Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BRN vs XOM vs SLB vs HAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Integrated
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
BRN vs XOM vs SLB vs HAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $14M | $620.85B | $79.62B | $32.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12M | $323.90B | $35.71B | $22.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $28.84B | $3.35B | $1.54B |
| Gross Margin | 8.6% | 21.7% | 18.2% | 15.3% |
| Operating Margin | -50.9% | 10.5% | 15.3% | 11.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.8x | 19.8x | 16.8x |
| Total Debt | $264K | $43.54B | $12.31B | $8.13B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $10.68B | $3.04B | $2.21B |
BRN vs XOM vs SLB vs HAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barnwell Industries… (BRN) | 100 | 191.4 | +91.4% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 322.2 | +222.2% |
| SLB N.V. (SLB) | 100 | 287.2 | +187.2% |
| Halliburton Company (HAL) | 100 | 333.0 | +233.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BRN vs XOM vs SLB vs HAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BRN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
XOM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 26 yrs, beta -0.15, yield 2.7%
- 105.0% 10Y total return vs HAL's 16.2%
- Lower P/E (14.8x vs 16.8x)
- 2.7% yield, 26-year raise streak, vs HAL's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
SLB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth -1.6%, EPS growth -24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.3%
- -1.6% revenue growth vs BRN's -36.9%
- 9.4% margin vs BRN's -53.1%
- 6.5% ROA vs BRN's -30.7%, ROIC 12.1% vs -61.9%
HAL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 77.4%, current ratio 2.04x
- Beta 0.57, yield 1.8%, current ratio 2.04x
- Beta 0.57 vs SLB's 0.87
- +105.6% vs BRN's -15.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.6% revenue growth vs BRN's -36.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.8x vs 16.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.4% margin vs BRN's -53.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs SLB's 0.87 | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 26-year raise streak, vs HAL's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +105.6% vs BRN's -15.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs BRN's -30.7%, ROIC 12.1% vs -61.9% |
BRN vs XOM vs SLB vs HAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BRN vs XOM vs SLB vs HAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
XOM leads in 2 of 6 categories
SLB leads 1 • BRN leads 1 • HAL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 26039.5x BRN's $12M. SLB is the more profitable business, keeping 9.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BRN's -53.1%. On growth, SLB holds the edge at +5.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12M | $323.9B | $35.7B | $22.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $59.9B | $7.4B | $3.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $28.8B | $3.4B | $1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$607,000 | $23.6B | $4.8B | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | +21.7% | +18.2% | +15.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -50.9% | +10.5% | +15.3% | +11.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -53.1% | +8.9% | +9.4% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.9% | +7.3% | +13.4% | +7.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -40.2% | -1.3% | +5.0% | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.6% | -11.0% | -31.2% | +129.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BRN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.9x trailing earnings, XOM trades at a 16% valuation discount to HAL's 26.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, XOM's 10.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SLB's 12.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $620.8B | $79.6B | $32.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11M | $653.7B | $88.9B | $38.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.61x | 21.86x | 22.57x | 26.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.79x | 19.79x | 16.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.91x | 12.07x | 11.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.02x | 1.92x | 2.23x | 1.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.59x | 2.37x | 2.89x | 3.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 26.29x | 16.60x | 19.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BRN and SLB each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HAL delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-81 for BRN. BRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HAL's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAL scores 5/9 vs BRN's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -80.6% | +10.7% | +13.9% | +14.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -30.7% | +6.4% | +6.5% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -61.9% | +8.6% | +12.1% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -27.5% | +8.9% | +14.3% | +11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.16x | 0.45x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $32.9B | $9.3B | $5.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $10.7B | $3.0B | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $264,000 | $43.5B | $12.3B | $8.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -991.14x | 69.44x | 9.40x | 9.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XOM five years ago would be worth $26,464 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,072 for BRN. Over the past 12 months, HAL leads with a +105.6% total return vs BRN's -15.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XOM at 13.2% vs BRN's -25.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.5% | +20.3% | +32.7% | +32.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -15.9% | +43.9% | +61.8% | +105.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.9% | +44.9% | +20.8% | +37.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.3% | +164.6% | +80.6% | +82.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.3% | +105.0% | -9.2% | +16.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.1% | +13.2% | +6.5% | +11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BRN and SLB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BRN is the less volatile stock with a -0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLB's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLB currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs BRN's 48.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.30x | -0.15x | 0.87x | 0.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.28 | $176.41 | $57.20 | $42.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.93 | $101.19 | $31.64 | $19.22 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.7% | +83.0% | +92.7% | +92.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.5 | 42.4 | 57.9 | 55.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 923K | 18.9M | 16.3M | 15.0M |
Analyst Outlook
XOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: XOM as "Hold", SLB as "Buy", HAL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.5% upside for XOM (target: $160) vs -5.2% for HAL (target: $37). For income investors, XOM offers the higher dividend yield at 2.73% vs HAL's 1.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $160.43 | $56.95 | $37.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 55 | 66 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.7% | +2.0% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 26 | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $4.00 | $1.08 | $0.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.3% | +3.0% | +3.1% |
XOM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). SLB leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
BRN vs XOM vs SLB vs HAL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BRN or XOM or SLB or HAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the stronger pick with -1. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -36. 9% for Barnwell Industries, Inc. (BRN). Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) offers the better valuation at 21. 9x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SLB N. V. (SLB) a "Buy" — based on 66 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BRN or XOM or SLB or HAL?
On trailing P/E, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the cheapest at 21.
9x versus Halliburton Company at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, Exxon Mobil Corporation is actually cheaper at 14. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BRN or XOM or SLB or HAL?
Over the past 5 years, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) delivered a total return of +164.
6%, compared to -59. 3% for Barnwell Industries, Inc. (BRN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XOM returned +105. 0% versus BRN's -27. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BRN or XOM or SLB or HAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Barnwell Industries, Inc.
(BRN) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 30β versus SLB N. V. 's 0. 87β — meaning SLB is approximately -390% more volatile than BRN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Barnwell Industries, Inc. (BRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 77% for Halliburton Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BRN or XOM or SLB or HAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SLB N.
V. (SLB) is pulling ahead at -1. 6% versus -36. 9% for Barnwell Industries, Inc. (BRN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exxon Mobil Corporation grew EPS -14. 5% year-over-year, compared to -47. 0% for Halliburton Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, SLB leads at 8. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BRN or XOM or SLB or HAL?
SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 4% net margin versus -50. 4% for Barnwell Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SLB leads at 15. 3% versus -39. 1% for BRN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XOM leads at 21. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BRN or XOM or SLB or HAL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) trades at 14.
8x forward P/E versus 19. 8x for SLB N. V. — 5. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XOM: 9. 5% to $160. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — BRN or XOM or SLB or HAL?
In this comparison, XOM (2.
7% yield), SLB (2. 0% yield), HAL (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. BRN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BRN or XOM or SLB or HAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 7% yield, +105. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +105. 0%, SLB: -9. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BRN and XOM and SLB and HAL?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
XOM, SLB, HAL pay a dividend while BRN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.