Auto - Dealerships
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CARG vs TRU vs OPEN vs EFX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Consulting Services
Real Estate - Services
Consulting Services
CARG vs TRU vs OPEN vs EFX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Dealerships | Consulting Services | Real Estate - Services | Consulting Services |
| Market Cap | $3.77B | $14.07B | $4.08B | $21.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $957M | $4.73B | $3.94B | $6.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $149M | $705M | $-1.39B | $699M |
| Gross Margin | 89.9% | 52.7% | 7.9% | 44.7% |
| Operating Margin | 19.7% | 18.1% | -9.9% | 18.3% |
| Forward P/E | 15.1x | 15.3x | — | 20.4x |
| Total Debt | $191M | $5.16B | $193M | $5.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $191M | $854M | $962M | $181M |
CARG vs TRU vs OPEN vs EFX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CarGurus, Inc. (CARG) | 100 | 150.5 | +50.5% |
| TransUnion (TRU) | 100 | 83.8 | -16.2% |
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 45.3 | -54.7% |
| Equifax Inc. (EFX) | 100 | 102.2 | +2.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CARG vs TRU vs OPEN vs EFX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CARG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 51.0%, current ratio 2.81x
- PEG 0.85 vs EFX's 4.39
- Lower P/E (15.1x vs 20.4x), PEG 0.85 vs 4.39
- 15.6% margin vs OPEN's -35.2%
TRU is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth 60.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.2%
- 142.0% 10Y total return vs EFX's 58.3%
- 9.4% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2%
OPEN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +5.1% vs EFX's -33.2%
EFX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 1.1%
- Beta 0.87, yield 1.1%, current ratio 0.60x
- Beta 0.87 vs OPEN's 3.09
- 1.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs TRU's 0.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.4% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.1x vs 20.4x), PEG 0.85 vs 4.39 | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.6% margin vs OPEN's -35.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs OPEN's 3.09 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs TRU's 0.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.1% vs EFX's -33.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.2% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 36.2% vs -15.8% |
CARG vs TRU vs OPEN vs EFX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CARG vs TRU vs OPEN vs EFX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CARG leads in 2 of 6 categories
OPEN leads 2 • EFX leads 1 • TRU leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CARG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EFX is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.3B annually — 6.6x CARG's $957M. CARG is the more profitable business, keeping 15.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPEN's -35.2%. On growth, EFX holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $957M | $4.7B | $3.9B | $6.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $218M | $1.4B | -$363M | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $149M | $705M | -$1.4B | $699M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $281M | $697M | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +89.9% | +52.7% | +7.9% | +44.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +18.1% | -9.9% | +18.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +14.9% | -35.2% | +11.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.3% | +14.7% | +27.2% | +18.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.2% | +13.7% | -37.6% | +14.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.1% | +172.0% | -50.0% | +34.0% |
Valuation Metrics
OPEN leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.6x trailing earnings, CARG trades at a 25% valuation discount to EFX's 33.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CARG offers better value at 1.37x vs EFX's 7.11x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.8B | $14.1B | $4.1B | $21.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.8B | $18.4B | $3.3B | $26.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.62x | 31.44x | -3.13x | 33.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.14x | 15.28x | — | 20.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.37x | 5.91x | — | 7.11x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.64x | 12.83x | — | 14.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.02x | 3.08x | 0.93x | 3.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.87x | 3.16x | 4.06x | 4.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.06x | 21.27x | 3.93x | 18.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CARG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CARG delivers a 41.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $-163 for OPEN. OPEN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRU's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRU scores 8/9 vs OPEN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +41.9% | +15.1% | -163.2% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +23.2% | +6.2% | -53.6% | +5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +36.2% | +7.3% | -15.8% | +8.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +30.1% | +8.6% | -11.7% | +11.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 1.13x | 0.19x | 1.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $315,000 | $4.3B | -$769M | $4.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $191M | $854M | $962M | $181M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $191M | $5.2B | $193M | $5.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.61x | -8.92x | 5.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OPEN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CARG five years ago would be worth $13,952 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,845 for OPEN. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +510.1% total return vs EFX's -33.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OPEN at 37.4% vs EFX's -3.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.4% | -12.3% | -12.4% | -17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.6% | -13.9% | +510.1% | -33.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +134.8% | +13.9% | +159.5% | -9.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.5% | -29.3% | -71.6% | -23.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.4% | +142.0% | -50.8% | +58.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.9% | +4.4% | +37.4% | -3.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CARG and EFX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EFX is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CARG currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs OPEN's 48.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.89x | 1.36x | 3.09x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.42 | $99.39 | $10.87 | $281.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.39 | $65.23 | $0.51 | $166.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.8% | +73.4% | +48.9% | +62.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.4 | 47.2 | 56.2 | 42.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 2.3M | 36.3M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
EFX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CARG as "Buy", TRU as "Buy", OPEN as "Hold", EFX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.1% upside for TRU (target: $95) vs -1.9% for CARG (target: $37). For income investors, EFX offers the higher dividend yield at 1.07% vs TRU's 0.63%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.42 | $94.88 | $6.50 | $227.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 26 | 26 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.6% | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.46 | — | $1.88 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.3% | +2.4% | 0.0% | +4.4% |
CARG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OPEN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
CARG vs TRU vs OPEN vs EFX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CARG or TRU or OPEN or EFX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TransUnion (TRU) is the stronger pick with 9.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). CarGurus, Inc. (CARG) offers the better valuation at 24. 6x trailing P/E (15. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CarGurus, Inc. (CARG) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CARG or TRU or OPEN or EFX?
On trailing P/E, CarGurus, Inc.
(CARG) is the cheapest at 24. 6x versus Equifax Inc. at 33. 0x. On forward P/E, CarGurus, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: CarGurus, Inc. wins at 0. 85x versus Equifax Inc. 's 4. 39x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CARG or TRU or OPEN or EFX?
Over the past 5 years, CarGurus, Inc.
(CARG) delivered a total return of +39. 5%, compared to -71. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRU returned +142. 0% versus OPEN's -50. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CARG or TRU or OPEN or EFX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Equifax Inc.
(EFX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning OPEN is approximately 255% more volatile than EFX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 113% for TransUnion — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CARG or TRU or OPEN or EFX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TransUnion (TRU) is pulling ahead at 9.
4% versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CarGurus, Inc. grew EPS 675. 0% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRU leads at 7. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CARG or TRU or OPEN or EFX?
CarGurus, Inc.
(CARG) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 6% net margin versus -29. 7% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CARG leads at 20. 7% versus -6. 2% for OPEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CARG leads at 89. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CARG or TRU or OPEN or EFX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, CarGurus, Inc. (CARG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 85x versus Equifax Inc. 's 4. 39x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, CarGurus, Inc. (CARG) trades at 15. 1x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for Equifax Inc. — 5. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRU: 30. 1% to $94. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — CARG or TRU or OPEN or EFX?
In this comparison, EFX (1.
1% yield), TRU (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. CARG, OPEN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CARG or TRU or OPEN or EFX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Equifax Inc.
(EFX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 1. 1% yield). Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EFX: +58. 3%, OPEN: -50. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CARG and TRU and OPEN and EFX?
These companies operate in different sectors (CARG (Consumer Cyclical) and TRU (Industrials) and OPEN (Real Estate) and EFX (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
TRU, EFX pay a dividend while CARG, OPEN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.