BRSL vs SRAD

For growth investors, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is the stronger pick with 12.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 0% for Brightstar Lottery (BRSL). Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) offers the better valuation at 38. 7x trailing P/E (33. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Brightstar Lottery is actually cheaper at 14.

7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) delivered a total return of +7.

0%, compared to -45. 5% for Sportradar Group AG (SRAD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BRSL returned +31. 3% versus SRAD's -45. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

65β versus Brightstar Lottery's 0. 91β — meaning BRSL is approximately 40% more volatile than SRAD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 3% for Brightstar Lottery — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is pulling ahead at 12.

0% versus -0. 0% for Brightstar Lottery (BRSL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sportradar Group AG grew EPS 200. 0% year-over-year, compared to -100. 5% for Brightstar Lottery. Over a 3-year CAGR, SRAD leads at 19. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is the more profitable company, earning 7.

8% net margin versus 2. 8% for Brightstar Lottery — meaning it keeps 7. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BRSL leads at 35. 1% versus 9. 1% for SRAD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BRSL leads at 41. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) trades at 14.

7x forward P/E versus 33. 1x for Sportradar Group AG — 18. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SRAD: 59. 5% to $21. 75.

In this comparison, BRSL (30.

8% yield) pays a dividend. SRAD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Brightstar Lottery (BRSL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

91), 30. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BRSL: +31. 3%, SRAD: -45. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (BRSL (Consumer Cyclical) and SRAD (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BRSL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SRAD is a small-cap quality compounder stock. BRSL pays a dividend while SRAD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.