33. 4% to $27. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — BRID or HRL or TSN or SFD or MDLZ?
In this comparison, HRL (5.
6% yield), SFD (3. 9% yield), MDLZ (3. 1% yield), TSN (2. 9% yield) pay a dividend. BRID does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BRID or HRL or TSN or SFD or MDLZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mondelez International, Inc.
(MDLZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 07), 3. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDLZ: +69. 0%, BRID: -37. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BRID and HRL and TSN and SFD and MDLZ?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BRID is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HRL is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; TSN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SFD is a mid-cap deep-value stock; MDLZ is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. HRL, TSN, SFD, MDLZ pay a dividend while BRID does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.