Consumer Electronics
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BWNB vs EMR vs GE vs HON vs RTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Aerospace & Defense
Conglomerates
Aerospace & Defense
BWNB vs EMR vs GE vs HON vs RTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Consumer Electronics | Industrial - Machinery | Aerospace & Defense | Conglomerates | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $2.38B | $79.14B | $310.47B | $135.04B | $237.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $635M | $18.32B | $48.35B | $36.76B | $90.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-36M | $2.44B | $8.66B | $4.10B | $7.26B |
| Gross Margin | 25.5% | 52.7% | 34.8% | 36.9% | 20.2% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | 19.8% | 18.5% | 14.9% | 10.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 21.7x | 39.3x | 20.2x | 25.4x |
| Total Debt | $369M | $13.76B | $20.49B | $34.58B | $39.51B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $90M | $1.54B | $12.39B | $12.49B | $7.43B |
BWNB vs EMR vs GE vs HON vs RTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Babcock & Wilcox En… (BWNB) | 100 | 100.8 | +0.8% |
| Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) | 100 | 152.0 | +52.0% |
| GE Aerospace (GE) | 100 | 505.4 | +405.4% |
| Honeywell Internati… (HON) | 100 | 102.2 | +2.2% |
| RTX Corporation (RTX) | 100 | 204.6 | +104.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BWNB vs EMR vs GE vs HON vs RTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BWNB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +266.7% vs HON's +1.5%
Among these 5 stocks, EMR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 36.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.3%
- PEG 3.33 vs HON's 11.03
- 18.5% revenue growth vs BWNB's -18.1%
- 17.9% margin vs BWNB's -5.7%
HON is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 2.2%
- Beta 0.74, yield 2.2%, current ratio 1.32x
- Lower P/E (20.2x vs 25.4x)
- 2.2% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs EMR's 1.5%
RTX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 233.5% 10Y total return vs EMR's 207.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 58.8%, current ratio 1.03x
- Beta 0.50 vs EMR's 1.57, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.5% revenue growth vs BWNB's -18.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.2x vs 25.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.9% margin vs BWNB's -5.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs EMR's 1.57, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs EMR's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +266.7% vs HON's +1.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.8% ROA vs BWNB's -5.3%, ROIC 24.7% vs 9.1% |
BWNB vs EMR vs GE vs HON vs RTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BWNB vs EMR vs GE vs HON vs RTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GE leads in 2 of 6 categories
EMR leads 1 • BWNB leads 0 • HON leads 0 • RTX leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RTX is the larger business by revenue, generating $90.4B annually — 142.3x BWNB's $635M. GE is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BWNB's -5.7%. On growth, BWNB holds the edge at +142.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $635M | $18.3B | $48.4B | $36.8B | $90.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $43M | $4.7B | $9.9B | $6.5B | $13.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$36M | $2.4B | $8.7B | $4.1B | $7.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$86M | $3.1B | $7.5B | $4.2B | $8.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +52.7% | +34.8% | +36.9% | +20.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | +19.8% | +18.5% | +14.9% | +10.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | +13.3% | +17.9% | +11.2% | +8.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.5% | +17.0% | +15.4% | +11.4% | +9.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +142.9% | +2.9% | +24.7% | -6.9% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.4% | +28.2% | -1.1% | -41.9% | +32.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HON and RTX each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.0x trailing earnings, HON trades at a 20% valuation discount to GE's 36.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GE offers better value at 3.08x vs HON's 15.77x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.4B | $79.1B | $310.5B | $135.0B | $237.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $91.4B | $318.6B | $157.1B | $269.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -52.08x | 34.97x | 36.42x | 28.96x | 35.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 21.70x | 39.27x | 20.24x | 25.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.74x | 3.08x | 15.77x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 80.53x | 18.09x | 31.89x | 19.75x | 20.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.05x | 4.39x | 6.77x | 3.61x | 2.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 3.94x | 16.78x | 8.87x | 3.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 29.67x | 42.74x | 25.04x | 29.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GE delivers a 45.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $11 for RTX. RTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HON's 2.24x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RTX scores 8/9 vs BWNB's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +12.1% | +45.8% | +23.1% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.3% | +5.8% | +6.8% | +5.3% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.1% | +8.2% | +24.7% | +12.6% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.5% | +10.0% | +9.6% | +12.6% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.68x | 1.08x | 2.24x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $279M | $12.2B | $8.1B | $22.1B | $32.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $90M | $1.5B | $12.4B | $12.5B | $7.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $369M | $13.8B | $20.5B | $34.6B | $39.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.97x | 6.46x | 11.69x | 3.92x | 5.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GE five years ago would be worth $45,251 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,102 for HON. Over the past 12 months, BWNB leads with a +266.7% total return vs HON's +1.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GE at 55.1% vs HON's 4.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.0% | +4.4% | -7.2% | +9.4% | -5.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +266.7% | +27.7% | +39.3% | +1.5% | +39.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.0% | +76.2% | +273.2% | +14.7% | +92.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.2% | +59.1% | +352.5% | +1.0% | +121.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.2% | +207.0% | +117.1% | +132.4% | +233.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.2% | +20.8% | +55.1% | +4.7% | +24.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BWNB and RTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EMR's 1.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BWNB currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs RTX's 82.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.18x | 1.57x | 1.19x | 0.74x | 0.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.40 | $165.15 | $348.48 | $248.18 | $214.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.15 | $109.53 | $210.51 | $186.76 | $126.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.4% | +85.6% | +85.3% | +85.9% | +82.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.3 | 51.4 | 54.5 | 44.2 | 37.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 2.8M | 5.7M | 3.7M | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EMR and HON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EMR as "Buy", GE as "Buy", HON as "Buy", RTX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.0% upside for GE (target: $386) vs 14.2% for EMR (target: $161). For income investors, HON offers the higher dividend yield at 2.17% vs GE's 0.46%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $161.31 | $386.20 | $243.83 | $224.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 41 | 34 | 28 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | +1.5% | +0.5% | +2.2% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 37 | 2 | 15 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.14 | $2.10 | $1.36 | $4.63 | $2.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +1.6% | +2.4% | +2.8% | +0.0% |
GE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). EMR leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
BWNB vs EMR vs GE vs HON vs RTX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BWNB or EMR or GE or HON or RTX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, GE Aerospace (GE) is the stronger pick with 18.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 1% for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I (BWNB). Honeywell International Inc. (HON) offers the better valuation at 29. 0x trailing P/E (20. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BWNB or EMR or GE or HON or RTX?
On trailing P/E, Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the cheapest at 29. 0x versus GE Aerospace at 36. 4x. On forward P/E, Honeywell International Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: GE Aerospace wins at 3. 33x versus Honeywell International Inc. 's 11. 03x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BWNB or EMR or GE or HON or RTX?
Over the past 5 years, GE Aerospace (GE) delivered a total return of +352.
5%, compared to +1. 0% for Honeywell International Inc. (HON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RTX returned +233. 5% versus BWNB's +29. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BWNB or EMR or GE or HON or RTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RTX Corporation (RTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
50β versus Emerson Electric Co. 's 1. 57β — meaning EMR is approximately 214% more volatile than RTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RTX Corporation (RTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 2% for Honeywell International Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BWNB or EMR or GE or HON or RTX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), GE Aerospace (GE) is pulling ahead at 18.
5% versus -18. 1% for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I (BWNB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I grew EPS 41. 5% year-over-year, compared to -15. 5% for Honeywell International Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GE leads at 16. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BWNB or EMR or GE or HON or RTX?
GE Aerospace (GE) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
0% net margin versus -6. 1% for Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EMR leads at 19. 6% versus 3. 9% for BWNB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EMR leads at 52. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BWNB or EMR or GE or HON or RTX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, GE Aerospace (GE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 33x versus Honeywell International Inc. 's 11. 03x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Honeywell International Inc. (HON) trades at 20. 2x forward P/E versus 39. 3x for GE Aerospace — 19. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GE: 30. 0% to $386. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — BWNB or EMR or GE or HON or RTX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Honeywell International Inc. (HON) offers the highest yield at 2. 2%, versus 0. 5% for GE Aerospace (GE).
09Is BWNB or EMR or GE or HON or RTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RTX Corporation (RTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
50), 1. 5% yield, +233. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RTX: +233. 5%, GE: +117. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BWNB and EMR and GE and HON and RTX?
These companies operate in different sectors (BWNB (Technology) and EMR (Industrials) and GE (Industrials) and HON (Industrials) and RTX (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BWNB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EMR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GE is a large-cap high-growth stock; HON is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RTX is a large-cap quality compounder stock. BWNB, EMR, HON, RTX pay a dividend while GE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.