Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BYRN vs OSS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Computer Hardware
BYRN vs OSS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Computer Hardware |
| Market Cap | $126M | $374M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $111M | $20M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $7M |
| Gross Margin | 61.3% | 76.0% |
| Operating Margin | 10.8% | -10.6% |
| Forward P/E | 138.3x | 68.6x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $1M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $31M |
BYRN vs OSS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Byrna Technologies … (BYRN) | 100 | 128.6 | +28.6% |
| One Stop Systems, I… (OSS) | 100 | 888.2 | +788.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BYRN vs OSS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BYRN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.76
- Rev growth 37.7%, EPS growth -27.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.76, Low D/E 6.0%, current ratio 3.73x
OSS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 209.4% 10Y total return vs BYRN's 104.8%
- Lower P/E (68.6x vs 138.3x)
- 33.0% margin vs BYRN's 14.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.7% revenue growth vs OSS's -41.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (68.6x vs 138.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 33.0% margin vs BYRN's 14.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.76 vs OSS's 2.37 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.3% vs BYRN's -73.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.4% ROA vs OSS's 14.1%, ROIC 18.5% vs -12.8% |
BYRN vs OSS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BYRN vs OSS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BYRN and OSS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BYRN is the larger business by revenue, generating $111M annually — 5.6x OSS's $20M. OSS is the more profitable business, keeping 33.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BYRN's 14.4%. On growth, BYRN holds the edge at +35.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $111M | $20M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14M | -$2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | $7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | -$1M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.3% | +76.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | -10.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +33.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.0% | -6.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.1% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +111.6% | +78.8% |
Valuation Metrics
BYRN leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.8x trailing earnings, BYRN trades at a 80% valuation discount to OSS's 68.6x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $126M | $374M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $116M | $344M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.82x | 68.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 138.25x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.29x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.06x | 11.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.03x | 7.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BYRN and OSS each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BYRN delivers a 25.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $18 for OSS. OSS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BYRN's 0.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OSS scores 5/9 vs BYRN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +25.3% | +18.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +20.4% | +14.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.5% | -12.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.1% | -8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | -$30M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $31M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $1M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -127.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OSS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OSS five years ago would be worth $28,817 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,396 for BYRN. Over the past 12 months, OSS leads with a +526.6% total return vs BYRN's -73.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OSS at 83.7% vs BYRN's 3.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -66.9% | +122.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -73.5% | +526.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.4% | +520.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.0% | +188.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.8% | +209.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.3% | +83.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BYRN and OSS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BYRN is the less volatile stock with a 1.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OSS's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OSS currently trades 89.1% from its 52-week high vs BYRN's 16.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.76x | 2.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.30 | $16.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.24 | $2.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +16.1% | +89.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.9 | 78.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 554K | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BYRN as "Buy" and OSS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 65.8% upside for BYRN (target: $9) vs -40.4% for OSS (target: $9).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.17 | $9.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | 0.0% |
BYRN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). OSS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
BYRN vs OSS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BYRN or OSS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Byrna Technologies Inc.
(BYRN) is the stronger pick with 37. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -41. 1% for One Stop Systems, Inc. (OSS). Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) offers the better valuation at 13. 8x trailing P/E (138. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BYRN or OSS?
On trailing P/E, Byrna Technologies Inc.
(BYRN) is the cheapest at 13. 8x versus One Stop Systems, Inc. at 68. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BYRN or OSS?
Over the past 5 years, One Stop Systems, Inc.
(OSS) delivered a total return of +188. 2%, compared to -76. 0% for Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OSS returned +209. 4% versus BYRN's +104. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BYRN or OSS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Byrna Technologies Inc.
(BYRN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 76β versus One Stop Systems, Inc. 's 2. 37β — meaning OSS is approximately 35% more volatile than BYRN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, One Stop Systems, Inc. (OSS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 6% for Byrna Technologies Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BYRN or OSS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Byrna Technologies Inc.
(BYRN) is pulling ahead at 37. 7% versus -41. 1% for One Stop Systems, Inc. (OSS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: One Stop Systems, Inc. grew EPS 133. 8% year-over-year, compared to -27. 3% for Byrna Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BYRN leads at 35. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BYRN or OSS?
One Stop Systems, Inc.
(OSS) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 8% net margin versus 8. 2% for Byrna Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BYRN leads at 10. 0% versus -10. 5% for OSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BYRN leads at 60. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BYRN or OSS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BYRN: 65.
8% to $9. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — BYRN or OSS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BYRN or OSS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Byrna Technologies Inc.
(BYRN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+104. 8% 10Y return). One Stop Systems, Inc. (OSS) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BYRN: +104. 8%, OSS: +209. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BYRN and OSS?
These companies operate in different sectors (BYRN (Industrials) and OSS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BYRN is a small-cap high-growth stock; OSS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.