Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BUSE vs BANF vs BOKF vs FFIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
BUSE vs BANF vs BOKF vs FFIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.27B | $3.76B | $10.28B | $4.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.04B | $909M | $3.36B | $739M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $135M | $238M | $537M | $243M |
| Gross Margin | 63.9% | 68.5% | 57.1% | 70.8% |
| Operating Margin | 17.9% | 30.3% | 19.8% | 36.8% |
| Forward P/E | 10.8x | 15.4x | 12.9x | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $490M | $86M | $4.45B | $197M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $181M | $3.55B | $1.43B | $763M |
BUSE vs BANF vs BOKF vs FFIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Busey Corpora… (BUSE) | 100 | 148.6 | +48.6% |
| BancFirst Corporati… (BANF) | 100 | 296.3 | +196.3% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 260.1 | +160.1% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.3 | +5.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BUSE vs BANF vs BOKF vs FFIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BUSE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.91, yield 3.8%
- Beta 0.91, yield 3.8%, current ratio 0.07x
- 57.6% NII/revenue growth vs BOKF's 10.4%
- Lower P/E (10.8x vs 15.9x)
BANF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 323.2% 10Y total return vs BOKF's 168.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.93, Low D/E 5.3%, current ratio 0.33x
- PEG 1.59 vs BOKF's 4.33
- NIM 3.3% vs BOKF's 2.4%
BOKF is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +44.8% vs BANF's -4.8%
FFIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BUSE's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BUSE's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 57.6% NII/revenue growth vs BOKF's 10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.8x vs 15.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BUSE's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.91 vs BOKF's 1.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.8% vs BANF's -4.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BUSE's 0.5% |
BUSE vs BANF vs BOKF vs FFIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BUSE vs BANF vs BOKF vs FFIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BUSE leads in 2 of 6 categories
FFIN leads 1 • BANF leads 1 • BOKF leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOKF is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 4.5x FFIN's $739M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BUSE's 13.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $909M | $3.4B | $739M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $220M | $324M | $797M | $310M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $135M | $238M | $537M | $243M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $172M | $196M | $1.5B | $290M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.9% | +68.5% | +57.1% | +70.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.9% | +30.3% | +19.8% | +36.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.0% | +23.8% | +15.6% | +30.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +24.7% | +42.6% | +39.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.6% | +5.7% | +1.8% | -7.7% |
Valuation Metrics
BUSE leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.4x trailing earnings, BOKF trades at a 21% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BANF offers better value at 1.81x vs BOKF's 5.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $3.8B | $10.3B | $4.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $294M | $13.3B | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.09x | 17.58x | 16.39x | 20.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.80x | 15.44x | 12.88x | 15.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.81x | 5.51x | 3.98x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.62x | 0.99x | 17.23x | 14.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.18x | 4.14x | 3.06x | 6.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | 2.35x | 1.53x | 2.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.08x | 16.75x | 7.19x | 15.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BANF leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BANF delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $6 for BUSE. BANF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOKF's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BOKF scores 6/9 vs BANF's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.7% | +13.3% | +8.9% | +13.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +1.7% | +1.1% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | +12.8% | +4.1% | +11.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +15.7% | +5.5% | +16.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.20x | 0.05x | 0.80x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $309M | -$3.5B | $3.0B | -$566M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $181M | $3.6B | $1.4B | $763M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $490M | $86M | $4.5B | $197M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.58x | 1.11x | 0.55x | 1.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BOKF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BANF five years ago would be worth $16,531 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,178 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, BOKF leads with a +44.8% total return vs BANF's -4.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BOKF at 21.5% vs FFIN's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.4% | +6.8% | +13.0% | +8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.6% | -4.8% | +44.8% | -3.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.1% | +64.4% | +79.4% | +29.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.7% | +65.3% | +59.4% | -28.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.6% | +323.2% | +168.5% | +145.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.1% | +18.0% | +21.5% | +8.9% |
Risk & Volatility
BUSE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BUSE is the less volatile stock with a 0.91 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BOKF's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BUSE currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs BANF's 81.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.92x | 1.00x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.65 | $138.77 | $139.73 | $38.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.41 | $101.48 | $91.35 | $28.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.2% | +81.6% | +95.5% | +83.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.4 | 55.5 | 58.9 | 58.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 550K | 135K | 317K | 740K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BUSE and BANF and BOKF and FFIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BUSE as "Hold", BANF as "Hold", BOKF as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.2% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs -16.1% for BANF (target: $95). For income investors, BUSE offers the higher dividend yield at 3.84% vs BANF's 1.52%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.00 | $95.00 | $131.57 | $39.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 3 | 21 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.8% | +1.5% | +1.7% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.02 | $1.72 | $2.24 | $0.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.1% | 0.0% | +0.9% | 0.0% |
BUSE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). FFIN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
BUSE vs BANF vs BOKF vs FFIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BUSE or BANF or BOKF or FFIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Busey Corporation (BUSE) is the stronger pick with 57.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF). BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) offers the better valuation at 16. 4x trailing P/E (12. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Busey Corporation (BUSE) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BUSE or BANF or BOKF or FFIN?
On trailing P/E, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is the cheapest at 16.
4x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, First Busey Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: BancFirst Corporation wins at 1. 59x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 33x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BUSE or BANF or BOKF or FFIN?
Over the past 5 years, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) delivered a total return of +65.
3%, compared to -28. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BANF returned +322. 3% versus BUSE's +77. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BUSE or BANF or BOKF or FFIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Busey Corporation (BUSE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
90β versus BOK Financial Corporation's 1. 00β — meaning BOKF is approximately 12% more volatile than BUSE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 80% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BUSE or BANF or BOKF or FFIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Busey Corporation (BUSE) is pulling ahead at 57.
6% versus 10. 4% for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Financial Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 12. 2% year-over-year, compared to -25. 8% for First Busey Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BUSE or BANF or BOKF or FFIN?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus 13. 0% for First Busey Corporation — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus 17. 9% for BUSE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FFIN leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BUSE or BANF or BOKF or FFIN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 59x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 33x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, First Busey Corporation (BUSE) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 5. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 21. 2% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — BUSE or BANF or BOKF or FFIN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First Busey Corporation (BUSE) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 1. 5% for BancFirst Corporation (BANF).
09Is BUSE or BANF or BOKF or FFIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
92), 1. 5% yield, +322. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BANF: +322. 3%, BOKF: +166. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BUSE and BANF and BOKF and FFIN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BUSE is a small-cap high-growth stock; BANF is a small-cap deep-value stock; BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.