Auto - Dealerships
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CANG vs LPSN vs NICE vs AUTL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Biotechnology
CANG vs LPSN vs NICE vs AUTL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Dealerships | Software - Application | Software - Application | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $250M | $32M | $5.78B | $410M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.46B | $244M | $2.95B | $51M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-178M | $-67M | $612M | $-225M |
| Gross Margin | 13.6% | 62.2% | 66.4% | -309.4% |
| Operating Margin | 7.3% | -9.6% | 21.9% | -8.6% |
| Forward P/E | 5.7x | — | 8.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $170M | $392M | $164M | $53M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.29B | $95M | $379M | $227M |
CANG vs LPSN vs NICE vs AUTL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cango Inc. (CANG) | 100 | 22.4 | -77.6% |
| LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| NICE Ltd. (NICE) | 100 | 51.4 | -48.6% |
| Autolus Therapeutic… (AUTL) | 100 | 12.8 | -87.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CANG vs LPSN vs NICE vs AUTL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CANG is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
LPSN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NICE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.72
- 50.7% 10Y total return vs CANG's -44.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 4.2%, current ratio 1.55x
- 20.8% margin vs AUTL's -439.7%
AUTL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and defensive is your priority.
- Rev growth 496.0%, EPS growth 27.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 88.7%
- Beta 1.95, current ratio 10.88x
- 496.0% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
- +30.5% vs LPSN's -77.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 496.0% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.8% margin vs AUTL's -439.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs CANG's 2.25 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +30.5% vs LPSN's -77.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs AUTL's -34.0%, ROIC 13.2% vs -204.1% |
CANG vs LPSN vs NICE vs AUTL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CANG vs LPSN vs NICE vs AUTL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CANG leads in 3 of 6 categories
NICE leads 2 • LPSN leads 0 • AUTL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NICE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CANG is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 67.7x AUTL's $51M. NICE is the more profitable business, keeping 20.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AUTL's -4.4%. On growth, CANG holds the edge at +58.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.5B | $244M | $2.9B | $51M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $333M | -$562,000 | $845M | -$427M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$178M | -$67M | $612M | -$225M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$43M | $665M | -$278M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +62.2% | +66.4% | -3.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.3% | -9.6% | +21.9% | -8.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.2% | -27.6% | +20.8% | -4.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -154.0% | -17.4% | +22.6% | -5.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +58.3% | -19.0% | +9.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.6% | +79.4% | +56.5% | +3.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CANG leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.7x trailing earnings, CANG trades at a 43% valuation discount to NICE's 9.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CANG's 3.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NICE's 6.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $250M | $32M | $5.8B | $410M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $85M | $329M | $5.6B | $235M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.66x | -0.22x | 9.89x | -1.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 8.74x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.37x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.13x | — | 6.59x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.12x | 0.13x | 1.96x | 40.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.42x | — | 1.56x | 0.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 8.22x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NICE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NICE delivers a 16.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-85 for AUTL. CANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AUTL's 0.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NICE scores 7/9 vs CANG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.1% | — | +16.4% | -84.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.3% | -12.4% | +11.8% | -34.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.6% | -6.6% | +13.2% | -2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.5% | -5.8% | +16.1% | -45.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | — | 0.04x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.1B | $297M | -$216M | -$175M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.3B | $95M | $379M | $227M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $170M | $392M | $164M | $53M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.87x | 0.20x | — | -25.98x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CANG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CANG five years ago would be worth $8,579 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $35 for LPSN. Over the past 12 months, AUTL leads with a +30.5% total return vs LPSN's -77.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CANG at 0.4% vs LPSN's -65.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -62.0% | -31.1% | -14.6% | -14.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -73.7% | -77.1% | -40.4% | +30.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.2% | -95.8% | -49.3% | -14.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.2% | -99.7% | -59.1% | -70.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.9% | -97.0% | +50.7% | -93.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.4% | -65.4% | -20.2% | -5.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NICE and AUTL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CANG's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AUTL currently trades 59.4% from its 52-week high vs LPSN's 12.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.25x | 2.05x | 0.72x | 1.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.88 | $21.60 | $180.61 | $2.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.33 | $2.37 | $94.89 | $1.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.6% | +12.4% | +53.0% | +59.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.6 | 40.3 | 40.9 | 64.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 148K | 631K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
CANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CANG as "Buy", NICE as "Buy", AUTL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 459.2% upside for CANG (target: $3) vs 57.8% for NICE (target: $151).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.00 | — | $150.88 | $8.87 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | — | 23 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.3% | 0.0% | +8.5% | 0.0% |
CANG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). NICE leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
CANG vs LPSN vs NICE vs AUTL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CANG or LPSN or NICE or AUTL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Autolus Therapeutics plc (AUTL) is the stronger pick with 496.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). Cango Inc. (CANG) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cango Inc. (CANG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CANG or LPSN or NICE or AUTL?
On trailing P/E, Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the cheapest at 5. 7x versus NICE Ltd. at 9. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CANG or LPSN or NICE or AUTL?
Over the past 5 years, Cango Inc.
(CANG) delivered a total return of -14. 2%, compared to -99. 7% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NICE returned +50. 7% versus LPSN's -97. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CANG or LPSN or NICE or AUTL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NICE Ltd.
(NICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus Cango Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning CANG is approximately 211% more volatile than NICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 12% for Autolus Therapeutics plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CANG or LPSN or NICE or AUTL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Autolus Therapeutics plc (AUTL) is pulling ahead at 496.
0% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to 27. 5% for Autolus Therapeutics plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, AUTL leads at 88. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CANG or LPSN or NICE or AUTL?
Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus -21. 8% for Autolus Therapeutics plc — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus -23. 9% for AUTL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NICE leads at 66. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CANG or LPSN or NICE or AUTL more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CANG: 459.
2% to $3. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CANG or LPSN or NICE or AUTL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CANG or LPSN or NICE or AUTL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NICE Ltd.
(NICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 72)). LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NICE: +50. 7%, LPSN: -97. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CANG and LPSN and NICE and AUTL?
These companies operate in different sectors (CANG (Consumer Cyclical) and LPSN (Technology) and NICE (Technology) and AUTL (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock; LPSN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NICE is a small-cap deep-value stock; AUTL is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.