Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BRSL vs PLTK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
BRSL vs PLTK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
| Market Cap | $2.35B | $1.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.51B | $2.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $147M | $-295M |
| Gross Margin | 47.1% | 73.0% |
| Operating Margin | 29.8% | -3.0% |
| Forward P/E | 14.7x | 7.2x |
| Total Debt | $4.25B | $2.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.45B | $684M |
BRSL vs PLTK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) | 100 | 78.8 | -21.2% |
| Playtika Holding Co… (PLTK) | 100 | 12.3 | -87.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BRSL vs PLTK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BRSL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.91, yield 30.8%
- 31.3% 10Y total return vs PLTK's -86.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.91, current ratio 0.76x
PLTK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.1%, EPS growth -225.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.8%
- 8.1% revenue growth vs BRSL's -0.0%
- Lower P/E (7.2x vs 14.7x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.1% revenue growth vs BRSL's -0.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.2x vs 14.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.9% margin vs PLTK's -10.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.91 vs PLTK's 1.29 | |
| Dividends | 30.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs PLTK's 11.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -2.4% vs PLTK's -28.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.6% ROA vs PLTK's -8.0%, ROIC 11.7% vs 0.1% |
BRSL vs PLTK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BRSL and PLTK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLTK and BRSL operate at a comparable scale, with $2.8B and $2.5B in trailing revenue. BRSL is the more profitable business, keeping 5.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLTK's -10.5%. On growth, PLTK holds the edge at +5.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.5B | $2.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $217M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $147M | -$295M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$456M | $561M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.1% | +73.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.8% | -3.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | -10.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -18.2% | +20.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +5.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -70.1% | -2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BRSL and PLTK each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, BRSL's 4.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PLTK's 14.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.2B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1269.00x | -6.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.65x | 7.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.67x | 14.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.94x | 0.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.57x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.56x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BRSL leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BRSL scores 4/9 vs PLTK's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.2% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | -8.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.7% | +0.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.9% | +0.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.67x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.8B | $2.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.4B | $684M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.3B | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.66x | -0.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BRSL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BRSL five years ago would be worth $10,703 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,599 for PLTK. Over the past 12 months, BRSL leads with a -2.4% total return vs PLTK's -28.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BRSL at -12.8% vs PLTK's -24.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.6% | -9.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.4% | -28.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.8% | -56.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.0% | -84.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.3% | -86.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.8% | -24.4% |
Risk & Volatility
BRSL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BRSL is the less volatile stock with a 0.91 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLTK's 1.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BRSL currently trades 68.3% from its 52-week high vs PLTK's 65.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.91x | 1.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.57 | $5.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.02 | $2.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.3% | +65.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.1 | 58.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
BRSL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BRSL as "Buy" and PLTK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 45.8% upside for BRSL (target: $19) vs 4.4% for PLTK (target: $4). For income investors, BRSL offers the higher dividend yield at 30.80% vs PLTK's 11.11%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.50 | $3.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +30.8% | +11.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.91 | $0.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +11.5% | +1.5% |
BRSL leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 2 categories are tied.
BRSL vs PLTK: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BRSL or PLTK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Playtika Holding Corp.
(PLTK) is the stronger pick with 8. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 0% for Brightstar Lottery (BRSL). Analysts rate Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BRSL or PLTK?
Over the past 5 years, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) delivered a total return of +7.
0%, compared to -84. 0% for Playtika Holding Corp. (PLTK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BRSL returned +31. 3% versus PLTK's -86. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BRSL or PLTK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
91β versus Playtika Holding Corp. 's 1. 29β — meaning PLTK is approximately 42% more volatile than BRSL relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — BRSL or PLTK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Playtika Holding Corp.
(PLTK) is pulling ahead at 8. 1% versus -0. 0% for Brightstar Lottery (BRSL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brightstar Lottery grew EPS -100. 5% year-over-year, compared to -225. 0% for Playtika Holding Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLTK leads at 1. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BRSL or PLTK?
Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) is the more profitable company, earning 2.
8% net margin versus -7. 5% for Playtika Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 2. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BRSL leads at 35. 1% versus 0. 0% for PLTK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLTK leads at 72. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BRSL or PLTK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Playtika Holding Corp.
(PLTK) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 14. 7x for Brightstar Lottery — 7. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BRSL: 45. 8% to $18. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — BRSL or PLTK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) offers the highest yield at 30. 8%, versus 11. 1% for Playtika Holding Corp. (PLTK).
08Is BRSL or PLTK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
91), 30. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BRSL: +31. 3%, PLTK: -86. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BRSL and PLTK?
These companies operate in different sectors (BRSL (Consumer Cyclical) and PLTK (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.