Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BURU vs ADSK vs PTC vs IPGP vs CDNS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Semiconductors
Software - Application
BURU vs ADSK vs PTC vs IPGP vs CDNS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Software - Application | Software - Application | Semiconductors | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1M | $53.72B | $17.57B | $4.31B | $98.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $109K | $6.78B | $3.00B | $1.04B | $5.30B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-63M | $1.12B | $1.25B | $29M | $1.11B |
| Gross Margin | -392.0% | 96.8% | 84.7% | 37.6% | 86.4% |
| Operating Margin | -116.1% | 23.3% | 38.7% | 0.3% | 31.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.2x | 19.2x | 62.6x | 45.0x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $2.73B | $1.37B | $0.00 | $2.48B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $209K | $2.25B | $184M | $404M | $3.00B |
BURU vs ADSK vs PTC vs IPGP vs CDNS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nuburu, Inc. (BURU) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) | 100 | 103.8 | +3.8% |
| PTC Inc. (PTC) | 100 | 174.8 | +74.8% |
| IPG Photonics Corpo… (IPGP) | 100 | 63.9 | -36.1% |
| Cadence Design Syst… (CDNS) | 100 | 331.6 | +231.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BURU vs ADSK vs PTC vs IPGP vs CDNS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BURU lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ADSK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.85
- Beta 0.85, current ratio 0.85x
- Beta 0.85 vs IPGP's 1.80
PTC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 19.2%, EPS growth 94.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.96, Low D/E 35.8%, current ratio 1.12x
- PEG 0.48 vs CDNS's 3.21
- 19.2% revenue growth vs BURU's -92.7%
IPGP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +75.6% vs BURU's -65.9%
CDNS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 14.1% 10Y total return vs ADSK's 327.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.2% revenue growth vs BURU's -92.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.2x vs 45.0x), PEG 0.48 vs 3.21 | |
| Quality / Margins | 41.6% margin vs BURU's -578.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.85 vs IPGP's 1.80 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +75.6% vs BURU's -65.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.3% ROA vs BURU's -479.1% |
BURU vs ADSK vs PTC vs IPGP vs CDNS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BURU vs ADSK vs PTC vs IPGP vs CDNS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PTC leads in 2 of 6 categories
ADSK leads 1 • CDNS leads 1 • IPGP leads 1 • BURU leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PTC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADSK is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.8B annually — 62215.4x BURU's $108,912. PTC is the more profitable business, keeping 41.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BURU's -578.5%. On growth, PTC holds the edge at +21.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $108,912 | $6.8B | $3.0B | $1.0B | $5.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$39M | $1.7B | $1.2B | $55M | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$63M | $1.1B | $1.2B | $29M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | $2.4B | $928M | $8M | $1.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -3.9% | +96.8% | +84.7% | +37.6% | +86.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -116.1% | +23.3% | +38.7% | +0.3% | +31.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -578.5% | +16.6% | +41.6% | +2.8% | +20.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -69.8% | +35.4% | +31.0% | +0.8% | +30.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -6.5% | +21.7% | +16.6% | +6.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +82.1% | +6.0% | +2.7% | -54.4% | +14.5% |
Valuation Metrics
PTC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.3x trailing earnings, PTC trades at a 83% valuation discount to IPGP's 139.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PTC offers better value at 0.60x vs CDNS's 6.29x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $53.7B | $17.6B | $4.3B | $98.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11M | $54.2B | $18.8B | $3.9B | $98.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | 48.00x | 24.28x | 139.22x | 87.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.22x | 19.23x | 62.62x | 44.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.60x | — | 6.29x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 34.35x | 16.78x | 48.90x | 52.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.14x | 7.93x | 6.41x | 4.30x | 18.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 17.73x | 4.66x | 2.04x | 17.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.30x | 20.51x | — | 62.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ADSK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ADSK delivers a 36.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $1 for IPGP. PTC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ADSK's 0.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTC scores 8/9 vs BURU's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +36.9% | +33.1% | +1.4% | +21.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.8% | +9.0% | +19.3% | +1.2% | +11.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +33.3% | +14.9% | +0.6% | +25.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +25.6% | +19.5% | +0.6% | +20.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.90x | 0.36x | — | 0.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9M | $485M | $1.2B | -$404M | -$521M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $209,337 | $2.2B | $184M | $404M | $3.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $2.7B | $1.4B | $0 | $2.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.34x | 289.00x | 24.32x | — | 14.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CDNS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CDNS five years ago would be worth $27,656 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6 for BURU. Over the past 12 months, IPGP leads with a +75.6% total return vs BURU's -65.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CDNS at 20.2% vs BURU's -89.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -76.1% | -12.4% | -13.2% | +35.8% | +15.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -65.9% | -11.4% | -8.3% | +75.6% | +15.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +30.8% | +13.9% | -12.7% | +73.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -12.1% | +12.6% | -48.5% | +176.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +327.0% | +315.1% | +20.2% | +1411.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -89.2% | +9.4% | +4.4% | -4.4% | +20.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ADSK and CDNS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADSK is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IPGP's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CDNS currently trades 94.8% from its 52-week high vs BURU's 5.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 0.78x | 0.89x | 1.80x | 1.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.24 | $329.09 | $219.69 | $155.82 | $376.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.15 | $214.10 | $130.94 | $53.98 | $262.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +5.6% | +76.3% | +67.2% | +65.2% | +94.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.7 | 52.4 | 41.4 | 39.7 | 70.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 41.8M | 1.9M | 1.2M | 510K | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
IPGP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ADSK as "Buy", PTC as "Buy", IPGP as "Buy", CDNS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.2% upside for IPGP (target: $152) vs 3.9% for CDNS (target: $371).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $338.00 | $194.80 | $151.67 | $370.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 51 | 33 | 27 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.6% | +1.7% | +1.3% | +0.9% |
PTC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ADSK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
BURU vs ADSK vs PTC vs IPGP vs CDNS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BURU or ADSK or PTC or IPGP or CDNS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PTC Inc.
(PTC) is the stronger pick with 19. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -92. 7% for Nuburu, Inc. (BURU). PTC Inc. (PTC) offers the better valuation at 24. 3x trailing P/E (19. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) a "Buy" — based on 51 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BURU or ADSK or PTC or IPGP or CDNS?
On trailing P/E, PTC Inc.
(PTC) is the cheapest at 24. 3x versus IPG Photonics Corporation at 139. 2x. On forward P/E, PTC Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: PTC Inc. wins at 0. 48x versus Cadence Design Systems, Inc. 's 3. 21x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BURU or ADSK or PTC or IPGP or CDNS?
Over the past 5 years, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
(CDNS) delivered a total return of +176. 6%, compared to -99. 9% for Nuburu, Inc. (BURU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CDNS returned +1436% versus BURU's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BURU or ADSK or PTC or IPGP or CDNS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Autodesk, Inc.
(ADSK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 78β versus IPG Photonics Corporation's 1. 80β — meaning IPGP is approximately 131% more volatile than ADSK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PTC Inc. (PTC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 90% for Autodesk, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BURU or ADSK or PTC or IPGP or CDNS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PTC Inc.
(PTC) is pulling ahead at 19. 2% versus -92. 7% for Nuburu, Inc. (BURU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IPG Photonics Corporation grew EPS 117. 8% year-over-year, compared to 2. 1% for Autodesk, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CDNS leads at 14. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BURU or ADSK or PTC or IPGP or CDNS?
PTC Inc.
(PTC) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 8% net margin versus -226. 9% for Nuburu, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTC leads at 35. 9% versus -86. 4% for BURU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ADSK leads at 96. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BURU or ADSK or PTC or IPGP or CDNS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, PTC Inc. (PTC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 48x versus Cadence Design Systems, Inc. 's 3. 21x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PTC Inc. (PTC) trades at 19. 2x forward P/E versus 62. 6x for IPG Photonics Corporation — 43. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IPGP: 49. 2% to $151. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — BURU or ADSK or PTC or IPGP or CDNS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BURU or ADSK or PTC or IPGP or CDNS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
(CDNS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1436% 10Y return). IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CDNS: +1436%, IPGP: +20. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BURU and ADSK and PTC and IPGP and CDNS?
These companies operate in different sectors (BURU (Industrials) and ADSK (Technology) and PTC (Technology) and IPGP (Technology) and CDNS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BURU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ADSK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PTC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; IPGP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CDNS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.