Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BV vs LMND

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BV
BrightView Holdings, Inc.

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.21B
5Y Perf.+7.1%
LMND
Lemonade, Inc.

Insurance - Property & Casualty

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.18B
5Y Perf.-6.4%

BV vs LMND — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BV logoBV
LMND logoLMND
IndustrySpecialty Business ServicesInsurance - Property & Casualty
Market Cap$1.21B$4.18B
Revenue (TTM)$2.73B$821M
Net Income (TTM)$38M$-139M
Gross Margin22.0%47.6%
Operating Margin4.5%-16.3%
Forward P/E17.6x
Total Debt$913M$182M
Cash & Equiv.$75M$385M

BV vs LMNDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BV
LMND
StockJul 20May 26Return
BrightView Holdings… (BV)100107.1+7.1%
Lemonade, Inc. (LMND)10093.6-6.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BV vs LMND

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BV leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Lemonade, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BV
BrightView Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

BV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.13, yield 2.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.13, Low D/E 50.7%, current ratio 1.30x
  • Beta 1.13, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.30x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
LMND
Lemonade, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

LMND is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 42.2%
  • -21.6% 10Y total return vs BV's -39.3%
  • 40.2% revenue growth vs BV's -3.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLMND logoLMND40.2% revenue growth vs BV's -3.4%
Quality / MarginsBV logoBV1.4% margin vs LMND's -16.9%
Stability / SafetyBV logoBVBeta 1.13 vs LMND's 2.75
DividendsBV logoBV2.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)LMND logoLMND+78.2% vs BV's -10.7%
Efficiency (ROA)BV logoBV1.1% ROA vs LMND's -7.4%, ROIC 3.9% vs -36.8%

BV vs LMND — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BVBrightView Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Landscape Maintenance
88.9%$1.7B
Snow Removal
11.1%$211M
LMNDLemonade, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$738M

BV vs LMND — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBVLAGGINGLMND

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

LMND leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

BV is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.7B annually — 3.3x LMND's $821M. BV is the more profitable business, keeping 1.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LMND's -16.9%. On growth, LMND holds the edge at +55.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBV logoBVBrightView Holdin…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.7B$821M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$265M-$121M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$38M-$139M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$6M$20M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+22.0%+47.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.5%-16.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.4%-16.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+0.2%+2.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.1%+55.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-189.2%+45.3%
LMND leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BV leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricBV logoBVBrightView Holdin…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$1.2B$4.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.0B$4.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS22.77x-23.67x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.62x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.69x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.45x5.67x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.70x7.33x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF32.17x
BV leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BV leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

BV delivers a 2.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-27 for LMND. LMND carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BV's 0.51x.

MetricBV logoBVBrightView Holdin…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.1%-26.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.1%-7.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.9%-36.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.7%-22.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–944
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.51x0.34x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$839M-$203M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$75M$385M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$913M$182M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.00x
BV leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

LMND leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BV five years ago would be worth $6,930 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,880 for LMND. Over the past 12 months, LMND leads with a +78.2% total return vs BV's -10.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LMND at 49.6% vs BV's 26.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBV logoBVBrightView Holdin…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+3.0%-28.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-10.7%+78.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+101.9%+234.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-30.7%-31.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-39.3%-21.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+26.4%+49.6%
LMND leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

BV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

BV is the less volatile stock with a 1.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LMND's 2.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BV currently trades 75.9% from its 52-week high vs LMND's 54.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBV logoBVBrightView Holdin…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.13x2.75x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.11$99.90
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$11.06$28.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+75.9%+54.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10066.036.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded531K1.9M
BV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates BV as "Buy" and LMND as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.5% upside for LMND (target: $73) vs 4.2% for BV (target: $14). BV is the only dividend payer here at 2.82% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricBV logoBVBrightView Holdin…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$13.53$72.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts1315
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.37
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

BV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). LMND leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns).

Best OverallBrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BV vs LMND: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BV or LMND a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Lemonade, Inc.

(LMND) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV). BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV) offers the better valuation at 22. 8x trailing P/E (17. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — BV or LMND?

Over the past 5 years, BrightView Holdings, Inc.

(BV) delivered a total return of -30. 7%, compared to -31. 2% for Lemonade, Inc. (LMND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LMND returned -21. 6% versus BV's -39. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — BV or LMND?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BrightView Holdings, Inc.

(BV) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 13β versus Lemonade, Inc. 's 2. 75β — meaning LMND is approximately 143% more volatile than BV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lemonade, Inc. (LMND) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 51% for BrightView Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — BV or LMND?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lemonade, Inc.

(LMND) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus -3. 4% for BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BrightView Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 185. 0% year-over-year, compared to 19. 3% for Lemonade, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LMND leads at 42. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — BV or LMND?

BrightView Holdings, Inc.

(BV) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 1% net margin versus -22. 4% for Lemonade, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BV leads at 5. 0% versus -21. 8% for LMND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LMND leads at 40. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is BV or LMND more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LMND: 33.

5% to $72. 67.

07

Which pays a better dividend — BV or LMND?

In this comparison, BV (2.

8% yield) pays a dividend. LMND does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is BV or LMND better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, BrightView Holdings, Inc.

(BV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 13), 2. 8% yield). Lemonade, Inc. (LMND) carries a higher beta of 2. 75 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BV: -39. 3%, LMND: -21. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between BV and LMND?

These companies operate in different sectors (BV (Industrials) and LMND (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LMND is a small-cap high-growth stock. BV pays a dividend while LMND does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

BV

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LMND

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 27%
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BV and LMND on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BV: 6.1% · LMND: 55.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.