Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
BVFL vs NBTB vs KO vs JPM vs ICE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Diversified
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
BVFL vs NBTB vs KO vs JPM vs ICE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Diversified | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| Market Cap | $178M | $2.44B | $341.71B | $908.57B | $75.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $52M | $902M | $49.28B | $280.33B | $12.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $169M | $13.70B | $57.05B | $3.30B |
| Gross Margin | 76.6% | 73.6% | 61.7% | 60.0% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 32.4% | 24.3% | 29.3% | 25.9% | 38.7% |
| Forward P/E | 14.2x | 11.2x | 24.3x | 14.6x | 16.5x |
| Total Debt | $36M | $327M | $45.49B | $942.38B | $20.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $185M | $10.27B | $343.34B | $837M |
BVFL vs NBTB vs KO vs JPM vs ICE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BV Financial, Inc. (BVFL) | 100 | 127.1 | +27.1% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 151.8 | +51.8% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 177.7 | +77.7% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 345.8 | +245.8% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 146.2 | +46.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BVFL vs NBTB vs KO vs JPM vs ICE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BVFL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and bank quality.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.44, Low D/E 19.5%, current ratio 4.18x
- NIM 4.0% vs JPM's 2.2%
- +42.2% vs ICE's -24.4%
NBTB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 3.1%
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- Beta 0.73, yield 3.1%, current ratio 1.60x
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 27.8% margin vs NBTB's 18.8%
- 13.1% ROA vs NBTB's 1.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.9%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 481.2% 10Y total return vs BVFL's 214.4%
- PEG 0.83 vs BVFL's 2.38
- Lower P/E (14.6x vs 16.5x), PEG 0.83 vs 1.86
ICE is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.38 vs JPM's 0.87, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.6x vs 16.5x), PEG 0.83 vs 1.86 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs NBTB's 18.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs JPM's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.2% vs ICE's -24.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs NBTB's 1.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.9% |
BVFL vs NBTB vs KO vs JPM vs ICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BVFL vs NBTB vs KO vs JPM vs ICE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BVFL leads in 1 of 6 categories
NBTB leads 1 • KO leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • ICE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BVFL leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 5346.2x BVFL's $52M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NBTB's 18.8%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $52M | $902M | $49.3B | $280.3B | $12.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $18M | $241M | $15.5B | $81.4B | $6.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | $169M | $13.7B | $57.0B | $3.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | $225M | $12.6B | $100.9B | $4.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +76.6% | +73.6% | +61.7% | +60.0% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.4% | +24.3% | +29.3% | +25.9% | +38.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +18.8% | +27.8% | +20.4% | +26.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.8% | +24.9% | +25.5% | +36.0% | +33.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +12.1% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +39.5% | +18.2% | +16.0% | +23.1% |
Valuation Metrics
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.0x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 46% valuation discount to KO's 26.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.92x vs ICE's 2.61x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $178M | $2.4B | $341.7B | $908.6B | $75.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $208M | $2.6B | $376.9B | $1.51T | $95.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.22x | 14.02x | 26.12x | 16.22x | 23.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.18x | 24.27x | 14.60x | 16.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.38x | 1.99x | 2.34x | 0.92x | 2.61x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.85x | 10.70x | 25.45x | 18.52x | 14.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.39x | 2.81x | 7.13x | 3.25x | 6.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 1.25x | 9.99x | 2.51x | 2.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.47x | 11.13x | 64.52x | 9.01x | 17.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $7 for BVFL. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.0% | +9.5% | +41.1% | +15.9% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +1.1% | +13.1% | +1.3% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | +7.9% | +15.8% | +4.5% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.9% | +2.4% | +17.3% | +8.9% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.17x | 1.33x | 2.60x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $30M | $142M | $35.2B | $599.0B | $19.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $185M | $10.3B | $343.3B | $837M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $36M | $327M | $45.5B | $942.4B | $20.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.33x | 1.05x | 10.70x | 0.74x | 6.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,313 for BVFL. Over the past 12 months, BVFL leads with a +42.2% total return vs ICE's -24.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs BVFL's -0.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.9% | +14.0% | +16.4% | +0.8% | -15.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +42.2% | +20.5% | +17.7% | +20.9% | -24.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.3% | +49.9% | +39.3% | +138.8% | +24.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.1% | +46.9% | +65.3% | +135.5% | +26.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +214.4% | +103.1% | +115.0% | +481.2% | +192.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.1% | +14.5% | +11.7% | +33.7% | +7.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BVFL and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BVFL currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 70.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.44x | 0.73x | -0.24x | 0.87x | 0.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.75 | $48.81 | $84.04 | $338.09 | $189.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.05 | $39.20 | $65.35 | $269.72 | $132.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.0% | +95.6% | +94.5% | +96.2% | +70.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.4 | 51.0 | 49.2 | 72.1 | 29.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 277K | 13.6M | 7.4M | 3.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NBTB as "Hold", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", ICE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.9% upside for ICE (target: $194) vs -1.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.06% vs ICE's 1.45%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.00 | $86.13 | $339.75 | $194.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 48 | 61 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.1% | +2.6% | +1.8% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 13 | 56 | 15 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.43 | $2.04 | $5.95 | $1.93 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +16.9% | +0.4% | +0.2% | +3.8% | +1.8% |
BVFL leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). NBTB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BVFL vs NBTB vs KO vs JPM vs ICE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BVFL or NBTB or KO or JPM or ICE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BVFL or NBTB or KO or JPM or ICE?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 14. 0x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 83x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BVFL or NBTB or KO or JPM or ICE?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to +13. 1% for BV Financial, Inc. (BVFL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus NBTB's +103. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BVFL or NBTB or KO or JPM or ICE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
24β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 87β — meaning JPM is approximately -468% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BVFL or NBTB or KO or JPM or ICE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BV Financial, Inc. grew EPS 30. 0% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BVFL or NBTB or KO or JPM or ICE?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 19. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 25. 3% for NBTB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BVFL leads at 76. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BVFL or NBTB or KO or JPM or ICE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 83x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 13. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 44. 9% to $194. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BVFL or NBTB or KO or JPM or ICE?
In this comparison, NBTB (3.
1% yield), KO (2. 6% yield), JPM (1. 8% yield), ICE (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. BVFL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BVFL or NBTB or KO or JPM or ICE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
24), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, BVFL: +214. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BVFL and NBTB and KO and JPM and ICE?
These companies operate in different sectors (BVFL (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services) and ICE (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BVFL is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. NBTB, KO, JPM, ICE pay a dividend while BVFL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.