Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BURU vs ADSK vs PTC vs IPGP vs CDNS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BURU
Nuburu, Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsAMEX • US
Market Cap$1M
5Y Perf.-99.9%
ADSK
Autodesk, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$53.72B
5Y Perf.+3.8%
PTC
PTC Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$17.57B
5Y Perf.+74.8%
IPGP
IPG Photonics Corporation

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.31B
5Y Perf.-36.1%
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$98.54B
5Y Perf.+231.6%

BURU vs ADSK vs PTC vs IPGP vs CDNS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BURU logoBURU
ADSK logoADSK
PTC logoPTC
IPGP logoIPGP
CDNS logoCDNS
IndustryIndustrial - MachinerySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationSemiconductorsSoftware - Application
Market Cap$1M$53.72B$17.57B$4.31B$98.54B
Revenue (TTM)$109K$6.78B$3.00B$1.04B$5.30B
Net Income (TTM)$-63M$1.12B$1.25B$29M$1.11B
Gross Margin-392.0%96.8%84.7%37.6%86.4%
Operating Margin-116.1%23.3%38.7%0.3%31.1%
Forward P/E20.2x19.2x62.6x45.0x
Total Debt$9M$2.73B$1.37B$0.00$2.48B
Cash & Equiv.$209K$2.25B$184M$404M$3.00B

BURU vs ADSK vs PTC vs IPGP vs CDNSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BURU
ADSK
PTC
IPGP
CDNS
StockOct 20May 26Return
Nuburu, Inc. (BURU)1000.1-99.9%
Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK)100103.8+3.8%
PTC Inc. (PTC)100174.8+74.8%
IPG Photonics Corpo… (IPGP)10063.9-36.1%
Cadence Design Syst… (CDNS)100331.6+231.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BURU vs ADSK vs PTC vs IPGP vs CDNS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PTC leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Autodesk, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. IPGP also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BURU
Nuburu, Inc.
The Industrials Pick

BURU lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
ADSK
Autodesk, Inc.
The Income Pick

ADSK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.85
  • Beta 0.85, current ratio 0.85x
  • Beta 0.85 vs IPGP's 1.80
Best for: income & stability and defensive
PTC
PTC Inc.
The Growth Play

PTC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 19.2%, EPS growth 94.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.96, Low D/E 35.8%, current ratio 1.12x
  • PEG 0.48 vs CDNS's 3.21
  • 19.2% revenue growth vs BURU's -92.7%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
IPGP
IPG Photonics Corporation
The Momentum Pick

IPGP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +75.6% vs BURU's -65.9%
Best for: momentum
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CDNS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 14.1% 10Y total return vs ADSK's 327.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPTC logoPTC19.2% revenue growth vs BURU's -92.7%
ValuePTC logoPTCLower P/E (19.2x vs 45.0x), PEG 0.48 vs 3.21
Quality / MarginsPTC logoPTC41.6% margin vs BURU's -578.5%
Stability / SafetyADSK logoADSKBeta 0.85 vs IPGP's 1.80
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)IPGP logoIPGP+75.6% vs BURU's -65.9%
Efficiency (ROA)PTC logoPTC19.3% ROA vs BURU's -479.1%

BURU vs ADSK vs PTC vs IPGP vs CDNS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BURUNuburu, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ADSKAutodesk, Inc.
FY 2025
Architecture Engineering And Construction
47.9%$2.9B
AutoCAD and AutoCAD LT Family
25.6%$1.6B
Manufacturing
19.4%$1.2B
Media And Entertainment [member]
5.1%$315M
Other
1.9%$118M
PTCPTC Inc.
FY 2025
Support And Cloud Services
53.6%$1.5B
License
42.4%$1.2B
Technology Service
3.9%$107M
IPGPIPG Photonics Corporation
FY 2025
High Power Continuous Wave CW Lasers
41.8%$309M
Laser And Non-Laser Systems
19.9%$147M
Pulsed Lasers
19.4%$143M
Medium And Low Power CW Lasers
11.9%$88M
Quasi-Continuous Wave QCW Lasers
7.0%$52M
CDNSCadence Design Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Product and maintenance
91.0%$4.8B
Technology Service
9.0%$475M

BURU vs ADSK vs PTC vs IPGP vs CDNS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPTCLAGGINGBURU

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

PTC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

ADSK is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.8B annually — 62215.4x BURU's $108,912. PTC is the more profitable business, keeping 41.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BURU's -578.5%. On growth, PTC holds the edge at +21.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBURU logoBURUNuburu, Inc.ADSK logoADSKAutodesk, Inc.PTC logoPTCPTC Inc.IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…CDNS logoCDNSCadence Design Sy…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$108,912$6.8B$3.0B$1.0B$5.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$39M$1.7B$1.2B$55M$1.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$63M$1.1B$1.2B$29M$1.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$8M$2.4B$928M$8M$1.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-3.9%+96.8%+84.7%+37.6%+86.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-116.1%+23.3%+38.7%+0.3%+31.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-578.5%+16.6%+41.6%+2.8%+20.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-69.8%+35.4%+31.0%+0.8%+30.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-6.5%+21.7%+16.6%+6.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+82.1%+6.0%+2.7%-54.4%+14.5%
PTC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PTC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 24.3x trailing earnings, PTC trades at a 83% valuation discount to IPGP's 139.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PTC offers better value at 0.60x vs CDNS's 6.29x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricBURU logoBURUNuburu, Inc.ADSK logoADSKAutodesk, Inc.PTC logoPTCPTC Inc.IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…CDNS logoCDNSCadence Design Sy…
Market CapShares × price$1M$53.7B$17.6B$4.3B$98.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$11M$54.2B$18.8B$3.9B$98.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.04x48.00x24.28x139.22x87.91x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.22x19.23x62.62x44.96x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.60x6.29x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple34.35x16.78x48.90x52.04x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue9.14x7.93x6.41x4.30x18.60x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share17.73x4.66x2.04x17.82x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF22.30x20.51x62.09x
PTC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ADSK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

ADSK delivers a 36.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $1 for IPGP. PTC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ADSK's 0.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTC scores 8/9 vs BURU's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBURU logoBURUNuburu, Inc.ADSK logoADSKAutodesk, Inc.PTC logoPTCPTC Inc.IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…CDNS logoCDNSCadence Design Sy…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+36.9%+33.1%+1.4%+21.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-4.8%+9.0%+19.3%+1.2%+11.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+33.3%+14.9%+0.6%+25.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+25.6%+19.5%+0.6%+20.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–917867
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.90x0.36x0.45x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$9M$485M$1.2B-$404M-$521M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$209,337$2.2B$184M$404M$3.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$9M$2.7B$1.4B$0$2.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-4.34x289.00x24.32x14.06x
ADSK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CDNS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CDNS five years ago would be worth $27,656 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6 for BURU. Over the past 12 months, IPGP leads with a +75.6% total return vs BURU's -65.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CDNS at 20.2% vs BURU's -89.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBURU logoBURUNuburu, Inc.ADSK logoADSKAutodesk, Inc.PTC logoPTCPTC Inc.IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…CDNS logoCDNSCadence Design Sy…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-76.1%-12.4%-13.2%+35.8%+15.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-65.9%-11.4%-8.3%+75.6%+15.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%+30.8%+13.9%-12.7%+73.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-12.1%+12.6%-48.5%+176.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%+327.0%+315.1%+20.2%+1411.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-89.2%+9.4%+4.4%-4.4%+20.2%
CDNS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ADSK and CDNS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ADSK is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IPGP's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CDNS currently trades 94.8% from its 52-week high vs BURU's 5.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBURU logoBURUNuburu, Inc.ADSK logoADSKAutodesk, Inc.PTC logoPTCPTC Inc.IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…CDNS logoCDNSCadence Design Sy…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.21x0.78x0.89x1.80x1.46x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.24$329.09$219.69$155.82$376.45
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.15$214.10$130.94$53.98$262.75
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+5.6%+76.3%+67.2%+65.2%+94.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10047.752.441.439.770.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded41.8M1.9M1.2M510K2.3M
Evenly matched — ADSK and CDNS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

IPGP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: ADSK as "Buy", PTC as "Buy", IPGP as "Buy", CDNS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.2% upside for IPGP (target: $152) vs 3.9% for CDNS (target: $371).

MetricBURU logoBURUNuburu, Inc.ADSK logoADSKAutodesk, Inc.PTC logoPTCPTC Inc.IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…CDNS logoCDNSCadence Design Sy…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$338.00$194.80$151.67$370.83
# AnalystsCovering analysts51332731
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises010
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.6%+1.7%+1.3%+0.9%
IPGP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

PTC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ADSK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallPTC Inc. (PTC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BURU vs ADSK vs PTC vs IPGP vs CDNS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BURU or ADSK or PTC or IPGP or CDNS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, PTC Inc.

(PTC) is the stronger pick with 19. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -92. 7% for Nuburu, Inc. (BURU). PTC Inc. (PTC) offers the better valuation at 24. 3x trailing P/E (19. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) a "Buy" — based on 51 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BURU or ADSK or PTC or IPGP or CDNS?

On trailing P/E, PTC Inc.

(PTC) is the cheapest at 24. 3x versus IPG Photonics Corporation at 139. 2x. On forward P/E, PTC Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: PTC Inc. wins at 0. 48x versus Cadence Design Systems, Inc. 's 3. 21x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BURU or ADSK or PTC or IPGP or CDNS?

Over the past 5 years, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

(CDNS) delivered a total return of +176. 6%, compared to -99. 9% for Nuburu, Inc. (BURU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CDNS returned +1436% versus BURU's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BURU or ADSK or PTC or IPGP or CDNS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Autodesk, Inc.

(ADSK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 78β versus IPG Photonics Corporation's 1. 80β — meaning IPGP is approximately 131% more volatile than ADSK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PTC Inc. (PTC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 90% for Autodesk, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BURU or ADSK or PTC or IPGP or CDNS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), PTC Inc.

(PTC) is pulling ahead at 19. 2% versus -92. 7% for Nuburu, Inc. (BURU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IPG Photonics Corporation grew EPS 117. 8% year-over-year, compared to 2. 1% for Autodesk, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CDNS leads at 14. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BURU or ADSK or PTC or IPGP or CDNS?

PTC Inc.

(PTC) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 8% net margin versus -226. 9% for Nuburu, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTC leads at 35. 9% versus -86. 4% for BURU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ADSK leads at 96. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BURU or ADSK or PTC or IPGP or CDNS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, PTC Inc. (PTC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 48x versus Cadence Design Systems, Inc. 's 3. 21x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PTC Inc. (PTC) trades at 19. 2x forward P/E versus 62. 6x for IPG Photonics Corporation — 43. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IPGP: 49. 2% to $151. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BURU or ADSK or PTC or IPGP or CDNS?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is BURU or ADSK or PTC or IPGP or CDNS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

(CDNS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1436% 10Y return). IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CDNS: +1436%, IPGP: +20. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BURU and ADSK and PTC and IPGP and CDNS?

These companies operate in different sectors (BURU (Industrials) and ADSK (Technology) and PTC (Technology) and IPGP (Technology) and CDNS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BURU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ADSK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PTC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; IPGP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CDNS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BURU

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ADSK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PTC

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IPGP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CDNS

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BURU and ADSK and PTC and IPGP and CDNS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BURU: -92.7% · ADSK: -6.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.