Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CBAT vs CLFD vs CCOI vs MVST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Telecommunications Services
Electrical Equipment & Parts
CBAT vs CLFD vs CCOI vs MVST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Communication Equipment | Telecommunications Services | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $70M | $519M | $817M | $611M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $162M | $136M | $949M | $428M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-9M | $-170M | $-29M |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | 37.2% | 32.4% | 28.6% |
| Operating Margin | -10.5% | 1.4% | -7.9% | 1.6% |
| Forward P/E | 6.0x | 72.1x | — | 31.5x |
| Total Debt | $30M | $9M | $2.93B | $186M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $21M | $205M | $105M |
CBAT vs CLFD vs CCOI vs MVST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CBAK Energy Technol… (CBAT) | 100 | 163.6 | +63.6% |
| Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) | 100 | 271.1 | +171.1% |
| Cogent Communicatio… (CCOI) | 100 | 21.3 | -78.7% |
| Microvast Holdings,… (MVST) | 100 | 18.8 | -81.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CBAT vs CLFD vs CCOI vs MVST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CBAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.05
- Lower P/E (6.0x vs 31.5x)
- -4.0% margin vs CCOI's -17.9%
- Beta 1.05 vs MVST's 2.45, lower leverage
CLFD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 106.7% 10Y total return vs CCOI's 13.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.79, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 5.42x
- 19.6% revenue growth vs CBAT's -13.6%
- +20.2% vs CCOI's -65.4%
CCOI is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.67, yield 19.2%, current ratio 2.04x
- 19.2% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
MVST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.6%, EPS growth 85.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.6% revenue growth vs CBAT's -13.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.0x vs 31.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -4.0% margin vs CCOI's -17.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.05 vs MVST's 2.45, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 19.2% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.2% vs CCOI's -65.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -2.0% ROA vs CCOI's -5.4%, ROIC 4.6% vs -3.1% |
CBAT vs CLFD vs CCOI vs MVST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CBAT vs CLFD vs CCOI vs MVST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CBAT leads in 2 of 6 categories
CLFD leads 2 • MVST leads 1 • CCOI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MVST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCOI is the larger business by revenue, generating $949M annually — 7.0x CLFD's $136M. CBAT is the more profitable business, keeping -4.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CCOI's -17.9%. On growth, CBAT holds the edge at +36.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $162M | $136M | $949M | $428M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | $6M | $174M | $32M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$9M | -$170M | -$29M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | $15M | -$208M | $56M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +37.2% | +32.4% | +28.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.5% | +1.4% | -7.9% | +1.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | -6.3% | -17.9% | -6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | +10.8% | -21.9% | +13.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.5% | -27.1% | -3.2% | -15.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -142.5% | +23.9% | +119.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CBAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CBAT's 5.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MVST's 99.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $70M | $519M | $817M | $611M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $94M | $506M | $3.5B | $692M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.04x | -64.64x | -4.29x | -21.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 72.10x | — | 31.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.22x | 61.46x | 21.30x | 99.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.40x | 3.46x | 0.84x | 1.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.59x | 2.05x | — | 1.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.13x | 21.01x | — | 10.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLFD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLFD delivers a -3.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-2 for CCOI. CLFD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MVST's 0.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CBAT scores 7/9 vs CCOI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.5% | -3.4% | -2.3% | -7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.0% | -3.0% | -5.4% | -2.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.6% | +0.6% | -3.1% | +0.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.0% | +0.8% | -3.6% | +1.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.03x | — | 0.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $23M | -$13M | $2.7B | $81M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $21M | $205M | $105M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $9M | $2.9B | $186M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -24.86x | 85.32x | -0.52x | -16.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLFD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLFD five years ago would be worth $9,591 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,559 for MVST. Over the past 12 months, CLFD leads with a +20.2% total return vs CCOI's -65.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MVST at 16.7% vs CCOI's -26.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.7% | +27.1% | -20.8% | -33.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.9% | +20.2% | -65.4% | -2.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.0% | +3.9% | -60.0% | +58.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.0% | -4.1% | -57.6% | -84.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.9% | +106.7% | +13.1% | -80.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.7% | +1.3% | -26.3% | +16.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CBAT and CLFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CBAT is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MVST's 2.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLFD currently trades 80.2% from its 52-week high vs MVST's 26.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.05x | 1.79x | 1.67x | 2.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.25 | $46.76 | $55.24 | $7.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.77 | $24.01 | $14.82 | $1.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.8% | +80.2% | +29.5% | +26.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.6 | 57.1 | 34.3 | 54.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 111K | 146K | 1.2M | 3.9M |
Analyst Outlook
CBAT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CLFD as "Buy", CCOI as "Hold", MVST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 154.0% upside for MVST (target: $5) vs 14.7% for CLFD (target: $43). CCOI is the only dividend payer here at 19.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $43.00 | $27.50 | $4.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 | 32 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +19.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.13 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% | +2.0% | 0.0% |
CBAT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). CLFD leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
CBAT vs CLFD vs CCOI vs MVST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CBAT or CLFD or CCOI or MVST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) is the stronger pick with 19. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 6% for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT). CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CBAT or CLFD or CCOI or MVST?
On forward P/E, Microvast Holdings, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 31. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CBAT or CLFD or CCOI or MVST?
Over the past 5 years, Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) delivered a total return of -4. 1%, compared to -84. 4% for Microvast Holdings, Inc. (MVST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLFD returned +106. 7% versus MVST's -80. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CBAT or CLFD or CCOI or MVST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
(CBAT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 05β versus Microvast Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 45β — meaning MVST is approximately 134% more volatile than CBAT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 45% for Microvast Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CBAT or CLFD or CCOI or MVST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) is pulling ahead at 19. 6% versus -13. 6% for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. grew EPS 574. 5% year-over-year, compared to 11. 6% for Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CBAT leads at 49. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CBAT or CLFD or CCOI or MVST?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
(CBAT) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 7% net margin versus -18. 7% for Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CBAT leads at 5. 0% versus -10. 6% for CCOI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLFD leads at 33. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CBAT or CLFD or CCOI or MVST more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Microvast Holdings, Inc.
(MVST) trades at 31. 5x forward P/E versus 72. 1x for Clearfield, Inc. — 40. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MVST: 154. 0% to $4. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — CBAT or CLFD or CCOI or MVST?
In this comparison, CCOI (19.
2% yield) pays a dividend. CBAT, CLFD, MVST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CBAT or CLFD or CCOI or MVST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc.
(CCOI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (19. 2% yield). Microvast Holdings, Inc. (MVST) carries a higher beta of 2. 45 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CCOI: +13. 1%, MVST: -80. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CBAT and CLFD and CCOI and MVST?
These companies operate in different sectors (CBAT (Industrials) and CLFD (Technology) and CCOI (Communication Services) and MVST (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CBAT is a small-cap deep-value stock; CLFD is a small-cap high-growth stock; CCOI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MVST is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CCOI pays a dividend while CBAT, CLFD, MVST do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 19%
- Dividend Yield > 7.6%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.