Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CAC vs MNSB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CAC
Camden National Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$837M
5Y Perf.+47.0%
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$176M
5Y Perf.+77.1%

CAC vs MNSB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CAC logoCAC
MNSB logoMNSB
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$837M$176M
Revenue (TTM)$367M$136M
Net Income (TTM)$65M$16M
Gross Margin62.8%54.4%
Operating Margin22.2%14.0%
Forward P/E9.2x10.4x
Total Debt$644M$70M
Cash & Equiv.$97M$25M

CAC vs MNSBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CAC
MNSB
StockMay 20May 26Return
Camden National Cor… (CAC)100147.0+47.0%
MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB)100177.1+77.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CAC vs MNSB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CAC leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CAC
Camden National Corporation
The Banking Pick

CAC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 26.8%, EPS growth 6.1%
  • 26.8% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4%
  • Lower P/E (9.2x vs 10.4x)
Best for: growth exposure
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MNSB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.64
  • 126.8% 10Y total return vs CAC's 125.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 32.0%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCAC logoCAC26.8% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4%
ValueCAC logoCACLower P/E (9.2x vs 10.4x)
Quality / MarginsMNSB logoMNSBEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs CAC's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyMNSB logoMNSBBeta 0.64 vs CAC's 0.99, lower leverage
DividendsCAC logoCAC3.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CAC logoCAC+26.7% vs MNSB's +26.6%
Efficiency (ROA)MNSB logoMNSBEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs CAC's 0.4%

CAC vs MNSB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CACCamden National Corporation
FY 2025
Products And Services, Debt Card Income
36.6%$15M
Products And Services, Deposit Accounts Service Charges
23.6%$10M
Products And Services, Fiduciary Services Income
18.3%$8M
Products And Services, Brokerage and Insurance Commissions
16.8%$7M
Products And Services, Other Income
4.7%$2M
MNSBMainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Core Banking Segment
100.0%$134M

CAC vs MNSB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCACLAGGINGMNSB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CAC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

CAC is the larger business by revenue, generating $367M annually — 2.7x MNSB's $136M. CAC is the more profitable business, keeping 17.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNSB's 11.5%.

MetricCAC logoCACCamden National C…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$367M$136M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$92M$23M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$65M$16M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$17M$13M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+62.8%+54.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+22.2%+14.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+17.7%+11.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.2%+7.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+33.0%+120.9%
CAC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — CAC and MNSB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 12.8x trailing earnings, CAC trades at a 4% valuation discount to MNSB's 13.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MNSB's 11.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CAC's 15.1x.

MetricCAC logoCACCamden National C…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
Market CapShares × price$837M$176M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.4B$221M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.84x13.35x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.16x10.44x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple15.12x11.57x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.28x1.30x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.20x0.82x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF14.06x16.56x
Evenly matched — CAC and MNSB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CAC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

CAC delivers a 9.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. MNSB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CAC's 0.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CAC scores 8/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCAC logoCACCamden National C…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+9.8%+7.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.9%+0.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.1%+5.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.3%+0.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–985
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.92x0.32x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$547M$45M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$97M$25M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$644M$70M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.70x0.31x
CAC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CAC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CAC five years ago would be worth $12,278 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,091 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, CAC leads with a +26.7% total return vs MNSB's +26.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAC at 22.6% vs MNSB's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCAC logoCACCamden National C…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+16.5%+19.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+26.7%+26.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+84.5%+21.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+22.8%+20.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+125.3%+126.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+22.6%+6.7%
CAC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

MNSB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

MNSB is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAC's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricCAC logoCACCamden National C…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.99x0.64x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$52.94$25.17
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$35.00$17.86
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+93.1%+93.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.052.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded94K53K
MNSB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MNSB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates CAC as "Buy" and MNSB as "Hold". CAC is the only dividend payer here at 3.40% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCAC logoCACCamden National C…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$53.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts61
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises12
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.68
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
MNSB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CAC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MNSB leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallCamden National Corporation (CAC)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CAC vs MNSB: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CAC or MNSB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Camden National Corporation (CAC) is the stronger pick with 26.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Camden National Corporation (CAC) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (9. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Camden National Corporation (CAC) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CAC or MNSB?

On trailing P/E, Camden National Corporation (CAC) is the cheapest at 12.

8x versus MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. at 13. 4x. On forward P/E, Camden National Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CAC or MNSB?

Over the past 5 years, Camden National Corporation (CAC) delivered a total return of +22.

8%, compared to +20. 9% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNSB returned +126. 8% versus CAC's +125. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CAC or MNSB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

(MNSB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus Camden National Corporation's 0. 99β — meaning CAC is approximately 54% more volatile than MNSB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 92% for Camden National Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CAC or MNSB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Camden National Corporation (CAC) is pulling ahead at 26.

8% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 6. 1% for Camden National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CAC or MNSB?

Camden National Corporation (CAC) is the more profitable company, earning 17.

7% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CAC leads at 22. 2% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CAC leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CAC or MNSB more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Camden National Corporation (CAC) trades at 9.

2x forward P/E versus 10. 4x for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — 1. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CAC or MNSB?

In this comparison, CAC (3.

4% yield) pays a dividend. MNSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CAC or MNSB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Camden National Corporation (CAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

99), 3. 4% yield, +125. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAC: +125. 3%, MNSB: +126. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CAC and MNSB?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CAC is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock. CAC pays a dividend while MNSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

CAC

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MNSB

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CAC and MNSB on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CAC: 26.8% · MNSB: -1.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(CAC: 17.7% · MNSB: 11.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CAC: 12.8x · MNSB: 13.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.