Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CAC vs FUNC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CAC
Camden National Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$825M
5Y Perf.+45.0%
FUNC
First United Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$248M
5Y Perf.+177.5%

CAC vs FUNC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CAC logoCAC
FUNC logoFUNC
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$825M$248M
Revenue (TTM)$367M$112M
Net Income (TTM)$65M$25M
Gross Margin62.8%68.8%
Operating Margin22.2%24.4%
Forward P/E9.0x8.7x
Total Debt$644M$188M
Cash & Equiv.$97M$78M

CAC vs FUNCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CAC
FUNC
StockMay 20May 26Return
Camden National Cor… (CAC)100145.0+45.0%
First United Corpor… (FUNC)100277.5+177.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CAC vs FUNC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CAC leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. First United Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CAC
Camden National Corporation
The Banking Pick

CAC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 26.8%, EPS growth 6.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 92.5%, current ratio 1.77x
  • Beta 0.99, yield 3.5%, current ratio 1.77x
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
FUNC
First United Corporation
The Banking Pick

FUNC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 2.2%
  • 289.2% 10Y total return vs CAC's 122.9%
  • NIM 3.0% vs CAC's 2.9%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCAC logoCAC26.8% NII/revenue growth vs FUNC's 16.9%
ValueFUNC logoFUNCLower P/E (8.7x vs 9.0x)
Quality / MarginsCAC logoCACEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs FUNC's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyFUNC logoFUNCBeta 0.72 vs CAC's 0.99
DividendsCAC logoCAC3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FUNC's 2.2%
Momentum (1Y)CAC logoCAC+28.2% vs FUNC's +27.8%
Efficiency (ROA)CAC logoCACEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs FUNC's 0.4%

CAC vs FUNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CACCamden National Corporation
FY 2025
Products And Services, Debt Card Income
36.6%$15M
Products And Services, Deposit Accounts Service Charges
23.6%$10M
Products And Services, Fiduciary Services Income
18.3%$8M
Products And Services, Brokerage and Insurance Commissions
16.8%$7M
Products And Services, Other Income
4.7%$2M
FUNCFirst United Corporation
FY 2024
Trust Department
51.3%$9M
Debit Card Income
22.9%$4M
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts
12.5%$2M
Brokerage Commissions
8.2%$1M
Other Service Charges
5.0%$887,000

CAC vs FUNC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFUNCLAGGINGCAC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

CAC is the larger business by revenue, generating $367M annually — 3.3x FUNC's $112M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 18.4% (FUNC) to 17.7% (CAC).

MetricCAC logoCACCamden National C…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$367M$112M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$92M$36M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$65M$25M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$17M$16M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+62.8%+68.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+22.2%+24.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+17.7%+18.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.2%+18.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+33.0%+20.2%
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FUNC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 12.1x trailing earnings, FUNC trades at a 4% valuation discount to CAC's 12.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FUNC's 11.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CAC's 15.0x.

MetricCAC logoCACCamden National C…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…
Market CapShares × price$825M$248M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.4B$357M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.66x12.12x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.98x8.68x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.08x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.99x11.52x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.25x2.22x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.18x1.39x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.87x12.18x
FUNC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FUNC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

FUNC delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $10 for CAC. CAC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.92x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CAC scores 8/9 vs FUNC's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCAC logoCACCamden National C…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+9.8%+12.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.9%+1.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.1%+5.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.3%+8.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–986
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.92x1.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$547M$109M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$97M$78M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$644M$188M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.70x1.01x
FUNC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $23,452 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,934 for CAC. Over the past 12 months, CAC leads with a +28.2% total return vs FUNC's +27.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 47.1% vs CAC's 22.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCAC logoCACCamden National C…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+14.9%+4.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+28.2%+27.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+82.1%+218.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+19.3%+134.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+122.9%+289.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+22.1%+47.1%
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CAC and FUNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FUNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAC's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricCAC logoCACCamden National C…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.99x0.72x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$52.94$41.95
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$35.00$28.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.8%+91.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10050.750.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded94K11K
Evenly matched — CAC and FUNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — CAC and FUNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates CAC as "Buy" and FUNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.0% upside for CAC (target: $53) vs -34.5% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, CAC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs FUNC's 2.15%.

MetricCAC logoCACCamden National C…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$53.00$25.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts61
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.5%+2.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises17
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.68$0.82
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.6%
Evenly matched — CAC and FUNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FUNC leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.

Best OverallFirst United Corporation (FUNC)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CAC vs FUNC: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CAC or FUNC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Camden National Corporation (CAC) is the stronger pick with 26.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 16. 9% for First United Corporation (FUNC). First United Corporation (FUNC) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Camden National Corporation (CAC) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CAC or FUNC?

On trailing P/E, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the cheapest at 12.

1x versus Camden National Corporation at 12. 7x. On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CAC or FUNC?

Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +134.

5%, compared to +19. 3% for Camden National Corporation (CAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +289. 2% versus CAC's +122. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CAC or FUNC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First United Corporation (FUNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

72β versus Camden National Corporation's 0. 99β — meaning CAC is approximately 39% more volatile than FUNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Camden National Corporation (CAC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 92% versus 105% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CAC or FUNC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Camden National Corporation (CAC) is pulling ahead at 26.

8% versus 16. 9% for First United Corporation (FUNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First United Corporation grew EPS 40. 0% year-over-year, compared to 6. 1% for Camden National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CAC or FUNC?

First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more profitable company, earning 18.

4% net margin versus 17. 7% for Camden National Corporation — meaning it keeps 18. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUNC leads at 24. 4% versus 22. 2% for CAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUNC leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CAC or FUNC more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 8.

7x forward P/E versus 9. 0x for Camden National Corporation — 0. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CAC: 9. 0% to $53. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CAC or FUNC?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Camden National Corporation (CAC) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 2. 2% for First United Corporation (FUNC).

09

Is CAC or FUNC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

72), 2. 2% yield, +289. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FUNC: +289. 2%, CAC: +122. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CAC and FUNC?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

CAC

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FUNC

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CAC and FUNC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CAC: 26.8% · FUNC: 16.9%)
Net Margin>
%
(CAC: 17.7% · FUNC: 18.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CAC: 12.7x · FUNC: 12.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.