Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CAC vs FUNC vs MNSB vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
CAC vs FUNC vs MNSB vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $825M | $248M | $176M | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $367M | $112M | $136M | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $65M | $25M | $16M | $382M |
| Gross Margin | 62.8% | 68.8% | 54.4% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | 22.2% | 24.4% | 14.0% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 9.0x | 8.7x | 10.4x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $644M | $188M | $70M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $97M | $78M | $25M | $599M |
CAC vs FUNC vs MNSB vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Camden National Cor… (CAC) | 100 | 145.0 | +45.0% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 277.5 | +177.5% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 177.2 | +77.2% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CAC vs FUNC vs MNSB vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CAC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 26.8%, EPS growth 6.1%
- 26.8% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4%
- +28.2% vs FIS's -35.3%
FUNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 2.2%
- 289.2% 10Y total return vs MNSB's 126.9%
- 18.4% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
- 2.2% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs FIS's 3.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
MNSB is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and bank quality.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 32.0%
- NIM 3.1% vs CAC's 2.9%
- Beta 0.66 vs CAC's 0.99, lower leverage
FIS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 0.31 vs FUNC's 0.77
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.5%, current ratio 0.59x
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 8.7x), PEG 0.31 vs 0.77
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.8% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 8.7x), PEG 0.31 vs 0.77 | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.4% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs CAC's 0.99, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs FIS's 3.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.2% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.2% ROA vs MNSB's 0.7%, ROIC 5.9% vs 5.0% |
CAC vs FUNC vs MNSB vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CAC vs FUNC vs MNSB vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FUNC leads in 2 of 6 categories
FIS leads 1 • MNSB leads 1 • CAC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUNC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 97.4x FUNC's $112M. FUNC is the more profitable business, keeping 18.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $367M | $112M | $136M | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $92M | $36M | $23M | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $65M | $25M | $16M | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $17M | $16M | $13M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.8% | +68.8% | +54.4% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.2% | +24.4% | +14.0% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +18.4% | +11.5% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +18.2% | +7.8% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.0% | +20.2% | +120.9% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, FUNC trades at a 81% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FUNC offers better value at 1.08x vs FIS's 2.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $825M | $248M | $176M | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $357M | $221M | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.66x | 12.12x | 13.36x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.98x | 8.68x | 10.45x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.08x | — | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.99x | 11.52x | 11.58x | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.25x | 2.22x | 1.30x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.18x | 1.39x | 0.82x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.87x | 12.18x | 16.57x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FUNC and FIS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CAC scores 8/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.8% | +12.5% | +7.3% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +1.2% | +0.7% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.1% | +5.9% | +5.0% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +8.5% | +0.9% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.92x | 1.05x | 0.32x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $547M | $109M | $45M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $97M | $78M | $25M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $644M | $188M | $70M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.70x | 1.01x | 0.31x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $23,452 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CAC leads with a +28.2% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 47.1% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.9% | +4.4% | +19.4% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +28.2% | +27.8% | +26.4% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.1% | +218.6% | +21.5% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.3% | +134.5% | +20.6% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +122.9% | +289.2% | +126.9% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.1% | +47.1% | +6.7% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
MNSB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNSB is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAC's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNSB currently trades 93.4% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 0.72x | 0.66x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $52.94 | $41.95 | $25.17 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.00 | $28.00 | $17.86 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.8% | +91.0% | +93.4% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.7 | 50.6 | 50.4 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 94K | 11K | 58K | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FUNC and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CAC as "Buy", FUNC as "Buy", MNSB as "Hold", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs -34.5% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs FUNC's 2.15%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $53.00 | $25.00 | — | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 1 | 1 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +2.2% | — | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 7 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.68 | $0.82 | — | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FUNC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). FIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CAC vs FUNC vs MNSB vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CAC or FUNC or MNSB or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Camden National Corporation (CAC) is the stronger pick with 26.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). First United Corporation (FUNC) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Camden National Corporation (CAC) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CAC or FUNC or MNSB or FIS?
On trailing P/E, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus First United Corporation's 0. 77x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CAC or FUNC or MNSB or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +134.
5%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +289. 2% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CAC or FUNC or MNSB or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Camden National Corporation's 0. 99β — meaning CAC is approximately 50% more volatile than MNSB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 105% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CAC or FUNC or MNSB or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Camden National Corporation (CAC) is pulling ahead at 26.
8% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CAC or FUNC or MNSB or FIS?
First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
4% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUNC leads at 24. 4% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUNC leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CAC or FUNC or MNSB or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus First United Corporation's 0. 77x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 10. 4x for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — 2. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — CAC or FUNC or MNSB or FIS?
In this comparison, FIS (3.
5% yield), CAC (3. 5% yield), FUNC (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. MNSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CAC or FUNC or MNSB or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
72), 2. 2% yield, +289. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FUNC: +289. 2%, MNSB: +126. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CAC and FUNC and MNSB and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (CAC (Financial Services) and FUNC (Financial Services) and MNSB (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CAC is a small-cap high-growth stock; FUNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. CAC, FUNC, FIS pay a dividend while MNSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.