Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CANG vs LPSN vs NICE vs AUTL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CANG
Cango Inc.

Auto - Dealerships

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • CN
Market Cap$250M
5Y Perf.-77.6%
LPSN
LivePerson, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$32M
5Y Perf.-99.5%
NICE
NICE Ltd.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$5.78B
5Y Perf.-48.6%
AUTL
Autolus Therapeutics plc

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • GB
Market Cap$410M
5Y Perf.-87.2%

CANG vs LPSN vs NICE vs AUTL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CANG logoCANG
LPSN logoLPSN
NICE logoNICE
AUTL logoAUTL
IndustryAuto - DealershipsSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationBiotechnology
Market Cap$250M$32M$5.78B$410M
Revenue (TTM)$3.46B$244M$2.95B$51M
Net Income (TTM)$-178M$-67M$612M$-225M
Gross Margin13.6%62.2%66.4%-309.4%
Operating Margin7.3%-9.6%21.9%-8.6%
Forward P/E5.7x8.7x
Total Debt$170M$392M$164M$53M
Cash & Equiv.$1.29B$95M$379M$227M

CANG vs LPSN vs NICE vs AUTLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CANG
LPSN
NICE
AUTL
StockMay 20May 26Return
Cango Inc. (CANG)10022.4-77.6%
LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN)1000.5-99.5%
NICE Ltd. (NICE)10051.4-48.6%
Autolus Therapeutic… (AUTL)10012.8-87.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CANG vs LPSN vs NICE vs AUTL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NICE leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Autolus Therapeutics plc is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. CANG also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CANG
Cango Inc.
The Value Play

CANG is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
LPSN
LivePerson, Inc.
The Secondary Option

LPSN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
NICE
NICE Ltd.
The Income Pick

NICE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.72
  • 50.7% 10Y total return vs CANG's -44.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 4.2%, current ratio 1.55x
  • 20.8% margin vs AUTL's -439.7%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
AUTL
Autolus Therapeutics plc
The Growth Play

AUTL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and defensive is your priority.

  • Rev growth 496.0%, EPS growth 27.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 88.7%
  • Beta 1.95, current ratio 10.88x
  • 496.0% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
  • +30.5% vs LPSN's -77.1%
Best for: growth exposure and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAUTL logoAUTL496.0% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
ValueCANG logoCANGBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsNICE logoNICE20.8% margin vs AUTL's -439.7%
Stability / SafetyNICE logoNICEBeta 0.72 vs CANG's 2.25
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)AUTL logoAUTL+30.5% vs LPSN's -77.1%
Efficiency (ROA)NICE logoNICE11.8% ROA vs AUTL's -34.0%, ROIC 13.2% vs -204.1%

CANG vs LPSN vs NICE vs AUTL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CANGCango Inc.
FY 2024
After-market Service Facilitation Service Income
62.9%$41M
Loan Facilitation Income And Other Related Income
24.1%$16M
Automobile trading income
9.6%$6M
Service, Other
3.4%$2M
LPSNLivePerson, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosted Services - Business
85.2%$208M
Professional Services
14.8%$36M
NICENICE Ltd.
FY 2025
Cloud
76.0%$2.2B
Service
19.0%$560M
Product
5.0%$147M
AUTLAutolus Therapeutics plc
FY 2024
License
100.0%$10M

CANG vs LPSN vs NICE vs AUTL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCANGLAGGINGAUTL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NICE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CANG is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 67.7x AUTL's $51M. NICE is the more profitable business, keeping 20.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AUTL's -4.4%. On growth, CANG holds the edge at +58.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCANG logoCANGCango Inc.LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.AUTL logoAUTLAutolus Therapeut…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.5B$244M$2.9B$51M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$333M-$562,000$845M-$427M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$178M-$67M$612M-$225M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0-$43M$665M-$278M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+13.6%+62.2%+66.4%-3.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+7.3%-9.6%+21.9%-8.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-5.2%-27.6%+20.8%-4.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-154.0%-17.4%+22.6%-5.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+58.3%-19.0%+9.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.6%+79.4%+56.5%+3.2%
NICE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CANG leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 5.7x trailing earnings, CANG trades at a 43% valuation discount to NICE's 9.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CANG's 3.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NICE's 6.6x.

MetricCANG logoCANGCango Inc.LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.AUTL logoAUTLAutolus Therapeut…
Market CapShares × price$250M$32M$5.8B$410M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$85M$329M$5.6B$235M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS5.66x-0.22x9.89x-1.84x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.74x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.37x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.13x6.59x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.12x0.13x1.96x40.47x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.42x1.56x0.96x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.22x
CANG leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NICE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

NICE delivers a 16.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-85 for AUTL. CANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AUTL's 0.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NICE scores 7/9 vs CANG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCANG logoCANGCango Inc.LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.AUTL logoAUTLAutolus Therapeut…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-4.1%+16.4%-84.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.3%-12.4%+11.8%-34.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.6%-6.6%+13.2%-2.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.5%-5.8%+16.1%-45.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94575
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x0.04x0.12x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1.1B$297M-$216M-$175M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.3B$95M$379M$227M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$170M$392M$164M$53M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.87x0.20x-25.98x
NICE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CANG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CANG five years ago would be worth $8,579 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $35 for LPSN. Over the past 12 months, AUTL leads with a +30.5% total return vs LPSN's -77.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CANG at 0.4% vs LPSN's -65.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCANG logoCANGCango Inc.LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.AUTL logoAUTLAutolus Therapeut…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-62.0%-31.1%-14.6%-14.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-73.7%-77.1%-40.4%+30.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1.2%-95.8%-49.3%-14.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-14.2%-99.7%-59.1%-70.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-44.9%-97.0%+50.7%-93.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+0.4%-65.4%-20.2%-5.1%
CANG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NICE and AUTL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CANG's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AUTL currently trades 59.4% from its 52-week high vs LPSN's 12.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCANG logoCANGCango Inc.LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.AUTL logoAUTLAutolus Therapeut…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.25x2.05x0.72x1.95x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.88$21.60$180.61$2.70
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.33$2.37$94.89$1.15
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+18.6%+12.4%+53.0%+59.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.640.340.964.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.3M148K631K1.6M
Evenly matched — NICE and AUTL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: CANG as "Buy", NICE as "Buy", AUTL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 459.2% upside for CANG (target: $3) vs 57.8% for NICE (target: $151).

MetricCANG logoCANGCango Inc.LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.AUTL logoAUTLAutolus Therapeut…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.00$150.88$8.87
# AnalystsCovering analysts22314
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises50
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+5.3%0.0%+8.5%0.0%
CANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CANG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). NICE leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallCango Inc. (CANG)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CANG vs LPSN vs NICE vs AUTL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CANG or LPSN or NICE or AUTL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Autolus Therapeutics plc (AUTL) is the stronger pick with 496.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). Cango Inc. (CANG) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cango Inc. (CANG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CANG or LPSN or NICE or AUTL?

On trailing P/E, Cango Inc.

(CANG) is the cheapest at 5. 7x versus NICE Ltd. at 9. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CANG or LPSN or NICE or AUTL?

Over the past 5 years, Cango Inc.

(CANG) delivered a total return of -14. 2%, compared to -99. 7% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NICE returned +50. 7% versus LPSN's -97. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CANG or LPSN or NICE or AUTL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NICE Ltd.

(NICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus Cango Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning CANG is approximately 211% more volatile than NICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 12% for Autolus Therapeutics plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CANG or LPSN or NICE or AUTL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Autolus Therapeutics plc (AUTL) is pulling ahead at 496.

0% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to 27. 5% for Autolus Therapeutics plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, AUTL leads at 88. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CANG or LPSN or NICE or AUTL?

Cango Inc.

(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus -21. 8% for Autolus Therapeutics plc — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus -23. 9% for AUTL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NICE leads at 66. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CANG or LPSN or NICE or AUTL more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CANG: 459.

2% to $3. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CANG or LPSN or NICE or AUTL?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is CANG or LPSN or NICE or AUTL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, NICE Ltd.

(NICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 72)). LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NICE: +50. 7%, LPSN: -97. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CANG and LPSN and NICE and AUTL?

These companies operate in different sectors (CANG (Consumer Cyclical) and LPSN (Technology) and NICE (Technology) and AUTL (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock; LPSN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NICE is a small-cap deep-value stock; AUTL is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CANG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 2916%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LPSN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 37%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NICE

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AUTL

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 247%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CANG and LPSN and NICE and AUTL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CANG: 5833.4% · LPSN: -19.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.