Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CATO vs PLCE vs DXLG vs CURV vs CTRN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
CATO vs PLCE vs DXLG vs CURV vs CTRN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $53M | $67M | $37M | $163M | $400M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $660M | $1.29B | $442M | $1.00B | $801M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $-52M | $-8M | $-7M | $-16M |
| Gross Margin | 32.2% | 28.6% | 44.4% | 34.8% | 37.8% |
| Operating Margin | -2.4% | -0.5% | -2.3% | 2.1% | -1.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 43.8x |
| Total Debt | $146M | $586M | $0.00 | $149M | $220M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $5M | $24M | $20M | $61M |
CATO vs PLCE vs DXLG vs CURV vs CTRN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Cato Corporation (CATO) | 100 | 17.9 | -82.1% |
| The Children's Plac… (PLCE) | 100 | 3.6 | -96.4% |
| Destination XL Grou… (DXLG) | 100 | 13.6 | -86.4% |
| Torrid Holdings Inc. (CURV) | 100 | 6.6 | -93.4% |
| Citi Trends, Inc. (CTRN) | 100 | 58.7 | -41.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CATO vs PLCE vs DXLG vs CURV vs CTRN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CATO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth -8.2%, EPS growth 17.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.88, Low D/E 89.9%, current ratio 1.19x
- Beta 0.88, yield 18.5%, current ratio 1.19x
- 18.5% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
PLCE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, DXLG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CURV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.46
- -0.7% margin vs PLCE's -4.0%
- Beta 0.46 vs DXLG's 2.30
- -1.7% ROA vs PLCE's -6.7%, ROIC 22.5% vs 2.6%
CTRN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 183.0% 10Y total return vs CATO's -71.0%
- 0.7% revenue growth vs PLCE's -13.5%
- +105.4% vs CURV's -72.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.7% revenue growth vs PLCE's -13.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.7% margin vs PLCE's -4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs DXLG's 2.30 | |
| Dividends | 18.5% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +105.4% vs CURV's -72.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.7% ROA vs PLCE's -6.7%, ROIC 22.5% vs 2.6% |
CATO vs PLCE vs DXLG vs CURV vs CTRN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CATO vs PLCE vs DXLG vs CURV vs CTRN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CURV leads in 2 of 6 categories
PLCE leads 2 • CTRN leads 1 • CATO leads 0 • DXLG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CURV leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLCE is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 2.9x DXLG's $442M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -0.7% (CURV) to -4.0% (PLCE). On growth, CTRN holds the edge at +10.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $660M | $1.3B | $442M | $1.0B | $801M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $26M | $5M | $75M | $5M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | -$52M | -$8M | -$7M | -$16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $40M | -$11M | -$22M | $12M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.2% | +28.6% | +44.4% | +34.8% | +37.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | -0.5% | -2.3% | +2.1% | -1.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | -4.0% | -1.7% | -0.7% | -2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.1% | +3.1% | -2.6% | -2.2% | +1.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.3% | -13.0% | -5.2% | -14.3% | +10.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +64.6% | -112.1% | -137.7% | -185.7% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PLCE leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PLCE's 11.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CURV's 13.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $53M | $67M | $37M | $163M | $400M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $179M | $648M | $13M | $292M | $560M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.04x | -0.66x | -1.02x | -22.14x | -9.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 43.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.47x | — | 13.63x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.08x | 0.05x | 0.08x | 0.16x | 0.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.35x | — | 0.34x | — | 3.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 19.72x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CURV leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DXLG delivers a -5.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-5 in annual profit, vs $-15 for CTRN. CATO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.90x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CTRN's 1.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLCE scores 3/9 vs CTRN's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.8% | — | -5.5% | — | -14.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.2% | -6.7% | -1.9% | -1.7% | -3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.7% | +2.6% | -6.8% | +22.5% | -10.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.6% | +8.2% | -6.4% | +11.4% | -12.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.90x | — | — | — | 1.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $126M | $581M | -$24M | $129M | $159M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $5M | $24M | $20M | $61M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $146M | $586M | $0 | $149M | $220M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.77x | -0.28x | — | 0.84x | -0.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CTRN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CTRN five years ago would be worth $4,502 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $384 for PLCE. Over the past 12 months, CTRN leads with a +105.4% total return vs CURV's -72.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CTRN at 42.3% vs PLCE's -51.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.7% | -27.1% | -25.4% | +46.2% | +12.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.7% | -44.9% | -34.2% | -72.8% | +105.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.3% | -88.7% | -85.1% | -58.4% | +188.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.2% | -96.2% | -57.3% | -93.6% | -55.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.0% | -86.8% | -87.4% | -93.6% | +183.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.9% | -51.7% | -46.9% | -25.4% | +42.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CURV and CTRN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CURV is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DXLG's 2.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CTRN currently trades 82.9% from its 52-week high vs CURV's 24.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.88x | 2.28x | 2.30x | 0.46x | 1.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.92 | $9.56 | $1.69 | $6.37 | $56.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.20 | $2.76 | $0.43 | $0.94 | $22.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.0% | +31.5% | +39.7% | +24.3% | +82.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.6 | 41.8 | 54.4 | 35.3 | 44.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 61K | 352K | 144K | 847K | 91K |
Analyst Outlook
PLCE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CURV as "Hold", CTRN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.2% upside for CTRN (target: $68) vs -2.6% for CURV (target: $2). CATO is the only dividend payer here at 18.52% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $1.51 | $68.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 10 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +18.5% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.55 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.3% | +1.0% | +37.4% | 0.0% | +0.9% |
CURV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PLCE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
CATO vs PLCE vs DXLG vs CURV vs CTRN: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CATO or PLCE or DXLG or CURV or CTRN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Citi Trends, Inc.
(CTRN) is the stronger pick with 0. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 5% for The Children's Place, Inc. (PLCE). Analysts rate Citi Trends, Inc. (CTRN) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CATO or PLCE or DXLG or CURV or CTRN?
Over the past 5 years, Citi Trends, Inc.
(CTRN) delivered a total return of -55. 0%, compared to -96. 2% for The Children's Place, Inc. (PLCE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CTRN returned +183. 0% versus CURV's -93. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CATO or PLCE or DXLG or CURV or CTRN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Torrid Holdings Inc.
(CURV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Destination XL Group, Inc. 's 2. 30β — meaning DXLG is approximately 403% more volatile than CURV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Cato Corporation (CATO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 90% versus 195% for Citi Trends, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CATO or PLCE or DXLG or CURV or CTRN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Citi Trends, Inc.
(CTRN) is pulling ahead at 0. 7% versus -13. 5% for The Children's Place, Inc. (PLCE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Children's Place, Inc. grew EPS 63. 3% year-over-year, compared to -1420. 0% for Destination XL Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CATO leads at -5. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CATO or PLCE or DXLG or CURV or CTRN?
Torrid Holdings Inc.
(CURV) is the more profitable company, earning -0. 7% net margin versus -8. 3% for Destination XL Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps -0. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CURV leads at 2. 1% versus -5. 2% for CTRN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DXLG leads at 43. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CATO or PLCE or DXLG or CURV or CTRN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CTRN: 45.
2% to $68. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — CATO or PLCE or DXLG or CURV or CTRN?
In this comparison, CATO (18.
5% yield) pays a dividend. PLCE, DXLG, CURV, CTRN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is CATO or PLCE or DXLG or CURV or CTRN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Cato Corporation (CATO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
88), 18. 5% yield). Destination XL Group, Inc. (DXLG) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CATO: -71. 0%, DXLG: -87. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CATO and PLCE and DXLG and CURV and CTRN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CATO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PLCE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DXLG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CURV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CTRN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CATO pays a dividend while PLCE, DXLG, CURV, CTRN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.