Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
CBFV logo
CBFV
BFST logo
BFST
FIS logo
FIS
FISV logo
FISV
JKHY logo
JKHY
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CBFV vs BFST vs FIS vs FISV vs JKHY

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CBFV
CB Financial Services, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$190M
5Y Perf.+71.9%
BFST
Business First Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$956M
5Y Perf.+90.5%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-44.9%
FISV
Fiserv, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$28.76B
5Y Perf.-13.2%
JKHY
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.28B
5Y Perf.-30.3%

CBFV vs BFST vs FIS vs FISV vs JKHY — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CBFV logoCBFV
BFST logoBFST
FIS logoFIS
FISV logoFISV
JKHY logoJKHY
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalInformation Technology ServicesInformation Technology ServicesInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$190M$956M$20.26B$28.76B$9.28B
Revenue (TTM)$69M$512M$11.66B$21.09B$2.52B
Net Income (TTM)$5M$88M$2.67B$3.20B$519M
Gross Margin62.5%60.9%37.6%60.8%44.1%
Operating Margin7.7%22.2%17.9%24.4%26.0%
Forward P/E12.6x9.8x6.2x6.6x18.7x
Total Debt$35M$551M$4.01B$29.12B$0.00
Cash & Equiv.$32M$411M$599M$798M$102M

CBFV vs BFST vs FIS vs FISV vs JKHYLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CBFV
BFST
FIS
FISV
JKHY
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
CB Financial Servic… (CBFV)100171.9+71.9%
Business First Banc… (BFST)100190.5+90.5%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%
Fiserv, Inc. (FISV)10055.1-44.9%
Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY)10069.7-30.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CBFV vs BFST vs FIS vs FISV vs JKHY

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FIS and JKHY are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. CBFV, BFST, and FISV also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CBFV
CB Financial Services, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CBFV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 114.0% 10Y total return vs JKHY's 74.8%
  • +34.6% vs FISV's -68.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
BFST
Business First Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BFST is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.

  • NIM 3.3% vs CBFV's 3.3%
  • 11.8% NII/revenue growth vs CBFV's -13.3%
Best for: bank quality
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

FIS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and dividends.

  • 22.9% margin vs CBFV's 7.1%
  • 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: quality and dividends
FISV
Fiserv, Inc.
The Value Pick

FISV is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.19 vs JKHY's 1.86
  • Lower P/E (6.6x vs 18.7x), PEG 0.19 vs 1.86
Best for: valuation efficiency
JKHY
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
The Income Pick

JKHY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 0.10, yield 1.8%
  • Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.10, current ratio 1.27x
  • Beta 0.10, yield 1.8%, current ratio 1.27x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBFST logoBFST11.8% NII/revenue growth vs CBFV's -13.3%
ValueFISV logoFISVLower P/E (6.6x vs 18.7x), PEG 0.19 vs 1.86
Quality / MarginsFIS logoFIS22.9% margin vs CBFV's 7.1%
Stability / SafetyJKHY logoJKHYBeta 0.10 vs FISV's 0.87
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)CBFV logoCBFV+34.6% vs FISV's -68.0%
Efficiency (ROA)JKHY logoJKHY17.0% ROA vs CBFV's 0.3%, ROIC 21.0% vs 2.1%

CBFV vs BFST vs FIS vs FISV vs JKHY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
CBFVCB Financial Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Deposit Account
89.5%$2M
Financial Service, Other
10.3%$252,000
Insurance Commissions
0.2%$4,000
BFSTBusiness First Bancshares, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B
FISVFiserv, Inc.
FY 2024
Processing And Services
81.3%$16.6B
Product
18.7%$3.8B
JKHYJack Henry & Associates, Inc.
FY 2025
Payments
38.2%$873M
Core Segment
32.3%$739M
Complementary
29.5%$675M

CBFV vs BFST vs FIS vs FISV vs JKHY — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCBFVLAGGINGBFST

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

FISV is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.1B annually — 307.2x CBFV's $69M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CBFV's 7.1%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCBFV logoCBFVCB Financial Serv…BFST logoBFSTBusiness First Ba…FIS logoFISFidelity National…FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$69M$512M$11.7B$21.1B$2.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$7M$119M$4.1B$7.5B$810M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$5M$88M$2.7B$3.2B$519M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$17M$88M$2.8B$4.0B$728M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+62.5%+60.9%+37.6%+60.8%+44.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+7.7%+22.2%+17.9%+24.4%+26.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+7.1%+17.2%+22.9%+15.2%+20.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+24.8%+17.1%+23.9%+19.0%+28.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%-2.0%+8.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+93.5%+39.2%+30.6%-29.1%+12.5%
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FISV leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 8.5x trailing earnings, FISV trades at a 84% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FISV offers better value at 0.24x vs FIS's 2.14x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCBFV logoCBFVCB Financial Serv…BFST logoBFSTBusiness First Ba…FIS logoFISFidelity National…FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…
Market CapShares × price$190M$956M$20.3B$28.8B$9.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$193M$1.1B$23.7B$57.1B$9.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS40.78x10.52x52.27x8.48x20.55x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.62x9.78x6.24x6.62x18.72x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.94x2.14x0.24x2.04x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple27.19x9.20x6.50x6.44x11.87x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.77x1.87x1.90x1.36x3.91x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.26x0.97x1.46x1.14x4.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.09x10.38x7.21x6.63x15.78x
FISV leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JKHY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

JKHY delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $3 for CBFV. CBFV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FISV's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BFST scores 7/9 vs FISV's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCBFV logoCBFVCB Financial Serv…BFST logoBFSTBusiness First Ba…FIS logoFISFidelity National…FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+3.2%+10.2%+18.4%+12.4%+24.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.3%+1.1%+7.5%+4.0%+17.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.1%+6.2%+6.0%+8.1%+21.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.9%+8.9%+6.6%+10.2%+22.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–957656
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.22x0.61x0.29x1.13x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3M$140M$3.4B$28.3B-$102M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$32M$411M$599M$798M$102M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$35M$551M$4.0B$29.1B$0
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.21x0.59x21.16x6.39x122.37x
JKHY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CBFV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CBFV five years ago would be worth $19,369 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CBFV leads with a +34.6% total return vs FISV's -68.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CBFV at 26.8% vs FISV's -23.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCBFV logoCBFVCB Financial Serv…BFST logoBFSTBusiness First Ba…FIS logoFISFidelity National…FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+9.8%+14.1%-38.9%-18.0%-27.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+34.6%+23.9%-49.4%-68.0%-27.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+103.8%+97.0%-18.9%-54.3%-15.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+93.7%+38.7%-67.3%-50.7%-14.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+114.0%+31.2%-25.6%+1.8%+74.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+26.8%+25.4%-6.8%-23.0%-5.3%
CBFV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CBFV and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FISV's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CBFV currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs FISV's 30.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCBFV logoCBFVCB Financial Serv…BFST logoBFSTBusiness First Ba…FIS logoFISFidelity National…FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.41x0.79x0.61x0.87x0.10x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$37.92$30.32$82.74$177.36$193.39
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$27.11$22.52$37.91$51.78$124.63
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.9%+96.4%+47.4%+30.3%+66.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10067.164.230.840.827.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded4K175K5.6M5.7M1.2M
Evenly matched — CBFV and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — FIS and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CBFV as "Hold", BFST as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", FISV as "Buy", JKHY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs 10.6% for BFST (target: $32). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs JKHY's 1.76%.

MetricCBFV logoCBFVCB Financial Serv…BFST logoBFSTBusiness First Ba…FIS logoFISFidelity National…FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$32.33$62.88$71.15$194.63
# AnalystsCovering analysts34376022
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.6%+1.9%+4.2%+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises17122
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.97$0.57$1.63$2.25
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.6%+0.4%+7.0%+20.5%+0.4%
Evenly matched — FIS and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FISV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallCB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CBFV vs BFST vs FIS vs FISV vs JKHY: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CBFV or BFST or FIS or FISV or JKHY a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Business First Bancshares, Inc.

(BFST) is the stronger pick with 11. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 3% for CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV). Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Business First Bancshares, Inc. (BFST) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CBFV or BFST or FIS or FISV or JKHY?

On trailing P/E, Fiserv, Inc.

(FISV) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fiserv, Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 1. 86x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CBFV or BFST or FIS or FISV or JKHY?

Over the past 5 years, CB Financial Services, Inc.

(CBFV) delivered a total return of +93. 7%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CBFV returned +114. 0% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CBFV or BFST or FIS or FISV or JKHY?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 10β versus Fiserv, Inc. 's 0. 87β — meaning FISV is approximately 743% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 113% for Fiserv, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CBFV or BFST or FIS or FISV or JKHY?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Business First Bancshares, Inc.

(BFST) is pulling ahead at 11. 8% versus -13. 3% for CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Business First Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 23. 0% year-over-year, compared to -61. 3% for CB Financial Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JKHY leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CBFV or BFST or FIS or FISV or JKHY?

Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

(JKHY) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 2% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FISV leads at 26. 9% versus 7. 7% for CBFV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBFV leads at 62. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CBFV or BFST or FIS or FISV or JKHY more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 1. 86x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 18. 7x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 12. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CBFV or BFST or FIS or FISV or JKHY?

In this comparison, FIS (4.

2% yield), CBFV (2. 6% yield), BFST (1. 9% yield), JKHY (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. FISV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CBFV or BFST or FIS or FISV or JKHY better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

(JKHY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 10), 1. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKHY: +74. 8%, FISV: +1. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CBFV and BFST and FIS and FISV and JKHY?

These companies operate in different sectors (CBFV (Financial Services) and BFST (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and FISV (Technology) and JKHY (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CBFV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BFST is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; FISV is a mid-cap deep-value stock; JKHY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CBFV, BFST, FIS, JKHY pay a dividend while FISV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.