Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
BVFL logo
BVFL
CLBK logo
CLBK
NBTB logo
NBTB
KRNY logo
KRNY
ICE logo
ICE
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BVFL vs CLBK vs NBTB vs KRNY vs ICE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BVFL
BV Financial, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$178M
5Y Perf.+27.1%
CLBK
Columbia Financial, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.09B
5Y Perf.+43.5%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.44B
5Y Perf.+51.8%
KRNY
Kearny Financial Corp.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$533M
5Y Perf.+3.5%
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$75.83B
5Y Perf.+46.2%

BVFL vs CLBK vs NBTB vs KRNY vs ICE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BVFL logoBVFL
CLBK logoCLBK
NBTB logoNBTB
KRNY logoKRNY
ICE logoICE
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalFinancial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Market Cap$178M$2.09B$2.44B$533M$75.83B
Revenue (TTM)$52M$507M$902M$344M$12.64B
Net Income (TTM)$13M$52M$169M$32M$3.30B
Gross Margin76.6%50.3%73.6%47.7%61.9%
Operating Margin32.4%11.9%24.3%11.6%38.7%
Forward P/E14.2x27.1x11.2x13.6x16.5x
Total Debt$36M$1.18B$327M$1.26B$20.28B
Cash & Equiv.$6M$341M$185M$167M$837M

BVFL vs CLBK vs NBTB vs KRNY vs ICELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BVFL
CLBK
NBTB
KRNY
ICE
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
BV Financial, Inc. (BVFL)100127.1+27.1%
Columbia Financial,… (CLBK)100143.5+43.5%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100151.8+51.8%
Kearny Financial Co… (KRNY)100103.5+3.5%
Intercontinental Ex… (ICE)100146.2+46.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BVFL vs CLBK vs NBTB vs KRNY vs ICE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ICE leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Kearny Financial Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. CLBK and NBTB also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇ICE emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
BVFL
BV Financial, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BVFL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and bank quality.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.44, Low D/E 19.5%, current ratio 4.18x
  • NIM 4.0% vs KRNY's 1.7%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and bank quality
CLBK
Columbia Financial, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CLBK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 11.9%, EPS growth 5.6%
  • 11.9% NII/revenue growth vs KRNY's 5.1%
Best for: growth exposure
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.

  • Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 3.1%
  • PEG 1.59 vs BVFL's 2.38
  • Lower P/E (11.2x vs 16.5x), PEG 1.59 vs 1.86
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
KRNY
Kearny Financial Corp.
The Banking Pick

KRNY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.

  • Beta 0.67, yield 5.2%, current ratio 1.20x
  • 5.2% yield, vs NBTB's 3.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
  • +47.0% vs ICE's -24.4%
Best for: defensive
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
The Banking Pick

ICE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 192.5% 10Y total return vs BVFL's 214.4%
  • Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
  • Beta 0.38 vs CLBK's 0.82, lower leverage
  • Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCLBK logoCLBK11.9% NII/revenue growth vs KRNY's 5.1%
ValueNBTB logoNBTBLower P/E (11.2x vs 16.5x), PEG 1.59 vs 1.86
Quality / MarginsICE logoICEEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyICE logoICEBeta 0.38 vs CLBK's 0.82, lower leverage
DividendsKRNY logoKRNY5.2% yield, vs NBTB's 3.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)KRNY logoKRNY+47.0% vs ICE's -24.4%
Efficiency (ROA)ICE logoICEEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5%

BVFL vs CLBK vs NBTB vs KRNY vs ICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
BVFLBV Financial, Inc.
FY 2025
Debit Card
60.4%$706,000
Deposit Account
39.6%$462,000
CLBKColumbia Financial, Inc.
FY 2025
Deposit Account, Title Insurance And Other Non-Interest Income
50.0%$18M
Deposit Account
22.3%$8M
Other Non-Interest Income
17.7%$6M
Title Insurance
8.4%$3M
Insurance Agency Income
1.6%$580,000
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
KRNYKearny Financial Corp.
FY 2025
Products And Services, Miscellaneous
48.4%$3M
Deposit Related Fees And Charges
26.8%$2M
Electronic Banking Fees And Charges Interchange Income
24.7%$2M
ICEIntercontinental Exchange, Inc.
FY 2025
Fixed Income And Data Services Segment
51.1%$1.4B
Exchanges Segment
38.8%$1.0B
Mortgage Technology Segment
10.1%$269M

BVFL vs CLBK vs NBTB vs KRNY vs ICE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNBTBLAGGINGKRNY

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BVFL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

ICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 241.0x BVFL's $52M. ICE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KRNY's 9.4%.

MetricBVFL logoBVFLBV Financial, Inc.CLBK logoCLBKColumbia Financia…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.KRNY logoKRNYKearny Financial …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$52M$507M$902M$344M$12.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$18M$69M$241M$43M$6.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$13M$52M$169M$32M$3.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$19M$59M$225M$40M$4.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+76.6%+50.3%+73.6%+47.7%+61.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+32.4%+11.9%+24.3%+11.6%+38.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+25.7%+10.2%+18.8%+9.4%+26.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+35.8%+11.5%+24.9%+11.6%+33.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.1%+147.1%+39.5%+50.0%+23.1%
BVFL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 14.0x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 64% valuation discount to CLBK's 39.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.99x vs ICE's 2.61x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricBVFL logoBVFLBV Financial, Inc.CLBK logoCLBKColumbia Financia…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.KRNY logoKRNYKearny Financial …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
Market CapShares × price$178M$2.1B$2.4B$533M$75.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$208M$2.9B$2.6B$1.6B$95.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS14.22x39.27x14.02x20.17x23.20x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.27.07x11.18x13.55x16.52x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.38x1.99x2.61x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.85x42.53x10.70x45.20x14.76x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.39x4.11x2.81x1.55x6.00x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.95x1.75x1.25x0.71x2.64x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF9.47x35.62x11.13x24.90x17.68x
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ICE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

ICE delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $4 for KRNY. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KRNY's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs KRNY's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBVFL logoBVFLBV Financial, Inc.CLBK logoCLBKColumbia Financia…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.KRNY logoKRNYKearny Financial …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.0%+4.6%+9.5%+4.3%+11.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.5%+0.5%+1.1%+0.4%+2.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.5%+2.0%+7.9%+1.1%+7.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.9%+1.4%+2.4%+1.5%+9.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–987779
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.19x1.02x0.17x1.68x0.70x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$30M$843M$142M$1.1B$19.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$341M$185M$167M$837M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$36M$1.2B$327M$1.3B$20.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.33x0.26x1.05x0.22x6.53x
ICE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NBTB five years ago would be worth $14,690 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,943 for KRNY. Over the past 12 months, KRNY leads with a +47.0% total return vs ICE's -24.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NBTB at 14.5% vs BVFL's -0.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBVFL logoBVFLBV Financial, Inc.CLBK logoCLBKColumbia Financia…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.KRNY logoKRNYKearny Financial …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+11.9%+29.9%+14.0%+18.2%-15.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+42.2%+44.8%+20.5%+47.0%-24.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-0.3%+9.9%+49.9%+32.7%+24.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+13.1%+22.4%+46.9%-10.6%+26.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+214.4%+29.9%+103.1%-7.4%+192.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-0.1%+3.2%+14.5%+9.9%+7.5%
NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BVFL and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLBK's 0.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BVFL currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 70.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBVFL logoBVFLBV Financial, Inc.CLBK logoCLBKColumbia Financia…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.KRNY logoKRNYKearny Financial …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.44x0.82x0.73x0.67x0.38x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$20.75$21.20$48.81$8.89$189.35
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$14.05$13.66$39.20$5.76$132.84
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.0%+94.5%+95.6%+95.3%+70.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10050.447.151.052.729.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded18K330K277K318K3.3M
Evenly matched — BVFL and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — NBTB and KRNY and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CLBK as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", KRNY as "Hold", ICE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.9% upside for ICE (target: $194) vs -15.1% for CLBK (target: $17). For income investors, KRNY offers the higher dividend yield at 5.20% vs ICE's 1.45%.

MetricBVFL logoBVFLBV Financial, Inc.CLBK logoCLBKColumbia Financia…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.KRNY logoKRNYKearny Financial …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$17.00$46.00$9.50$194.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts210536
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.1%+5.2%+1.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises013013
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.43$0.44$1.93
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+16.9%+0.7%+0.4%+0.1%+1.8%
Evenly matched — NBTB and KRNY and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). BVFL leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallNBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BVFL vs CLBK vs NBTB vs KRNY vs ICE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BVFL or CLBK or NBTB or KRNY or ICE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Columbia Financial, Inc.

(CLBK) is the stronger pick with 11. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 1% for Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BVFL or CLBK or NBTB or KRNY or ICE?

On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is the cheapest at 14. 0x versus Columbia Financial, Inc. at 39. 3x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 59x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 1. 86x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BVFL or CLBK or NBTB or KRNY or ICE?

Over the past 5 years, NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) delivered a total return of +46. 9%, compared to -10. 6% for Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BVFL returned +214. 4% versus KRNY's -7. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BVFL or CLBK or NBTB or KRNY or ICE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 38β versus Columbia Financial, Inc. 's 0. 82β — meaning CLBK is approximately 118% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 168% for Kearny Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BVFL or CLBK or NBTB or KRNY or ICE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Columbia Financial, Inc.

(CLBK) is pulling ahead at 11. 9% versus 5. 1% for Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Columbia Financial, Inc. grew EPS 563. 6% year-over-year, compared to 12. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BVFL or CLBK or NBTB or KRNY or ICE?

Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus 7. 6% for Kearny Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 9. 0% for KRNY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BVFL leads at 76. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BVFL or CLBK or NBTB or KRNY or ICE more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 59x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 1. 86x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 27. 1x for Columbia Financial, Inc. — 15. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 44. 9% to $194. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BVFL or CLBK or NBTB or KRNY or ICE?

In this comparison, KRNY (5.

2% yield), NBTB (3. 1% yield), ICE (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. BVFL, CLBK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BVFL or CLBK or NBTB or KRNY or ICE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 38), 1. 4% yield, +192. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +192. 5%, CLBK: +29. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BVFL and CLBK and NBTB and KRNY and ICE?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BVFL is a small-cap deep-value stock; CLBK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; KRNY is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. NBTB, KRNY, ICE pay a dividend while BVFL, CLBK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.