BRSL vs FLUT

For growth investors, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) is the stronger pick with 16.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 0% for Brightstar Lottery (BRSL). Analysts rate Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) delivered a total return of +10.

5%, compared to -51. 1% for Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BRSL returned +29. 2% versus FLUT's -24. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

91β versus Flutter Entertainment plc's 1. 23β — meaning FLUT is approximately 35% more volatile than BRSL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 138% versus 3% for Brightstar Lottery — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) is pulling ahead at 16.

6% versus -0. 0% for Brightstar Lottery (BRSL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brightstar Lottery grew EPS -100. 5% year-over-year, compared to -820. 8% for Flutter Entertainment plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLUT leads at 20. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) is the more profitable company, earning 2.

8% net margin versus -1. 9% for Flutter Entertainment plc — meaning it keeps 2. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BRSL leads at 35. 1% versus 6. 3% for FLUT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLUT leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) trades at 14.

6x forward P/E versus 16. 2x for Flutter Entertainment plc — 1. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLUT: 129. 9% to $227. 86.

In this comparison, BRSL (30.

9% yield) pays a dividend. FLUT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

91), 30. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BRSL: +29. 2%, FLUT: -24. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BRSL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FLUT is a mid-cap high-growth stock. BRSL pays a dividend while FLUT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.