Asset Management
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BTTC vs DXLG vs TLYS vs CATO vs PVH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Manufacturers
BTTC vs DXLG vs TLYS vs CATO vs PVH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $5M | $39M | $118M | $52M | $3.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $442M | $554M | $660M | $8.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $210K | $-8M | $-17M | $-10M | $469M |
| Gross Margin | 33.0% | 44.4% | 29.7% | 32.2% | 58.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | -2.3% | -3.5% | -2.4% | 7.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 7.6x |
| Total Debt | $302K | $0.00 | $170M | $146M | $3.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $575K | $24M | $46M | $20M | $748M |
BTTC vs DXLG vs TLYS vs CATO vs PVH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Destination XL Grou… (DXLG) | 100 | 166.1 | +66.1% |
| Tilly's, Inc. (TLYS) | 100 | 76.4 | -23.6% |
| The Cato Corporation (CATO) | 100 | 30.0 | -70.0% |
| PVH Corp. (PVH) | 100 | 181.4 | +81.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BTTC vs DXLG vs TLYS vs CATO vs PVH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BTTC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 31.7%, current ratio 1.47x
- 26.3% NII/revenue growth vs CATO's -8.2%
- 7.8% margin vs TLYS's -3.2%
Among these 5 stocks, DXLG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TLYS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth -2.8%, EPS growth 62.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.3%
- 68.9% 10Y total return vs PVH's -0.5%
- Beta 0.64 vs DXLG's 2.11
- +237.1% vs BTTC's -71.2%
CATO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 18.8%
- Beta 0.70, yield 18.8%, current ratio 1.19x
- 18.8% yield, vs PVH's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
PVH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and efficiency.
- Better valuation composite
- 4.0% ROA vs TLYS's -5.3%, ROIC 7.0% vs -6.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.3% NII/revenue growth vs CATO's -8.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.8% margin vs TLYS's -3.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs DXLG's 2.11 | |
| Dividends | 18.8% yield, vs PVH's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +237.1% vs BTTC's -71.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.0% ROA vs TLYS's -5.3%, ROIC 7.0% vs -6.0% |
BTTC vs DXLG vs TLYS vs CATO vs PVH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BTTC vs DXLG vs TLYS vs CATO vs PVH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BTTC leads in 2 of 6 categories
DXLG leads 0 • TLYS leads 0 • CATO leads 0 • PVH leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTTC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PVH is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.8B annually — 3271.4x BTTC's $3M. BTTC is the more profitable business, keeping 7.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TLYS's -3.2%. On growth, CATO holds the edge at +6.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $442M | $554M | $660M | $8.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $201,799 | $5M | -$9M | -$5M | $924M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $209,911 | -$8M | -$17M | -$10M | $469M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $270,793 | -$11M | $3M | -$7M | $516M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.0% | +44.4% | +29.7% | +32.2% | +58.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | -2.3% | -3.5% | -2.4% | +7.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | -1.7% | -3.2% | -1.5% | +5.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | -2.6% | +0.6% | -1.1% | +5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -5.2% | +5.3% | +6.3% | +4.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | -137.7% | +121.6% | +64.6% | +65.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CATO and PVH each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PVH's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BTTC's 16.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5M | $39M | $118M | $52M | $3.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5M | $15M | $242M | $178M | $6.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -1.08x | -6.74x | -3.00x | 7.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 7.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.15x | — | — | — | 6.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.84x | 0.09x | 0.21x | 0.08x | 0.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.78x | 0.36x | 1.39x | 0.35x | 0.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.24x | 20.86x | — | — | 6.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BTTC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PVH delivers a 9.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-21 for TLYS. BTTC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TLYS's 2.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTTC scores 7/9 vs CATO's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.0% | -5.5% | -21.3% | -5.8% | +9.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.0% | -1.9% | -5.3% | -2.2% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.3% | -6.8% | -6.0% | -6.7% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.9% | -6.4% | -8.5% | -9.6% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.32x | — | 2.00x | 0.90x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$272,962 | -$24M | $124M | $126M | $2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $575,111 | $24M | $46M | $20M | $748M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $302,149 | $0 | $170M | $146M | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 16.10x | — | — | -1.77x | 2.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TLYS and PVH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PVH five years ago would be worth $7,849 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,876 for BTTC. Over the past 12 months, TLYS leads with a +237.1% total return vs BTTC's -71.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PVH at -0.3% vs DXLG's -45.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.1% | -21.1% | +93.6% | -3.0% | +21.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -71.2% | -35.5% | +237.1% | +9.8% | +4.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.2% | -84.0% | -51.0% | -52.2% | -0.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.2% | -56.2% | -49.1% | -59.2% | -21.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.2% | -85.5% | +68.9% | -71.3% | -0.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -34.0% | -45.8% | -21.2% | -21.8% | -0.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TLYS and PVH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TLYS is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DXLG's 2.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PVH currently trades 82.4% from its 52-week high vs BTTC's 3.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 2.11x | 0.64x | 0.70x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.00 | $1.69 | $5.52 | $4.92 | $100.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.21 | $0.43 | $0.57 | $2.41 | $59.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.3% | +42.0% | +70.8% | +59.1% | +82.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.2 | 55.6 | 43.5 | 50.4 | 43.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 44K | 152K | 1.4M | 58K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TLYS and CATO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TLYS as "Hold", PVH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 143.0% upside for TLYS (target: $10) vs 21.2% for PVH (target: $100). For income investors, CATO offers the higher dividend yield at 18.77% vs PVH's 0.18%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $9.50 | — | $100.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 17 | — | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +18.8% | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.55 | $0.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +35.4% | 0.0% | +7.4% | +13.9% |
BTTC leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 4 categories are tied.
BTTC vs DXLG vs TLYS vs CATO vs PVH: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BTTC or DXLG or TLYS or CATO or PVH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Black Titan Corporation (BTTC) is the stronger pick with 26.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 2% for The Cato Corporation (CATO). PVH Corp. (PVH) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E (7. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PVH Corp. (PVH) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BTTC or DXLG or TLYS or CATO or PVH?
Over the past 5 years, PVH Corp.
(PVH) delivered a total return of -21. 5%, compared to -71. 2% for Black Titan Corporation (BTTC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TLYS returned +68. 9% versus DXLG's -85. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BTTC or DXLG or TLYS or CATO or PVH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tilly's, Inc.
(TLYS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus Destination XL Group, Inc. 's 2. 11β — meaning DXLG is approximately 228% more volatile than TLYS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Black Titan Corporation (BTTC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 2% for Tilly's, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BTTC or DXLG or TLYS or CATO or PVH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Black Titan Corporation (BTTC) is pulling ahead at 26.
3% versus -8. 2% for The Cato Corporation (CATO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tilly's, Inc. grew EPS 62. 3% year-over-year, compared to -1420. 0% for Destination XL Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PVH leads at -1. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BTTC or DXLG or TLYS or CATO or PVH?
Black Titan Corporation (BTTC) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
8% net margin versus -8. 3% for Destination XL Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PVH leads at 8. 5% versus -4. 2% for DXLG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PVH leads at 59. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BTTC or DXLG or TLYS or CATO or PVH more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TLYS: 143.
0% to $9. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — BTTC or DXLG or TLYS or CATO or PVH?
In this comparison, CATO (18.
8% yield), PVH (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. BTTC, DXLG, TLYS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is BTTC or DXLG or TLYS or CATO or PVH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Cato Corporation (CATO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
70), 18. 8% yield). Destination XL Group, Inc. (DXLG) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CATO: -71. 3%, DXLG: -85. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BTTC and DXLG and TLYS and CATO and PVH?
These companies operate in different sectors (BTTC (Financial Services) and DXLG (Consumer Cyclical) and TLYS (Consumer Cyclical) and CATO (Consumer Cyclical) and PVH (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BTTC is a small-cap high-growth stock; DXLG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TLYS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CATO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PVH is a small-cap deep-value stock. CATO pays a dividend while BTTC, DXLG, TLYS, PVH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.