Financial - Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BSLKW vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
BSLKW vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Conglomerates | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $4K | $12.24B | $8.98B | $9.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $2.68B | $4.03B | $8.10B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-24M | $460M | $-185M | $599M |
| Gross Margin | -6.8% | 29.1% | 24.9% | 26.9% |
| Operating Margin | -30.3% | 21.0% | 11.8% | 12.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 25.2x | 16.4x | 10.5x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $250M | $3.07B | $3.60B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $497M | $214M | $539M |
BSLKW vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bolt Projects Holdi… (BSLKW) | 100 | 2.7 | -97.3% |
| Medpace Holdings, I… (MEDP) | 100 | 109.4 | +9.4% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 68.4 | -31.6% |
| ICON Public Limited… (ICLR) | 100 | 36.0 | -64.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BSLKW vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BSLKW plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
MEDP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.26
- Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 21.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.1%
- 14.4% 10Y total return vs CRL's 119.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 54.6%, current ratio 0.74x
CRL is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.52, current ratio 1.29x
ICLR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (10.5x vs 16.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.0% revenue growth vs BSLKW's -60.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.5x vs 16.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.2% margin vs BSLKW's -47.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.26 vs ICLR's 1.60 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.9% vs BSLKW's -76.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.8% ROA vs BSLKW's -218.1% |
BSLKW vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BSLKW vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MEDP leads in 3 of 6 categories
ICLR leads 1 • BSLKW leads 0 • CRL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MEDP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICLR is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.1B annually — 5901.4x BSLKW's $1M. MEDP is the more profitable business, keeping 17.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BSLKW's -47.6%. On growth, MEDP holds the edge at +26.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $2.7B | $4.0B | $8.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$20M | $577M | $757M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$24M | $460M | -$185M | $599M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $745M | $391M | $996M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -6.8% | +29.1% | +24.9% | +26.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -30.3% | +21.0% | +11.8% | +12.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -47.6% | +17.2% | -4.6% | +7.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.8% | +27.8% | +9.7% | +12.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +26.5% | +1.2% | +0.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -142.1% | +16.6% | -160.0% | -98.7% |
Valuation Metrics
ICLR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.1x trailing earnings, ICLR trades at a 53% valuation discount to MEDP's 28.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MEDP offers better value at 0.88x vs ICLR's 1.87x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3,789 | $12.2B | $9.0B | $9.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $12.0B | $11.8B | $12.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | 28.06x | -62.52x | 13.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.24x | 16.42x | 10.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.88x | — | 1.87x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 21.31x | 12.98x | 7.95x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 4.84x | 2.24x | 1.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 27.57x | 2.81x | 1.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.96x | 17.31x | 8.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP delivers a 120.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $121 in annual profit, vs $-6 for CRL. ICLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRL's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICLR scores 7/9 vs CRL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +120.9% | -5.7% | +6.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.2% | +24.8% | -2.5% | +3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +154.9% | +6.3% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -35.0% | +65.7% | +8.1% | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.55x | 0.95x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10M | -$247M | $2.9B | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $497M | $214M | $539M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $250M | $3.1B | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -14.88x | — | 6.38x | 3.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MEDP five years ago would be worth $25,938 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $263 for BSLKW. Over the past 12 months, MEDP leads with a +42.9% total return vs BSLKW's -76.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MEDP at 27.0% vs BSLKW's -70.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -70.9% | -24.9% | -10.1% | -33.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -76.0% | +42.9% | +32.8% | -10.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.4% | +104.6% | -4.2% | -34.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.4% | +159.4% | -46.9% | -45.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.4% | +1442.7% | +119.2% | +91.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -70.3% | +27.0% | -1.4% | -13.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BSLKW and CRL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BSLKW is the less volatile stock with a -0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICLR's 1.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRL currently trades 79.5% from its 52-week high vs BSLKW's 3.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.11x | 1.26x | 1.52x | 1.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.15 | $628.92 | $228.88 | $211.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $284.48 | $131.30 | $66.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.2% | +68.2% | +79.5% | +59.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.7 | 40.6 | 57.2 | 62.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 24K | 371K | 806K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MEDP as "Hold", CRL as "Buy", ICLR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.7% upside for ICLR (target: $150) vs 12.9% for CRL (target: $205).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $498.86 | $205.43 | $149.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 19 | 36 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.5% | +4.0% | +5.2% |
MEDP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ICLR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BSLKW vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BSLKW or MEDP or CRL or ICLR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -60. 1% for Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. (BSLKW). ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BSLKW or MEDP or CRL or ICLR?
On trailing P/E, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) is the cheapest at 13.
1x versus Medpace Holdings, Inc. at 28. 1x. On forward P/E, ICON Public Limited Company is actually cheaper at 10. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Medpace Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 79x versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 50x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BSLKW or MEDP or CRL or ICLR?
Over the past 5 years, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) delivered a total return of +159. 4%, compared to -97. 4% for Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. (BSLKW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MEDP returned +1443% versus BSLKW's -97. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BSLKW or MEDP or CRL or ICLR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc.
(BSLKW) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 11β versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 60β — meaning ICLR is approximately -1597% more volatile than BSLKW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 95% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BSLKW or MEDP or CRL or ICLR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -60. 1% for Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. (BSLKW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ICON Public Limited Company grew EPS 28. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MEDP leads at 20. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BSLKW or MEDP or CRL or ICLR?
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 8% net margin versus -47. 6% for Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MEDP leads at 21. 1% versus -30. 3% for BSLKW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRL leads at 30. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BSLKW or MEDP or CRL or ICLR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 79x versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 50x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 25. 2x for Medpace Holdings, Inc. — 14. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICLR: 19. 7% to $149. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — BSLKW or MEDP or CRL or ICLR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BSLKW or MEDP or CRL or ICLR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc.
(BSLKW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 11)). ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) carries a higher beta of 1. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BSLKW: -97. 4%, ICLR: +91. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BSLKW and MEDP and CRL and ICLR?
These companies operate in different sectors (BSLKW (Financial Services) and MEDP (Healthcare) and CRL (Healthcare) and ICLR (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BSLKW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MEDP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ICLR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.