Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
CBFV logo
CBFV
FUNC logo
FUNC
CZWI logo
CZWI
MNSB logo
MNSB
FIS logo
FIS
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CBFV vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs FIS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CBFV
CB Financial Services, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$190M
5Y Perf.+71.9%
FUNC
First United Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$272M
5Y Perf.+213.9%
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$207M
5Y Perf.+212.8%
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$184M
5Y Perf.+88.9%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-70.8%

CBFV vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs FIS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CBFV logoCBFV
FUNC logoFUNC
CZWI logoCZWI
MNSB logoMNSB
FIS logoFIS
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$190M$272M$207M$184M$20.26B
Revenue (TTM)$69M$120M$90M$135M$11.66B
Net Income (TTM)$5M$25M$14M$16M$2.67B
Gross Margin62.5%70.3%54.7%54.3%37.6%
Operating Margin7.7%27.2%7.0%14.1%17.9%
Forward P/E12.6x9.7x11.8x11.0x6.2x
Total Debt$35M$115M$52M$70M$4.01B
Cash & Equiv.$32M$132M$119M$26M$599M

CBFV vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs FISLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CBFV
FUNC
CZWI
MNSB
FIS
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
CB Financial Servic… (CBFV)100171.9+71.9%
First United Corpor… (FUNC)100313.9+213.9%
Citizens Community … (CZWI)100312.8+212.8%
MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB)100188.9+88.9%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CBFV vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs FIS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FIS leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. First United Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. CBFV and CZWI also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇FIS emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
CBFV
CB Financial Services, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CBFV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.41, yield 2.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.41, Low D/E 22.1%, current ratio 0.02x
  • Beta 0.41, yield 2.6%, current ratio 0.02x
  • NIM 3.3% vs CZWI's 2.9%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
FUNC
First United Corporation
The Banking Pick

FUNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 6.6%, EPS growth 19.7%
  • 361.3% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 149.0%
  • 6.6% NII/revenue growth vs CBFV's -13.3%
  • 2.2% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs FIS's 4.2%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +52.1% vs FIS's -49.4%
Best for: momentum
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, MNSB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Value Pick

FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.26 vs CZWI's 2.32
  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.26 vs 2.32
  • 22.9% margin vs CBFV's 7.1%
  • 7.5% ROA vs CBFV's 0.3%, ROIC 6.0% vs 2.1%
Best for: valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFUNC logoFUNC6.6% NII/revenue growth vs CBFV's -13.3%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.2x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.26 vs 2.32
Quality / MarginsFIS logoFIS22.9% margin vs CBFV's 7.1%
Stability / SafetyCBFV logoCBFVBeta 0.41 vs FUNC's 0.67, lower leverage
DividendsFUNC logoFUNC2.2% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs FIS's 4.2%
Momentum (1Y)CZWI logoCZWI+52.1% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)FIS logoFIS7.5% ROA vs CBFV's 0.3%, ROIC 6.0% vs 2.1%

CBFV vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
CBFVCB Financial Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Deposit Account
89.5%$2M
Financial Service, Other
10.3%$252,000
Insurance Commissions
0.2%$4,000
FUNCFirst United Corporation
FY 2025
Trust Department
53.3%$10M
Debit Card Income
22.0%$4M
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts
12.2%$2M
Brokerage Commissions
7.8%$1M
Other Service Charges
4.6%$845,000
CZWICitizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$99M
MNSBMainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Core Banking Segment
100.0%$134M
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B

CBFV vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs FIS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFUNCLAGGINGMNSB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — FUNC and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 169.8x CBFV's $69M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CBFV's 7.1%.

MetricCBFV logoCBFVCB Financial Serv…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$69M$120M$90M$135M$11.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$7M$35M$9M$23M$4.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$5M$25M$14M$16M$2.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$17M$16M$11M$11M$2.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+62.5%+70.3%+54.7%+54.3%+37.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+7.7%+27.2%+7.0%+14.1%+17.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+7.1%+20.5%+16.0%+11.5%+22.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+24.8%+13.1%+12.4%+7.9%+23.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+93.5%+20.2%+63.0%+120.9%+30.6%
Evenly matched — FUNC and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 11.1x trailing earnings, FUNC trades at a 79% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FUNC offers better value at 0.85x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCBFV logoCBFVCB Financial Serv…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Market CapShares × price$190M$272M$207M$184M$20.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$193M$255M$140M$227M$23.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS40.78x11.11x14.70x14.16x52.27x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.62x9.66x11.79x11.03x6.24x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.85x2.90x2.14x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple27.19x7.85x15.69x11.90x6.50x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.77x2.28x2.29x1.35x1.90x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.26x1.34x1.11x0.87x1.46x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.09x17.67x19.90x17.26x7.21x
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — FUNC and FIS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $3 for CBFV. CBFV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FUNC scores 7/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCBFV logoCBFVCB Financial Serv…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+3.2%+12.6%+7.8%+7.3%+18.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.3%+1.2%+0.8%+0.7%+7.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.1%+7.1%+2.0%+5.0%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.9%+9.8%+0.6%+6.0%+6.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–957656
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.22x0.56x0.28x0.32x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3M-$17M-$67M$43M$3.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$32M$132M$119M$26M$599M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$35M$115M$52M$70M$4.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.21x0.99x0.16x0.31x21.16x
Evenly matched — FUNC and FIS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $24,187 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +52.1% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 43.0% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCBFV logoCBFVCB Financial Serv…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+9.8%+14.3%+24.3%+26.5%-38.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+34.6%+44.4%+52.1%+37.2%-49.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+103.8%+192.2%+153.7%+13.1%-18.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+93.7%+141.9%+69.0%+18.1%-67.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+114.0%+361.3%+149.0%+135.4%-25.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+26.8%+43.0%+36.4%+4.2%-6.8%
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CBFV and MNSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CBFV is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUNC's 0.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNSB currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCBFV logoCBFVCB Financial Serv…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.41x0.67x0.50x0.60x0.61x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$37.92$42.35$22.62$25.17$82.74
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$27.11$28.00$12.83$17.86$37.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.9%+98.9%+94.9%+99.0%+47.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10067.171.651.265.330.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded4K13K41K45K5.6M
Evenly matched — CBFV and MNSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — FUNC and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CBFV as "Hold", FUNC as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", MNSB as "Hold", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -40.3% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs MNSB's 1.60%.

MetricCBFV logoCBFVCB Financial Serv…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$25.00$62.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts312137
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.6%+2.2%+1.7%+1.6%+4.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises17601
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.97$0.92$0.37$0.40$1.63
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.6%0.0%+3.0%+2.4%+7.0%
Evenly matched — FUNC and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). FUNC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.

Best OverallFirst United Corporation (FUNC)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CBFV vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs FIS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CBFV or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB or FIS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger pick with 6.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 3% for CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV). First United Corporation (FUNC) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First United Corporation (FUNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CBFV or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB or FIS?

On trailing P/E, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the cheapest at 11.

1x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CBFV or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB or FIS?

Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +141.

9%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +361. 3% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CBFV or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB or FIS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CB Financial Services, Inc.

(CBFV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus First United Corporation's 0. 67β — meaning FUNC is approximately 61% more volatile than CBFV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 56% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CBFV or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB or FIS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), First United Corporation (FUNC) is pulling ahead at 6.

6% versus -13. 3% for CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to -61. 3% for CB Financial Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CBFV or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB or FIS?

First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more profitable company, earning 20.

6% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUNC leads at 27. 3% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUNC leads at 70. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CBFV or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB or FIS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for CB Financial Services, Inc. — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CBFV or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB or FIS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 6% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB).

09

Is CBFV or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CB Financial Services, Inc.

(CBFV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 41), 2. 6% yield, +114. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBFV: +114. 0%, FIS: -25. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CBFV and FUNC and CZWI and MNSB and FIS?

These companies operate in different sectors (CBFV (Financial Services) and FUNC (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and MNSB (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CBFV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FUNC is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.