Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BV vs SERV vs CART vs SITE vs DASH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Specialty Retail
Industrial - Distribution
Internet Content & Information
BV vs SERV vs CART vs SITE vs DASH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Industrial - Machinery | Specialty Retail | Industrial - Distribution | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $1.21B | $560M | $8.99B | $5.54B | $74.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.73B | $5M | $3.86B | $4.71B | $14.72B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $38M | $-137M | $485M | $153M | $925M |
| Gross Margin | 22.0% | -441.1% | 73.0% | 34.9% | 50.9% |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | -28.8% | 15.9% | 5.1% | 4.9% |
| Forward P/E | 17.6x | — | 15.8x | 28.7x | 67.3x |
| Total Debt | $913M | $5M | $36M | $980M | $3.75B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $75M | $106M | $637M | $191M | $4.38B |
BV vs SERV vs CART vs SITE vs DASH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BrightView Holdings… (BV) | 100 | 109.1 | +9.1% |
| Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV) | 100 | 176.5 | +76.5% |
| Instacart (Maplebea… (CART) | 100 | 101.9 | +1.9% |
| SiteOne Landscape S… (SITE) | 100 | 71.6 | -28.4% |
| DoorDash, Inc. (DASH) | 100 | 124.4 | +24.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BV vs SERV vs CART vs SITE vs DASH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.13, yield 2.8%
- 2.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
SERV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 70.9% 10Y total return vs SITE's 368.6%
- 46.3% revenue growth vs BV's -3.4%
- +51.8% vs CART's -16.9%
CART carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 2.40x
- Beta 0.39, current ratio 2.40x
- Lower P/E (15.8x vs 67.3x)
- 12.6% margin vs SERV's -26.4%
SITE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
DASH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.9%, EPS growth 6.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 46.3% revenue growth vs BV's -3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.8x vs 67.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.6% margin vs SERV's -26.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs SERV's 4.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +51.8% vs CART's -16.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.0% ROA vs SERV's -44.9%, ROIC 24.0% vs -64.9% |
BV vs SERV vs CART vs SITE vs DASH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BV vs SERV vs CART vs SITE vs DASH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CART leads in 2 of 6 categories
BV leads 1 • SERV leads 0 • SITE leads 0 • DASH leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CART leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DASH is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.7B annually — 2833.9x SERV's $5M. CART is the more profitable business, keeping 12.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SERV's -26.4%. On growth, SERV holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.7B | $5M | $3.9B | $4.7B | $14.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $265M | -$142M | $721M | $382M | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $38M | -$137M | $485M | $153M | $925M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6M | -$148M | $883M | $246M | $1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | -4.4% | +73.0% | +34.9% | +50.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | -28.8% | +15.9% | +5.1% | +4.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | -26.4% | +12.6% | +3.2% | +6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.2% | -28.5% | +22.9% | +5.2% | +11.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.1% | +5.8% | +13.6% | +0.1% | +33.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -189.2% | -80.6% | +50.0% | +1.6% | -4.5% |
Valuation Metrics
BV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.8x trailing earnings, BV trades at a 72% valuation discount to DASH's 80.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BV's 6.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DASH's 50.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $560M | $9.0B | $5.5B | $74.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $459M | $8.4B | $6.3B | $74.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.77x | -5.58x | 23.74x | 37.08x | 80.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.62x | — | 15.82x | 28.67x | 67.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 8.94x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.69x | — | 12.43x | 16.70x | 50.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.45x | 211.40x | 2.40x | 1.18x | 5.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.70x | 1.61x | 4.22x | 3.35x | 7.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 32.17x | — | 9.87x | 22.44x | 34.34x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CART leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CART delivers a 16.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-47 for SERV. CART carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SITE's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SITE scores 8/9 vs SERV's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.1% | -47.3% | +16.3% | +9.1% | +9.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | -44.9% | +12.0% | +4.6% | +5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.9% | -64.9% | +24.0% | +7.3% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.7% | -46.3% | +18.9% | +9.6% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 0.01x | 0.01x | 0.58x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $839M | -$101M | -$601M | $789M | -$627M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $75M | $106M | $637M | $191M | $4.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $913M | $5M | $36M | $980M | $3.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.00x | -14706.75x | — | 6.79x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SERV and DASH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SERV five years ago would be worth $17,086 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,157 for SITE. Over the past 12 months, SERV leads with a +51.8% total return vs CART's -16.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DASH at 36.9% vs SITE's -6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.0% | -23.2% | -13.5% | -0.1% | -22.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -10.7% | +51.8% | -16.9% | +5.6% | -3.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +101.9% | +70.9% | +12.7% | -18.7% | +156.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.7% | +70.9% | +12.7% | -38.4% | +37.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.3% | +70.9% | +12.7% | +368.6% | -9.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.4% | +19.6% | +4.1% | -6.7% | +36.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BV and CART each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CART is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SERV's 4.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BV currently trades 75.9% from its 52-week high vs SERV's 48.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.13x | 4.09x | 0.39x | 1.24x | 1.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.11 | $18.64 | $53.50 | $168.56 | $285.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.06 | $5.87 | $32.73 | $112.23 | $143.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.9% | +48.8% | +71.0% | +74.1% | +60.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.0 | 53.6 | 45.9 | 36.8 | 47.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 531K | 3.7M | 3.9M | 689K | 4.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BV as "Buy", SERV as "Buy", CART as "Buy", SITE as "Buy", DASH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 79.6% upside for SERV (target: $16) vs 4.2% for BV (target: $14). BV is the only dividend payer here at 2.82% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.53 | $16.33 | $49.70 | $162.29 | $253.35 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 20 | 26 | 15 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | — | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.37 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | 0.0% | +15.4% | +1.8% | 0.0% |
CART leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BV vs SERV vs CART vs SITE vs DASH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BV or SERV or CART or SITE or DASH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Serve Robotics Inc.
(SERV) is the stronger pick with 46. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV). BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV) offers the better valuation at 22. 8x trailing P/E (17. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BV or SERV or CART or SITE or DASH?
On trailing P/E, BrightView Holdings, Inc.
(BV) is the cheapest at 22. 8x versus DoorDash, Inc. at 80. 4x. On forward P/E, Instacart (Maplebear Inc. ) is actually cheaper at 15. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BV or SERV or CART or SITE or DASH?
Over the past 5 years, Serve Robotics Inc.
(SERV) delivered a total return of +70. 9%, compared to -38. 4% for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SITE returned +368. 6% versus BV's -39. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BV or SERV or CART or SITE or DASH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Instacart (Maplebear Inc.
) (CART) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Serve Robotics Inc. 's 4. 09β — meaning SERV is approximately 959% more volatile than CART relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Instacart (Maplebear Inc. ) (CART) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 58% for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BV or SERV or CART or SITE or DASH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Serve Robotics Inc.
(SERV) is pulling ahead at 46. 3% versus -3. 4% for BrightView Holdings, Inc. (BV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DoorDash, Inc. grew EPS 634. 5% year-over-year, compared to -52. 3% for Serve Robotics Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SERV leads at 190. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BV or SERV or CART or SITE or DASH?
Instacart (Maplebear Inc.
) (CART) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 9% net margin versus -38. 2% for Serve Robotics Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CART leads at 15. 4% versus -42. 5% for SERV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CART leads at 73. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BV or SERV or CART or SITE or DASH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Instacart (Maplebear Inc.
) (CART) trades at 15. 8x forward P/E versus 67. 3x for DoorDash, Inc. — 51. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SERV: 79. 6% to $16. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — BV or SERV or CART or SITE or DASH?
In this comparison, BV (2.
8% yield) pays a dividend. SERV, CART, SITE, DASH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BV or SERV or CART or SITE or DASH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Instacart (Maplebear Inc.
) (CART) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39)). Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV) carries a higher beta of 4. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CART: +12. 7%, SERV: +70. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BV and SERV and CART and SITE and DASH?
These companies operate in different sectors (BV (Industrials) and SERV (Industrials) and CART (Consumer Cyclical) and SITE (Industrials) and DASH (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SERV is a small-cap high-growth stock; CART is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SITE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DASH is a mid-cap high-growth stock. BV pays a dividend while SERV, CART, SITE, DASH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.