Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BYRN vs RGR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
BYRN vs RGR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $126M | $623M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $111M | $552M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $-12M |
| Gross Margin | 61.3% | 14.4% |
| Operating Margin | 10.8% | -4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 138.3x | 20.6x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $18M |
BYRN vs RGR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Byrna Technologies … (BYRN) | 100 | 128.6 | +28.6% |
| Sturm, Ruger & Comp… (RGR) | 100 | 62.6 | -37.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BYRN vs RGR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BYRN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 37.7%, EPS growth -27.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.0%
- 104.8% 10Y total return vs RGR's -4.9%
- 37.7% revenue growth vs RGR's 1.9%
RGR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 1.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 3.87x
- Beta 1.00, yield 1.6%, current ratio 3.87x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.7% revenue growth vs RGR's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.6x vs 138.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.4% margin vs RGR's -2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs BYRN's 1.76, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.8% vs BYRN's -73.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.4% ROA vs RGR's -4.7%, ROIC 18.5% vs -3.0% |
BYRN vs RGR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BYRN vs RGR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BYRN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RGR is the larger business by revenue, generating $552M annually — 5.0x BYRN's $111M. BYRN is the more profitable business, keeping 14.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RGR's -2.2%. On growth, BYRN holds the edge at +35.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $111M | $552M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14M | -$5M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | -$12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | $42M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.3% | +14.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | -4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | -2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.0% | +7.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.1% | +4.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +111.6% | -97.8% |
Valuation Metrics
BYRN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, BYRN's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RGR's 53.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $126M | $623M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $116M | $606M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.82x | -144.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 138.25x | 20.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.29x | 53.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.06x | 1.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.03x | 2.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BYRN and RGR each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BYRN delivers a 25.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-4 for RGR. RGR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BYRN's 0.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RGR scores 4/9 vs BYRN's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +25.3% | -4.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +20.4% | -4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.5% | -3.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.1% | -3.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | -$17M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $18M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -353.50x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BYRN and RGR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RGR five years ago would be worth $7,358 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,396 for BYRN. Over the past 12 months, RGR leads with a +19.8% total return vs BYRN's -73.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BYRN at 3.3% vs RGR's -8.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -66.9% | +16.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -73.5% | +19.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.4% | -23.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.0% | -26.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.8% | -4.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.3% | -8.4% |
Risk & Volatility
RGR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RGR is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BYRN's 1.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RGR currently trades 81.0% from its 52-week high vs BYRN's 16.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.76x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.30 | $48.21 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.24 | $28.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +16.1% | +81.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.9 | 42.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 554K | 163K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BYRN as "Buy" and RGR as "Buy". RGR is the only dividend payer here at 1.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.17 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.62 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +4.2% |
BYRN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). RGR leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
BYRN vs RGR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BYRN or RGR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Byrna Technologies Inc.
(BYRN) is the stronger pick with 37. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR). Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) offers the better valuation at 13. 8x trailing P/E (138. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BYRN or RGR?
On forward P/E, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 20. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BYRN or RGR?
Over the past 5 years, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.
(RGR) delivered a total return of -26. 4%, compared to -76. 0% for Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BYRN returned +104. 8% versus RGR's -4. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BYRN or RGR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.
(RGR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus Byrna Technologies Inc. 's 1. 76β — meaning BYRN is approximately 76% more volatile than RGR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 6% for Byrna Technologies Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BYRN or RGR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Byrna Technologies Inc.
(BYRN) is pulling ahead at 37. 7% versus 1. 9% for Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Byrna Technologies Inc. grew EPS -27. 3% year-over-year, compared to -115. 3% for Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BYRN leads at 35. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BYRN or RGR?
Byrna Technologies Inc.
(BYRN) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 2% net margin versus -0. 8% for Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BYRN leads at 10. 0% versus -2. 1% for RGR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BYRN leads at 60. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BYRN or RGR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.
(RGR) trades at 20. 6x forward P/E versus 138. 3x for Byrna Technologies Inc. — 117. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — BYRN or RGR?
In this comparison, RGR (1.
6% yield) pays a dividend. BYRN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BYRN or RGR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.
(RGR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), 1. 6% yield). Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) carries a higher beta of 1. 76 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RGR: -4. 9%, BYRN: +104. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BYRN and RGR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BYRN is a small-cap high-growth stock; RGR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. RGR pays a dividend while BYRN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.