Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
BVFL logo
BVFL
NBTB logo
NBTB
KO logo
KO
JPM logo
JPM
ICE logo
ICE
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BVFL vs NBTB vs KO vs JPM vs ICE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BVFL
BV Financial, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$178M
5Y Perf.+27.1%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.44B
5Y Perf.+51.8%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$341.71B
5Y Perf.+77.7%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$908.57B
5Y Perf.+245.8%
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$75.83B
5Y Perf.+46.2%

BVFL vs NBTB vs KO vs JPM vs ICE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BVFL logoBVFL
NBTB logoNBTB
KO logoKO
JPM logoJPM
ICE logoICE
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBanks - DiversifiedFinancial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Market Cap$178M$2.44B$341.71B$908.57B$75.83B
Revenue (TTM)$52M$902M$49.28B$280.33B$12.64B
Net Income (TTM)$13M$169M$13.70B$57.05B$3.30B
Gross Margin76.6%73.6%61.7%60.0%61.9%
Operating Margin32.4%24.3%29.3%25.9%38.7%
Forward P/E14.2x11.2x24.3x14.6x16.5x
Total Debt$36M$327M$45.49B$942.38B$20.28B
Cash & Equiv.$6M$185M$10.27B$343.34B$837M

BVFL vs NBTB vs KO vs JPM vs ICELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BVFL
NBTB
KO
JPM
ICE
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
BV Financial, Inc. (BVFL)100127.1+27.1%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100151.8+51.8%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100177.7+77.7%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100345.8+245.8%
Intercontinental Ex… (ICE)100146.2+46.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BVFL vs NBTB vs KO vs JPM vs ICE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NBTB and KO are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. BVFL, JPM, and ICE also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BVFL
BV Financial, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BVFL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and bank quality.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.44, Low D/E 19.5%, current ratio 4.18x
  • NIM 4.0% vs JPM's 2.2%
  • +42.2% vs ICE's -24.4%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and bank quality
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

NBTB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 3.1%
  • Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
  • Beta 0.73, yield 3.1%, current ratio 1.60x
  • 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 27.8% margin vs NBTB's 18.8%
  • 13.1% ROA vs NBTB's 1.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.9%
Best for: quality and efficiency
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 481.2% 10Y total return vs BVFL's 214.4%
  • PEG 0.83 vs BVFL's 2.38
  • Lower P/E (14.6x vs 16.5x), PEG 0.83 vs 1.86
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
The Banking Pick

ICE is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.

  • Beta 0.38 vs JPM's 0.87, lower leverage
Best for: stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNBTB logoNBTB10.4% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.6x vs 16.5x), PEG 0.83 vs 1.86
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs NBTB's 18.8%
Stability / SafetyICE logoICEBeta 0.38 vs JPM's 0.87, lower leverage
DividendsNBTB logoNBTB3.1% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)BVFL logoBVFL+42.2% vs ICE's -24.4%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs NBTB's 1.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.9%

BVFL vs NBTB vs KO vs JPM vs ICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
BVFLBV Financial, Inc.
FY 2025
Debit Card
60.4%$706,000
Deposit Account
39.6%$462,000
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
ICEIntercontinental Exchange, Inc.
FY 2025
Fixed Income And Data Services Segment
51.1%$1.4B
Exchanges Segment
38.8%$1.0B
Mortgage Technology Segment
10.1%$269M

BVFL vs NBTB vs KO vs JPM vs ICE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBVFLLAGGINGICE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BVFL leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 5346.2x BVFL's $52M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NBTB's 18.8%.

MetricBVFL logoBVFLBV Financial, Inc.NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$52M$902M$49.3B$280.3B$12.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$18M$241M$15.5B$81.4B$6.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$13M$169M$13.7B$57.0B$3.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$19M$225M$12.6B$100.9B$4.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+76.6%+73.6%+61.7%+60.0%+61.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+32.4%+24.3%+29.3%+25.9%+38.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+25.7%+18.8%+27.8%+20.4%+26.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+35.8%+24.9%+25.5%+36.0%+33.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.1%+39.5%+18.2%+16.0%+23.1%
BVFL leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 14.0x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 46% valuation discount to KO's 26.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.92x vs ICE's 2.61x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricBVFL logoBVFLBV Financial, Inc.NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
Market CapShares × price$178M$2.4B$341.7B$908.6B$75.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$208M$2.6B$376.9B$1.51T$95.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS14.22x14.02x26.12x16.22x23.20x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.18x24.27x14.60x16.52x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.38x1.99x2.34x0.92x2.61x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.85x10.70x25.45x18.52x14.76x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.39x2.81x7.13x3.25x6.00x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.95x1.25x9.99x2.51x2.64x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF9.47x11.13x64.52x9.01x17.68x
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $7 for BVFL. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBVFL logoBVFLBV Financial, Inc.NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.0%+9.5%+41.1%+15.9%+11.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.5%+1.1%+13.1%+1.3%+2.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.5%+7.9%+15.8%+4.5%+7.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.9%+2.4%+17.3%+8.9%+9.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–987759
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.19x0.17x1.33x2.60x0.70x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$30M$142M$35.2B$599.0B$19.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$185M$10.3B$343.3B$837M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$36M$327M$45.5B$942.4B$20.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.33x1.05x10.70x0.74x6.53x
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,313 for BVFL. Over the past 12 months, BVFL leads with a +42.2% total return vs ICE's -24.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs BVFL's -0.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBVFL logoBVFLBV Financial, Inc.NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+11.9%+14.0%+16.4%+0.8%-15.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+42.2%+20.5%+17.7%+20.9%-24.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-0.3%+49.9%+39.3%+138.8%+24.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+13.1%+46.9%+65.3%+135.5%+26.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+214.4%+103.1%+115.0%+481.2%+192.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-0.1%+14.5%+11.7%+33.7%+7.5%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BVFL and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BVFL currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 70.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBVFL logoBVFLBV Financial, Inc.NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.44x0.73x-0.24x0.87x0.37x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$20.75$48.81$84.04$338.09$189.35
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$14.05$39.20$65.35$269.72$132.84
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.0%+95.6%+94.5%+96.2%+70.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10050.451.049.272.129.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded18K277K13.6M7.4M3.3M
Evenly matched — BVFL and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: NBTB as "Hold", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", ICE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.9% upside for ICE (target: $194) vs -1.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.06% vs ICE's 1.45%.

MetricBVFL logoBVFLBV Financial, Inc.NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$46.00$86.13$339.75$194.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts10486136
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.1%+2.6%+1.8%+1.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises013561513
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.43$2.04$5.95$1.93
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+16.9%+0.4%+0.2%+3.8%+1.8%
Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

BVFL leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). NBTB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallBV Financial, Inc. (BVFL)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BVFL vs NBTB vs KO vs JPM vs ICE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BVFL or NBTB or KO or JPM or ICE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BVFL or NBTB or KO or JPM or ICE?

On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is the cheapest at 14. 0x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 83x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BVFL or NBTB or KO or JPM or ICE?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to +13. 1% for BV Financial, Inc. (BVFL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus NBTB's +103. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BVFL or NBTB or KO or JPM or ICE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

24β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 87β — meaning JPM is approximately -468% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BVFL or NBTB or KO or JPM or ICE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BV Financial, Inc. grew EPS 30. 0% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BVFL or NBTB or KO or JPM or ICE?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 19. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 25. 3% for NBTB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BVFL leads at 76. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BVFL or NBTB or KO or JPM or ICE more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 83x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 13. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 44. 9% to $194. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BVFL or NBTB or KO or JPM or ICE?

In this comparison, NBTB (3.

1% yield), KO (2. 6% yield), JPM (1. 8% yield), ICE (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. BVFL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BVFL or NBTB or KO or JPM or ICE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

24), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, BVFL: +214. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BVFL and NBTB and KO and JPM and ICE?

These companies operate in different sectors (BVFL (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services) and ICE (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BVFL is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. NBTB, KO, JPM, ICE pay a dividend while BVFL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.