Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CAC vs MNSB vs NBTB vs FUNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
CAC vs MNSB vs NBTB vs FUNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $837M | $176M | $2.38B | $249M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $367M | $136M | $867M | $112M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $65M | $16M | $169M | $25M |
| Gross Margin | 62.8% | 54.4% | 72.1% | 68.8% |
| Operating Margin | 22.2% | 14.0% | 25.3% | 24.4% |
| Forward P/E | 9.2x | 10.4x | 10.9x | 8.7x |
| Total Debt | $644M | $70M | $327M | $188M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $97M | $25M | $185M | $78M |
CAC vs MNSB vs NBTB vs FUNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Camden National Cor… (CAC) | 100 | 147.0 | +47.0% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 177.1 | +77.1% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 145.6 | +45.6% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 278.3 | +178.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CAC vs MNSB vs NBTB vs FUNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CAC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 0.99, yield 3.4%, current ratio 1.77x
- 26.8% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4%
- 3.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +26.7% vs NBTB's +8.6%
MNSB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and bank quality is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 32.0%
- NIM 3.1% vs CAC's 2.9%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.64 vs CAC's 0.99, lower leverage
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.88, yield 3.1%
FUNC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 16.9%, EPS growth 40.0%
- 290.3% 10Y total return vs MNSB's 126.8%
- PEG 0.78 vs NBTB's 1.55
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 9.2x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.8% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 9.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs CAC's 0.99, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.7% vs NBTB's +8.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
CAC vs MNSB vs NBTB vs FUNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CAC vs MNSB vs NBTB vs FUNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FUNC leads in 2 of 6 categories
NBTB leads 1 • CAC leads 0 • MNSB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 7.8x FUNC's $112M. NBTB is the more profitable business, keeping 19.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNSB's 11.5%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $367M | $136M | $867M | $112M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $92M | $23M | $241M | $36M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $65M | $16M | $169M | $25M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $17M | $13M | $225M | $16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.8% | +54.4% | +72.1% | +68.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.2% | +14.0% | +25.3% | +24.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +11.5% | +19.5% | +18.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +7.8% | +25.2% | +18.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.0% | +120.9% | +39.5% | +20.2% |
Valuation Metrics
FUNC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.2x trailing earnings, FUNC trades at a 11% valuation discount to NBTB's 13.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FUNC offers better value at 1.08x vs NBTB's 1.95x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $837M | $176M | $2.4B | $249M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $221M | $2.5B | $358M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.84x | 13.35x | 13.69x | 12.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.16x | 10.44x | 10.94x | 8.70x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.95x | 1.08x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.12x | 11.57x | 10.46x | 11.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.28x | 1.30x | 2.74x | 2.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.20x | 0.82x | 1.22x | 1.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.06x | 16.56x | 10.87x | 12.22x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — NBTB and FUNC each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CAC scores 8/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.8% | +7.3% | +9.5% | +12.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.7% | +1.1% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.1% | +5.0% | +7.9% | +5.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +0.9% | +2.4% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.92x | 0.32x | 0.17x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $547M | $45M | $142M | $109M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $97M | $25M | $185M | $78M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $644M | $70M | $327M | $188M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.70x | 0.31x | 1.05x | 1.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $23,222 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,091 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, CAC leads with a +26.7% total return vs NBTB's +8.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 47.3% vs MNSB's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.5% | +19.3% | +10.5% | +4.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.7% | +26.6% | +8.6% | +24.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.5% | +21.4% | +55.7% | +219.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.8% | +20.9% | +33.5% | +132.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +125.3% | +126.8% | +104.0% | +290.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.6% | +6.7% | +15.9% | +47.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MNSB and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNSB is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAC's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 97.2% from its 52-week high vs FUNC's 91.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 0.64x | 0.88x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $52.94 | $25.17 | $46.92 | $41.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.00 | $17.86 | $39.20 | $28.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.1% | +93.4% | +97.2% | +91.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.0 | 52.1 | 56.2 | 57.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 94K | 53K | 237K | 11K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CAC and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CAC as "Buy", MNSB as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", FUNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.5% upside for CAC (target: $53) vs -34.7% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, CAC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.40% vs FUNC's 2.15%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $53.00 | — | $46.00 | $25.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 1 | 10 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.4% | — | +3.1% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 12 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.68 | — | $1.43 | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +1.6% |
FUNC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). NBTB leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
CAC vs MNSB vs NBTB vs FUNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CAC or MNSB or NBTB or FUNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Camden National Corporation (CAC) is the stronger pick with 26.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). First United Corporation (FUNC) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Camden National Corporation (CAC) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CAC or MNSB or NBTB or FUNC?
On trailing P/E, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the cheapest at 12.
2x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. at 13. 7x. On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First United Corporation wins at 0. 78x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CAC or MNSB or NBTB or FUNC?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +132.
2%, compared to +20. 9% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +290. 3% versus NBTB's +104. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CAC or MNSB or NBTB or FUNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus Camden National Corporation's 0. 99β — meaning CAC is approximately 54% more volatile than MNSB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 105% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CAC or MNSB or NBTB or FUNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Camden National Corporation (CAC) is pulling ahead at 26.
8% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 6. 1% for Camden National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CAC or MNSB or NBTB or FUNC?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CAC or MNSB or NBTB or FUNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 78x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 10. 9x for NBT Bancorp Inc. — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CAC: 7. 5% to $53. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CAC or MNSB or NBTB or FUNC?
In this comparison, CAC (3.
4% yield), NBTB (3. 1% yield), FUNC (2. 1% yield) pay a dividend. MNSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CAC or MNSB or NBTB or FUNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
68), 2. 1% yield, +290. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FUNC: +290. 3%, MNSB: +126. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CAC and MNSB and NBTB and FUNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CAC is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FUNC is a small-cap high-growth stock. CAC, NBTB, FUNC pay a dividend while MNSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.