Insurance - Brokers
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BWIN vs AON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Brokers
BWIN vs AON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Brokers | Insurance - Brokers |
| Market Cap | $1.54B | $66.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.62B | $17.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-45M | $3.94B |
| Gross Margin | 24.2% | 55.9% |
| Operating Margin | -4.1% | 27.0% |
| Forward P/E | 10.3x | 16.2x |
| Total Debt | $1.77B | $16.53B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $124M | $1.20B |
BWIN vs AON — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Baldwin Insuran… (BWIN) | 100 | 61.1 | -38.9% |
| Aon plc (AON) | 100 | 109.4 | +9.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BWIN vs AON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BWIN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, current ratio 1.16x
- Lower P/E (10.3x vs 16.2x)
AON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.10, yield 0.9%
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth 36.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.2%
- 214.4% 10Y total return vs BWIN's -31.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.4% revenue growth vs BWIN's 9.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 16.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.7 vs BWIN's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.10 vs BWIN's 0.52 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 14-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -13.0% vs BWIN's -49.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.6% ROA vs BWIN's -1.0%, ROIC 13.5% vs 3.1% |
BWIN vs AON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BWIN vs AON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AON leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AON is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.5B annually — 10.8x BWIN's $1.6B. AON is the more profitable business, keeping 22.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BWIN's -2.8%. On growth, BWIN holds the edge at +29.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $17.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $91M | $5.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$45M | $3.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | $3.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.2% | +55.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | +27.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | +22.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | +20.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.4% | +6.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -90.0% | +27.1% |
Valuation Metrics
BWIN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, BWIN's 13.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AON's 15.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $66.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $81.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -41.18x | 18.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.28x | 16.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.20x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.44x | 15.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.02x | 3.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.29x | 6.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 20.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AON leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AON delivers a 44.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $-4 for BWIN. BWIN carries lower financial leverage with a 1.63x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AON's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AON scores 7/9 vs BWIN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.8% | +44.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.0% | +7.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.1% | +13.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.1% | +16.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.63x | 1.73x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $15.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $124M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $16.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.36x | 9.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AON leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AON five years ago would be worth $12,506 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,847 for BWIN. Over the past 12 months, AON leads with a -13.0% total return vs BWIN's -49.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AON at -1.6% vs BWIN's -11.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.4% | -10.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -49.7% | -13.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.5% | -4.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.5% | +25.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.5% | +214.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.9% | -1.6% |
Risk & Volatility
AON leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AON is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BWIN's 0.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AON currently trades 80.9% from its 52-week high vs BWIN's 45.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.52x | 0.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.16 | $381.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.88 | $304.59 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.6% | +80.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.9 | 42.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
AON leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BWIN as "Buy" and AON as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.6% upside for BWIN (target: $29) vs 31.2% for AON (target: $404). AON is the only dividend payer here at 0.94% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.75 | $404.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.91 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.5% |
AON leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BWIN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
BWIN vs AON: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BWIN or AON a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Aon plc (AON) is the stronger pick with 9.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 3% for The Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. (BWIN). Aon plc (AON) offers the better valuation at 18. 1x trailing P/E (16. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. (BWIN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BWIN or AON?
On forward P/E, The Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 10. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BWIN or AON?
Over the past 5 years, Aon plc (AON) delivered a total return of +25.
1%, compared to -31. 5% for The Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. (BWIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AON returned +214. 4% versus BWIN's -31. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BWIN or AON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aon plc (AON) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
10β versus The Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. 's 0. 52β — meaning BWIN is approximately 443% more volatile than AON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. (BWIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 163% versus 173% for Aon plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BWIN or AON?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aon plc (AON) is pulling ahead at 9.
4% versus 9. 3% for The Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. (BWIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aon plc grew EPS 36. 3% year-over-year, compared to -28. 2% for The Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BWIN leads at 15. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BWIN or AON?
Aon plc (AON) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
5% net margin versus -2. 2% for The Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AON leads at 25. 3% versus 7. 3% for BWIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AON leads at 47. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BWIN or AON more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Baldwin Insurance Group, Inc.
(BWIN) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 16. 2x for Aon plc — 5. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BWIN: 39. 6% to $28. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — BWIN or AON?
In this comparison, AON (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. BWIN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BWIN or AON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Aon plc (AON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
10), 0. 9% yield, +214. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AON: +214. 4%, BWIN: -31. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BWIN and AON?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
AON pays a dividend while BWIN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.