Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CATO vs PLCE vs DXLG vs BURL vs ANF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
CATO vs PLCE vs DXLG vs BURL vs ANF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $52M | $74M | $36M | $20.04B | $3.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $660M | $1.29B | $442M | $11.56B | $5.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $-52M | $-8M | $610M | $507M |
| Gross Margin | 32.2% | 28.6% | 44.4% | 41.9% | 58.6% |
| Operating Margin | -2.4% | -0.5% | -2.3% | 8.9% | 13.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 32.4x | 8.1x |
| Total Debt | $146M | $586M | $0.00 | $3.99B | $1.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $5M | $24M | $1.23B | $760M |
CATO vs PLCE vs DXLG vs BURL vs ANF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Cato Corporation (CATO) | 100 | 29.7 | -70.3% |
| The Children's Plac… (PLCE) | 100 | 8.0 | -92.0% |
| Destination XL Grou… (DXLG) | 100 | 155.1 | +55.1% |
| Burlington Stores, … (BURL) | 100 | 151.1 | +51.1% |
| Abercrombie & Fitch… (ANF) | 100 | 683.0 | +583.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CATO vs PLCE vs DXLG vs BURL vs ANF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CATO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.88, yield 19.0%
- Beta 0.88 vs DXLG's 2.30
- 19.0% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
PLCE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, DXLG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BURL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.9%, EPS growth 21.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.0%
- 480.9% 10Y total return vs ANF's 229.6%
- 8.9% revenue growth vs PLCE's -13.5%
- +33.6% vs PLCE's -42.3%
ANF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.42, Low D/E 82.2%, current ratio 1.49x
- Beta 1.42, current ratio 1.49x
- Lower P/E (8.1x vs 32.4x)
- 9.6% margin vs PLCE's -4.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.9% revenue growth vs PLCE's -13.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 32.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.6% margin vs PLCE's -4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.88 vs DXLG's 2.30 | |
| Dividends | 19.0% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.6% vs PLCE's -42.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.1% ROA vs PLCE's -6.7%, ROIC 31.4% vs 2.6% |
CATO vs PLCE vs DXLG vs BURL vs ANF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CATO vs PLCE vs DXLG vs BURL vs ANF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ANF leads in 3 of 6 categories
PLCE leads 1 • CATO leads 0 • DXLG leads 0 • BURL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ANF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BURL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 26.2x DXLG's $442M. ANF is the more profitable business, keeping 9.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLCE's -4.0%. On growth, BURL holds the edge at +11.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $660M | $1.3B | $442M | $11.6B | $5.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $26M | $5M | $1.5B | $862M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | -$52M | -$8M | $610M | $507M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $40M | -$11M | $232M | $378M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.2% | +28.6% | +44.4% | +41.9% | +58.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | -0.5% | -2.3% | +8.9% | +13.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | -4.0% | -1.7% | +5.3% | +9.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.1% | +3.1% | -2.6% | +2.0% | +7.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.3% | -13.0% | -5.2% | +11.5% | +5.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +64.6% | -112.1% | -137.7% | +20.4% | +3.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ANF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.6x trailing earnings, ANF trades at a 77% valuation discount to BURL's 33.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ANF's 4.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BURL's 18.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $52M | $74M | $36M | $20.0B | $3.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $177M | $655M | $12M | $22.8B | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.97x | -0.74x | -1.00x | 33.30x | 7.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 32.38x | 8.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.60x | — | 18.00x | 4.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.08x | 0.05x | 0.08x | 1.73x | 0.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.34x | — | 0.33x | 5.21x | 2.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 19.49x | 116.81x | 9.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ANF leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ANF delivers a 38.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-6 for CATO. ANF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.82x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BURL's 1.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BURL scores 7/9 vs CATO's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.8% | — | -5.5% | +29.7% | +38.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.2% | -6.7% | -1.9% | +6.5% | +15.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.7% | +2.6% | -6.8% | +10.3% | +31.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.6% | +8.2% | -6.4% | +12.0% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.90x | — | — | 1.03x | 0.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $126M | $581M | -$24M | $2.8B | $409M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $5M | $24M | $1.2B | $760M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $146M | $586M | $0 | $4.0B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.77x | -0.28x | — | 11.36x | 302.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BURL and ANF each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ANF five years ago would be worth $19,540 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $420 for PLCE. Over the past 12 months, BURL leads with a +33.6% total return vs PLCE's -42.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ANF at 50.5% vs PLCE's -50.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.0% | -19.4% | -26.3% | +6.1% | -35.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +25.8% | -42.3% | -31.7% | +33.6% | +14.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.8% | -87.5% | -85.1% | +73.6% | +240.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.9% | -95.8% | -56.1% | -2.4% | +95.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.7% | -86.4% | -87.5% | +480.9% | +229.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -22.2% | -50.1% | -47.0% | +20.2% | +50.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CATO and BURL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CATO is the less volatile stock with a 0.88 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DXLG's 2.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BURL currently trades 90.0% from its 52-week high vs PLCE's 34.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.88x | 2.28x | 2.30x | 1.30x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.92 | $9.56 | $1.69 | $351.85 | $133.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.21 | $2.76 | $0.43 | $218.52 | $65.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.5% | +34.8% | +39.2% | +90.0% | +59.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.7 | 39.3 | 59.5 | 41.0 | 30.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 60K | 359K | 145K | 715K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
PLCE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BURL as "Buy", ANF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 52.2% upside for ANF (target: $121) vs 4.8% for BURL (target: $332). CATO is the only dividend payer here at 18.97% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $331.88 | $120.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 35 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +19.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.55 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.5% | +0.9% | +37.9% | +1.4% | +12.4% |
ANF leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PLCE leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
CATO vs PLCE vs DXLG vs BURL vs ANF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CATO or PLCE or DXLG or BURL or ANF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Burlington Stores, Inc.
(BURL) is the stronger pick with 8. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 5% for The Children's Place, Inc. (PLCE). Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) offers the better valuation at 7. 6x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Burlington Stores, Inc. (BURL) a "Buy" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CATO or PLCE or DXLG or BURL or ANF?
On trailing P/E, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) is the cheapest at 7. 6x versus Burlington Stores, Inc. at 33. 3x. On forward P/E, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CATO or PLCE or DXLG or BURL or ANF?
Over the past 5 years, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) delivered a total return of +95. 4%, compared to -95. 8% for The Children's Place, Inc. (PLCE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BURL returned +480. 9% versus DXLG's -87. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CATO or PLCE or DXLG or BURL or ANF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Cato Corporation (CATO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
88β versus Destination XL Group, Inc. 's 2. 30β — meaning DXLG is approximately 160% more volatile than CATO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 82% versus 103% for Burlington Stores, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CATO or PLCE or DXLG or BURL or ANF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Burlington Stores, Inc.
(BURL) is pulling ahead at 8. 9% versus -13. 5% for The Children's Place, Inc. (PLCE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Children's Place, Inc. grew EPS 63. 3% year-over-year, compared to -1420. 0% for Destination XL Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ANF leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CATO or PLCE or DXLG or BURL or ANF?
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 6% net margin versus -8. 3% for Destination XL Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ANF leads at 13. 3% versus -4. 2% for DXLG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ANF leads at 58. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CATO or PLCE or DXLG or BURL or ANF more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 32. 4x for Burlington Stores, Inc. — 24. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ANF: 52. 2% to $120. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — CATO or PLCE or DXLG or BURL or ANF?
In this comparison, CATO (19.
0% yield) pays a dividend. PLCE, DXLG, BURL, ANF do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CATO or PLCE or DXLG or BURL or ANF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Cato Corporation (CATO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
88), 19. 0% yield). Destination XL Group, Inc. (DXLG) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CATO: -71. 7%, DXLG: -87. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CATO and PLCE and DXLG and BURL and ANF?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CATO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PLCE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DXLG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BURL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ANF is a small-cap deep-value stock. CATO pays a dividend while PLCE, DXLG, BURL, ANF do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.