Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BSLKW vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BSLKW
Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Conglomerates

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4K
5Y Perf.-97.3%
MEDP
Medpace Holdings, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$12.24B
5Y Perf.+9.4%
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.98B
5Y Perf.-31.6%
ICLR
ICON Public Limited Company

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • IE
Market Cap$9.54B
5Y Perf.-64.0%

BSLKW vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BSLKW logoBSLKW
MEDP logoMEDP
CRL logoCRL
ICLR logoICLR
IndustryFinancial - ConglomeratesMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$4K$12.24B$8.98B$9.54B
Revenue (TTM)$1M$2.68B$4.03B$8.10B
Net Income (TTM)$-24M$460M$-185M$599M
Gross Margin-6.8%29.1%24.9%26.9%
Operating Margin-30.3%21.0%11.8%12.2%
Forward P/E25.2x16.4x10.5x
Total Debt$13M$250M$3.07B$3.60B
Cash & Equiv.$4M$497M$214M$539M

BSLKW vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BSLKW
MEDP
CRL
ICLR
StockJul 24May 26Return
Bolt Projects Holdi… (BSLKW)1002.7-97.3%
Medpace Holdings, I… (MEDP)100109.4+9.4%
Charles River Labor… (CRL)10068.4-31.6%
ICON Public Limited… (ICLR)10036.0-64.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BSLKW vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MEDP leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. ICON Public Limited Company is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BSLKW
Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc.
The Financial Play

BSLKW plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: financial services exposure
MEDP
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

MEDP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 1.26
  • Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 21.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.1%
  • 14.4% 10Y total return vs CRL's 119.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 54.6%, current ratio 0.74x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

CRL is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 1.52, current ratio 1.29x
Best for: defensive
ICLR
ICON Public Limited Company
The Value Play

ICLR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (10.5x vs 16.4x)
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMEDP logoMEDP20.0% revenue growth vs BSLKW's -60.1%
ValueICLR logoICLRLower P/E (10.5x vs 16.4x)
Quality / MarginsMEDP logoMEDP17.2% margin vs BSLKW's -47.6%
Stability / SafetyMEDP logoMEDPBeta 1.26 vs ICLR's 1.60
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MEDP logoMEDP+42.9% vs BSLKW's -76.0%
Efficiency (ROA)MEDP logoMEDP24.8% ROA vs BSLKW's -218.1%

BSLKW vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BSLKWBolt Projects Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MEDPMedpace Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Oncology
29.5%$748M
Metabolic
29.4%$745M
Other
16.1%$409M
Central Nervous System
10.1%$255M
Cardiology
9.5%$239M
Antiviral And Anti Infective
5.3%$135M
CRLCharles River Laboratories International, Inc.
FY 2025
Discovery and Safety Assessment
59.8%$2.4B
Research Models and Services
21.1%$846M
Manufacturing Support
19.1%$766M
ICLRICON Public Limited Company
FY 2012
Clinical Research
92.2%$1.0B
Central Laboratory
7.8%$87M

BSLKW vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMEDPLAGGINGCRL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MEDP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

ICLR is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.1B annually — 5901.4x BSLKW's $1M. MEDP is the more profitable business, keeping 17.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BSLKW's -47.6%. On growth, MEDP holds the edge at +26.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBSLKW logoBSLKWBolt Projects Hol…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…ICLR logoICLRICON Public Limit…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1M$2.7B$4.0B$8.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$20M$577M$757M$1.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$24M$460M-$185M$599M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$5M$745M$391M$996M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-6.8%+29.1%+24.9%+26.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-30.3%+21.0%+11.8%+12.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-47.6%+17.2%-4.6%+7.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-11.8%+27.8%+9.7%+12.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+26.5%+1.2%+0.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-142.1%+16.6%-160.0%-98.7%
MEDP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ICLR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 13.1x trailing earnings, ICLR trades at a 53% valuation discount to MEDP's 28.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MEDP offers better value at 0.88x vs ICLR's 1.87x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricBSLKW logoBSLKWBolt Projects Hol…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…ICLR logoICLRICON Public Limit…
Market CapShares × price$3,789$12.2B$9.0B$9.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$10M$12.0B$11.8B$12.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.00x28.06x-62.52x13.12x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.24x16.42x10.53x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.88x1.87x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple21.31x12.98x7.95x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.00x4.84x2.24x1.15x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share27.57x2.81x1.09x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF17.96x17.31x8.53x
ICLR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

MEDP delivers a 120.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $121 in annual profit, vs $-6 for CRL. ICLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRL's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICLR scores 7/9 vs CRL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBSLKW logoBSLKWBolt Projects Hol…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…ICLR logoICLRICON Public Limit…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+120.9%-5.7%+6.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.2%+24.8%-2.5%+3.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+154.9%+6.3%+6.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-35.0%+65.7%+8.1%+7.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95647
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.55x0.95x0.38x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$10M-$247M$2.9B$3.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$4M$497M$214M$539M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$13M$250M$3.1B$3.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-14.88x6.38x3.96x
MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MEDP five years ago would be worth $25,938 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $263 for BSLKW. Over the past 12 months, MEDP leads with a +42.9% total return vs BSLKW's -76.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MEDP at 27.0% vs BSLKW's -70.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBSLKW logoBSLKWBolt Projects Hol…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…ICLR logoICLRICON Public Limit…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-70.9%-24.9%-10.1%-33.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-76.0%+42.9%+32.8%-10.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.4%+104.6%-4.2%-34.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.4%+159.4%-46.9%-45.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.4%+1442.7%+119.2%+91.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-70.3%+27.0%-1.4%-13.0%
MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BSLKW and CRL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BSLKW is the less volatile stock with a -0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICLR's 1.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRL currently trades 79.5% from its 52-week high vs BSLKW's 3.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBSLKW logoBSLKWBolt Projects Hol…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…ICLR logoICLRICON Public Limit…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.11x1.26x1.52x1.60x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$0.15$628.92$228.88$211.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.00$284.48$131.30$66.57
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+3.2%+68.2%+79.5%+59.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.740.657.262.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded24K371K806K1.1M
Evenly matched — BSLKW and CRL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: MEDP as "Hold", CRL as "Buy", ICLR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.7% upside for ICLR (target: $150) vs 12.9% for CRL (target: $205).

MetricBSLKW logoBSLKWBolt Projects Hol…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…ICLR logoICLRICON Public Limit…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$498.86$205.43$149.63
# AnalystsCovering analysts193630
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+7.5%+4.0%+5.2%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

MEDP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ICLR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallMedpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BSLKW vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BSLKW or MEDP or CRL or ICLR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.

(MEDP) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -60. 1% for Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. (BSLKW). ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BSLKW or MEDP or CRL or ICLR?

On trailing P/E, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) is the cheapest at 13.

1x versus Medpace Holdings, Inc. at 28. 1x. On forward P/E, ICON Public Limited Company is actually cheaper at 10. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Medpace Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 79x versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 50x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BSLKW or MEDP or CRL or ICLR?

Over the past 5 years, Medpace Holdings, Inc.

(MEDP) delivered a total return of +159. 4%, compared to -97. 4% for Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. (BSLKW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MEDP returned +1443% versus BSLKW's -97. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BSLKW or MEDP or CRL or ICLR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc.

(BSLKW) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 11β versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 60β — meaning ICLR is approximately -1597% more volatile than BSLKW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 95% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BSLKW or MEDP or CRL or ICLR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Medpace Holdings, Inc.

(MEDP) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -60. 1% for Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. (BSLKW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ICON Public Limited Company grew EPS 28. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MEDP leads at 20. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BSLKW or MEDP or CRL or ICLR?

Medpace Holdings, Inc.

(MEDP) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 8% net margin versus -47. 6% for Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MEDP leads at 21. 1% versus -30. 3% for BSLKW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRL leads at 30. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BSLKW or MEDP or CRL or ICLR more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 79x versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 50x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 25. 2x for Medpace Holdings, Inc. — 14. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICLR: 19. 7% to $149. 63.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BSLKW or MEDP or CRL or ICLR?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is BSLKW or MEDP or CRL or ICLR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc.

(BSLKW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 11)). ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) carries a higher beta of 1. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BSLKW: -97. 4%, ICLR: +91. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BSLKW and MEDP and CRL and ICLR?

These companies operate in different sectors (BSLKW (Financial Services) and MEDP (Healthcare) and CRL (Healthcare) and ICLR (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BSLKW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MEDP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ICLR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BSLKW

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $500M
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MEDP

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CRL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ICLR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BSLKW and MEDP and CRL and ICLR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BSLKW: -60.1% · MEDP: 26.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.