Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BSLK vs SPRU vs SHLS vs RUN vs CWEN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BSLK
Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc.

Shell Companies

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$59K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
SPRU
Spruce Power Holding Corporation

Solar

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$63M
5Y Perf.+1.8%
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.32B
5Y Perf.+20.6%
RUN
Sunrun Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.24B
5Y Perf.-21.3%
CWEN
Clearway Energy, Inc.

Renewable Utilities

UtilitiesNYSE • US
Market Cap$7.84B
5Y Perf.+43.0%

BSLK vs SPRU vs SHLS vs RUN vs CWEN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BSLK logoBSLK
SPRU logoSPRU
SHLS logoSHLS
RUN logoRUN
CWEN logoCWEN
IndustryShell CompaniesSolarSolarSolarRenewable Utilities
Market Cap$59K$63M$1.32B$3.24B$7.84B
Revenue (TTM)$1M$108M$536M$3.17B$1.43B
Net Income (TTM)$-24M$-25M$34M$568M$169M
Gross Margin-6.8%61.3%33.5%23.5%50.3%
Operating Margin-30.3%8.5%11.2%-1.8%12.0%
Forward P/E19.4x22.8x26.9x
Total Debt$13M$711M$175M$14.89B$10.20B
Cash & Equiv.$4M$73M$7M$1.24B$818M

BSLK vs SPRU vs SHLS vs RUN vs CWENLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BSLK
SPRU
SHLS
RUN
CWEN
StockJul 24May 26Return
Bolt Projects Holdi… (BSLK)1000.0-100.0%
Spruce Power Holdin… (SPRU)100101.8+1.8%
Shoals Technologies… (SHLS)100120.6+20.6%
Sunrun Inc. (RUN)10078.7-21.3%
Clearway Energy, In… (CWEN)100143.0+43.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BSLK vs SPRU vs SHLS vs RUN vs CWEN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SPRU and SHLS are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and operational efficiency and capital deployment. RUN and CWEN also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BSLK
Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc.
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, BSLK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
SPRU
Spruce Power Holding Corporation
The Defensive Pick

SPRU has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.33, current ratio 2.29x
  • Beta 0.33, current ratio 2.29x
  • Beta 0.33 vs RUN's 2.89
  • +97.7% vs BSLK's -98.9%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
The Income Pick

SHLS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.08
  • Lower P/E (19.4x vs 26.9x)
  • 3.7% ROA vs BSLK's -218.1%
Best for: income & stability
RUN
Sunrun Inc.
The Growth Play

RUN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 45.1%, EPS growth 113.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
  • 45.1% revenue growth vs BSLK's -60.1%
  • 17.9% margin vs BSLK's -47.6%
Best for: growth exposure
CWEN
Clearway Energy, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CWEN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 237.4% 10Y total return vs RUN's 86.7%
  • 7.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRUN logoRUN45.1% revenue growth vs BSLK's -60.1%
ValueSHLS logoSHLSLower P/E (19.4x vs 26.9x)
Quality / MarginsRUN logoRUN17.9% margin vs BSLK's -47.6%
Stability / SafetySPRU logoSPRUBeta 0.33 vs RUN's 2.89
DividendsCWEN logoCWEN7.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)SPRU logoSPRU+97.7% vs BSLK's -98.9%
Efficiency (ROA)SHLS logoSHLS3.7% ROA vs BSLK's -218.1%

BSLK vs SPRU vs SHLS vs RUN vs CWEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BSLKBolt Projects Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

SPRUSpruce Power Holding Corporation
FY 2024
PPA Revenue
90.5%$38M
Product and Service, Other
7.6%$3M
Service
1.8%$778,000
SHLSShoals Technologies Group, Inc.
FY 2025
System Solutions
78.7%$374M
Components
21.3%$101M
RUNSunrun Inc.
FY 2025
Service
30.8%$1.8B
Customer Agreements
28.9%$1.7B
Product
19.2%$1.1B
Energy Systems
14.9%$878M
Manufactured Product, Other
4.4%$260M
Incentives
1.9%$111M
CWENClearway Energy, Inc.
FY 2025
Energy Revenue
72.9%$1.2B
Capacity Revenue
22.5%$369M
Products And Services, Other
4.6%$76M

BSLK vs SPRU vs SHLS vs RUN vs CWEN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSHLSLAGGINGRUN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — RUN and CWEN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

RUN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 2312.4x BSLK's $1M. RUN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BSLK's -47.6%. On growth, SHLS holds the edge at +74.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBSLK logoBSLKBolt Projects Hol…SPRU logoSPRUSpruce Power Hold…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.CWEN logoCWENClearway Energy, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1M$108M$536M$3.2B$1.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$20M$36M$73M$541M$1.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$24M-$25M$34M$568M$169M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$5M-$25M-$77M-$326M$268M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-6.8%+61.3%+33.5%+23.5%+50.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-30.3%+8.5%+11.2%-1.8%+12.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-47.6%-23.2%+6.3%+17.9%+11.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-11.8%-23.4%-14.5%-10.3%+18.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+43.7%+74.9%+43.2%+21.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-142.1%+98.3%+2.1%-35.3%
Evenly matched — RUN and CWEN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SPRU leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 8.1x trailing earnings, RUN trades at a 79% valuation discount to SHLS's 39.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CWEN's 16.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RUN's 24.3x.

MetricBSLK logoBSLKBolt Projects Hol…SPRU logoSPRUSpruce Power Hold…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.CWEN logoCWENClearway Energy, …
Market CapShares × price$59,200$63M$1.3B$3.2B$7.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$10M$701M$1.5B$16.9B$17.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.00x-0.91x39.20x8.07x26.86x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.40x22.75x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.59x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple22.83x24.31x16.23x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.04x0.77x2.77x1.09x5.48x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.44x2.20x0.75x0.77x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.24x
SPRU leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SHLS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

RUN delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-20 for SPRU. SHLS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SPRU's 4.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RUN scores 6/9 vs SPRU's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricBSLK logoBSLKBolt Projects Hol…SPRU logoSPRUSpruce Power Hold…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.CWEN logoCWENClearway Energy, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-19.7%+5.7%+12.4%+3.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.2%-2.9%+3.7%+2.5%+1.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-5.1%+5.9%-0.5%+0.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-35.0%-6.1%+7.6%-0.6%+1.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–942564
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage4.87x0.29x2.99x1.72x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$10M$638M$168M$13.6B$9.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$4M$73M$7M$1.2B$818M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$13M$711M$175M$14.9B$10.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-14.88x0.52x5.91x-0.02x0.55x
SHLS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CWEN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CWEN five years ago would be worth $17,246 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3 for BSLK. Over the past 12 months, SPRU leads with a +97.7% total return vs BSLK's -98.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CWEN at 12.8% vs BSLK's -93.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBSLK logoBSLKBolt Projects Hol…SPRU logoSPRUSpruce Power Hold…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.CWEN logoCWENClearway Energy, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-87.1%-34.3%-13.8%-29.0%+13.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-98.9%+97.7%+66.5%+86.7%+39.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-35.7%-60.2%-19.7%+43.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-93.0%-72.8%-69.8%+72.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-95.6%-74.7%+86.7%+237.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-93.0%-13.7%-26.5%-7.1%+12.8%
CWEN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SPRU and CWEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SPRU is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RUN's 2.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWEN currently trades 91.8% from its 52-week high vs BSLK's 0.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBSLK logoBSLKBolt Projects Hol…SPRU logoSPRUSpruce Power Hold…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.CWEN logoCWENClearway Energy, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.18x0.33x2.08x2.89x0.54x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.55$6.75$11.36$22.44$41.54
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.05$1.13$3.81$5.38$27.67
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+0.4%+51.6%+69.0%+61.5%+91.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10041.941.963.249.045.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded16K44K5.1M10.4M828K
Evenly matched — SPRU and CWEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: SHLS as "Buy", RUN as "Buy", CWEN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.4% upside for RUN (target: $18) vs 14.5% for CWEN (target: $44). CWEN is the only dividend payer here at 7.89% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricBSLK logoBSLKBolt Projects Hol…SPRU logoSPRUSpruce Power Hold…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.CWEN logoCWENClearway Energy, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$9.83$18.14$43.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts233616
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+7.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1312
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.3%+0.0%0.0%0.0%
SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

SHLS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). SPRU leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallShoals Technologies Group, … (SHLS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BSLK vs SPRU vs SHLS vs RUN vs CWEN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BSLK or SPRU or SHLS or RUN or CWEN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is the stronger pick with 45. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -60. 1% for Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. (BSLK). Sunrun Inc. (RUN) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (22. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BSLK or SPRU or SHLS or RUN or CWEN?

On trailing P/E, Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. at 39. 2x. On forward P/E, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BSLK or SPRU or SHLS or RUN or CWEN?

Over the past 5 years, Clearway Energy, Inc.

(CWEN) delivered a total return of +72. 5%, compared to -100. 0% for Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. (BSLK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWEN returned +237. 4% versus BSLK's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BSLK or SPRU or SHLS or RUN or CWEN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Spruce Power Holding Corporation (SPRU) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

33β versus Sunrun Inc. 's 2. 89β — meaning RUN is approximately 782% more volatile than SPRU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 5% for Spruce Power Holding Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BSLK or SPRU or SHLS or RUN or CWEN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is pulling ahead at 45. 1% versus -60. 1% for Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. (BSLK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunrun Inc. grew EPS 113. 3% year-over-year, compared to -6. 7% for Spruce Power Holding Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPRU leads at 73. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BSLK or SPRU or SHLS or RUN or CWEN?

Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -47. 6% for Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWEN leads at 12. 3% versus -30. 3% for BSLK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPRU leads at 51. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BSLK or SPRU or SHLS or RUN or CWEN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.

(SHLS) trades at 19. 4x forward P/E versus 22. 8x for Sunrun Inc. — 3. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RUN: 31. 4% to $18. 14.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BSLK or SPRU or SHLS or RUN or CWEN?

In this comparison, CWEN (7.

9% yield) pays a dividend. BSLK, SPRU, SHLS, RUN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BSLK or SPRU or SHLS or RUN or CWEN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Clearway Energy, Inc.

(CWEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54), 7. 9% yield, +237. 4% 10Y return). Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. (BSLK) carries a higher beta of 2. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWEN: +237. 4%, BSLK: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BSLK and SPRU and SHLS and RUN and CWEN?

These companies operate in different sectors (BSLK (Financial Services) and SPRU (Energy) and SHLS (Energy) and RUN (Energy) and CWEN (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BSLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPRU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock; RUN is a small-cap high-growth stock; CWEN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. CWEN pays a dividend while BSLK, SPRU, SHLS, RUN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BSLK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $2B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SPRU

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 21%
  • Gross Margin > 36%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHLS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 37%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RUN

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 21%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CWEN

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BSLK and SPRU and SHLS and RUN and CWEN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BSLK: -60.1% · SPRU: 43.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.