Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BUSE vs BANF

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BUSE
First Busey Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.27B
5Y Perf.+48.5%
BANF
BancFirst Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.76B
5Y Perf.+197.1%

BUSE vs BANF — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BUSE logoBUSE
BANF logoBANF
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$2.27B$3.76B
Revenue (TTM)$1.04B$909M
Net Income (TTM)$135M$238M
Gross Margin63.9%68.5%
Operating Margin17.9%30.3%
Forward P/E10.8x15.5x
Total Debt$490M$86M
Cash & Equiv.$181M$3.55B

BUSE vs BANFLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BUSE
BANF
StockMay 20May 26Return
First Busey Corpora… (BUSE)100148.5+48.5%
BancFirst Corporati… (BANF)100297.1+197.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BUSE vs BANF

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BUSE leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. BancFirst Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BUSE
First Busey Corporation
The Banking Pick

BUSE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.91, yield 3.8%
  • Rev growth 57.6%, EPS growth -25.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.91, Low D/E 19.8%, current ratio 0.07x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
BANF
BancFirst Corporation
The Banking Pick

BANF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.

  • 323.2% 10Y total return vs BUSE's 77.6%
  • NIM 3.3% vs BUSE's 3.1%
  • Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BUSE's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Best for: long-term compounding and bank quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBUSE logoBUSE57.6% NII/revenue growth vs BANF's 12.3%
ValueBUSE logoBUSELower P/E (10.8x vs 15.5x)
Quality / MarginsBANF logoBANFEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs BUSE's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyBUSE logoBUSEBeta 0.91 vs BANF's 0.93
DividendsBUSE logoBUSE3.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BANF's 1.5%
Momentum (1Y)BUSE logoBUSE+27.6% vs BANF's -4.8%
Efficiency (ROA)BANF logoBANFEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs BUSE's 0.5%

BUSE vs BANF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BUSEFirst Busey Corporation
FY 2025
Asset Management
72.5%$69M
Technology Service
20.9%$20M
Other Service Charges On Deposit Accounts
6.6%$6M
BANFBancFirst Corporation
FY 2024
Deposit Account
76.1%$70M
Fiduciary and Trust
23.9%$22M

BUSE vs BANF — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBUSELAGGINGBANF

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BANF leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

BUSE and BANF operate at a comparable scale, with $1.0B and $909M in trailing revenue. BANF is the more profitable business, keeping 23.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BUSE's 13.0%.

MetricBUSE logoBUSEFirst Busey Corpo…BANF logoBANFBancFirst Corpora…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.0B$909M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$220M$324M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$135M$238M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$172M$196M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+63.9%+68.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+17.9%+30.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+13.0%+23.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.6%+24.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+28.6%+5.7%
BANF leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BUSE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 17.6x trailing earnings, BANF trades at a 3% valuation discount to BUSE's 18.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BANF's 1.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BUSE's 12.6x.

MetricBUSE logoBUSEFirst Busey Corpo…BANF logoBANFBancFirst Corpora…
Market CapShares × price$2.3B$3.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.6B$294M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.09x17.58x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.78x15.48x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.81x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.62x0.99x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.18x4.14x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.96x2.35x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.08x16.75x
BUSE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BANF leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

BANF delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $6 for BUSE. BANF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BUSE's 0.20x.

MetricBUSE logoBUSEFirst Busey Corpo…BANF logoBANFBancFirst Corpora…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.7%+13.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.7%+1.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.8%+12.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.3%+15.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–955
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.20x0.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$309M-$3.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$181M$3.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$490M$86M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.58x1.11x
BANF leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BUSE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BANF five years ago would be worth $16,531 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,174 for BUSE. Over the past 12 months, BUSE leads with a +27.6% total return vs BANF's -4.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BUSE at 19.1% vs BANF's 18.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBUSE logoBUSEFirst Busey Corpo…BANF logoBANFBancFirst Corpora…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+13.4%+6.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+27.6%-4.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+69.1%+64.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+21.7%+65.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+77.6%+323.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+19.1%+18.0%
BUSE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

BUSE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

BUSE is the less volatile stock with a 0.91 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BANF's 0.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BUSE currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs BANF's 81.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBUSE logoBUSEFirst Busey Corpo…BANF logoBANFBancFirst Corpora…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.91x0.93x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$27.65$138.77
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$21.41$101.48
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.2%+81.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.455.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded550K135K
BUSE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — BUSE and BANF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates BUSE as "Hold" and BANF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.1% upside for BUSE (target: $29) vs -16.1% for BANF (target: $95). For income investors, BUSE offers the higher dividend yield at 3.84% vs BANF's 1.52%.

MetricBUSE logoBUSEFirst Busey Corpo…BANF logoBANFBancFirst Corpora…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.00$95.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts113
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.8%+1.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises111
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.02$1.72
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.1%0.0%
Evenly matched — BUSE and BANF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

BUSE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). BANF leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallFirst Busey Corporation (BUSE)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BUSE vs BANF: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BUSE or BANF a better buy right now?

For growth investors, First Busey Corporation (BUSE) is the stronger pick with 57.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 3% for BancFirst Corporation (BANF). BancFirst Corporation (BANF) offers the better valuation at 17. 6x trailing P/E (15. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Busey Corporation (BUSE) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BUSE or BANF?

On trailing P/E, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) is the cheapest at 17.

6x versus First Busey Corporation at 18. 1x. On forward P/E, First Busey Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BUSE or BANF?

Over the past 5 years, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) delivered a total return of +65.

3%, compared to +21. 7% for First Busey Corporation (BUSE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BANF returned +323. 2% versus BUSE's +77. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BUSE or BANF?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Busey Corporation (BUSE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

91β versus BancFirst Corporation's 0. 93β — meaning BANF is approximately 2% more volatile than BUSE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 20% for First Busey Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BUSE or BANF?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Busey Corporation (BUSE) is pulling ahead at 57.

6% versus 12. 3% for BancFirst Corporation (BANF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BancFirst Corporation grew EPS 1. 6% year-over-year, compared to -25. 8% for First Busey Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BUSE or BANF?

BancFirst Corporation (BANF) is the more profitable company, earning 23.

8% net margin versus 13. 0% for First Busey Corporation — meaning it keeps 23. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BANF leads at 30. 3% versus 17. 9% for BUSE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BANF leads at 68. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BUSE or BANF more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, First Busey Corporation (BUSE) trades at 10.

8x forward P/E versus 15. 5x for BancFirst Corporation — 4. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BUSE: 9. 1% to $29. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BUSE or BANF?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

First Busey Corporation (BUSE) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 1. 5% for BancFirst Corporation (BANF).

09

Is BUSE or BANF better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

93), 1. 5% yield, +323. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BANF: +323. 2%, BUSE: +77. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BUSE and BANF?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BUSE is a small-cap high-growth stock; BANF is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

BUSE

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 28%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BANF

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BUSE and BANF on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BUSE: 57.6% · BANF: 12.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(BUSE: 13.0% · BANF: 23.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(BUSE: 18.1x · BANF: 17.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.