Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
CBFV logo
CBFV
MNSB logo
MNSB
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CBFV vs MNSB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CBFV
CB Financial Services, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$190M
5Y Perf.+71.9%
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$184M
5Y Perf.+88.9%

CBFV vs MNSB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CBFV logoCBFV
MNSB logoMNSB
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$190M$184M
Revenue (TTM)$69M$135M
Net Income (TTM)$5M$16M
Gross Margin62.5%54.3%
Operating Margin7.7%14.1%
Forward P/E12.6x11.0x
Total Debt$35M$70M
Cash & Equiv.$32M$26M

CBFV vs MNSBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CBFV
MNSB
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
CB Financial Servic… (CBFV)100171.9+71.9%
MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB)100188.9+88.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CBFV vs MNSB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MNSB leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. CB Financial Services, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇MNSB emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
CBFV
CB Financial Services, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CBFV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.41, yield 2.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.41, Low D/E 22.1%, current ratio 0.02x
  • Beta 0.41, yield 2.6%, current ratio 0.02x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MNSB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth -1.4%, EPS growth 210.0%
  • 135.4% 10Y total return vs CBFV's 114.0%
  • -1.4% NII/revenue growth vs CBFV's -13.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMNSB logoMNSB-1.4% NII/revenue growth vs CBFV's -13.3%
ValueMNSB logoMNSBLower P/E (11.0x vs 12.6x)
Quality / MarginsMNSB logoMNSBEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs CBFV's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyCBFV logoCBFVBeta 0.41 vs MNSB's 0.60, lower leverage
DividendsCBFV logoCBFV2.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MNSB's 1.6%
Momentum (1Y)MNSB logoMNSB+37.2% vs CBFV's +34.6%
Efficiency (ROA)MNSB logoMNSBEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs CBFV's 0.5%

CBFV vs MNSB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CBFVCB Financial Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Deposit Account
89.5%$2M
Financial Service, Other
10.3%$252,000
Insurance Commissions
0.2%$4,000
MNSBMainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Core Banking Segment
100.0%$134M

CBFV vs MNSB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMNSBLAGGINGCBFV

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MNSB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

MNSB is the larger business by revenue, generating $135M annually — 2.0x CBFV's $69M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 11.5% (MNSB) to 7.1% (CBFV).

MetricCBFV logoCBFVCB Financial Serv…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$69M$135M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$7M$23M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$5M$16M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$17M$11M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+62.5%+54.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+7.7%+14.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+7.1%+11.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+24.8%+7.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+93.5%+120.9%
MNSB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MNSB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 14.2x trailing earnings, MNSB trades at a 65% valuation discount to CBFV's 40.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MNSB's 11.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CBFV's 27.2x.

MetricCBFV logoCBFVCB Financial Serv…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
Market CapShares × price$190M$184M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$193M$227M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS40.78x14.16x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.62x11.03x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple27.19x11.90x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.77x1.35x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.26x0.87x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.09x17.26x
MNSB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MNSB leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

MNSB delivers a 7.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $3 for CBFV. CBFV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MNSB's 0.32x.

MetricCBFV logoCBFVCB Financial Serv…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+3.2%+7.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.3%+0.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.1%+5.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.9%+6.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–955
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.22x0.32x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3M$43M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$32M$26M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$35M$70M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.21x0.31x
MNSB leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — CBFV and MNSB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CBFV five years ago would be worth $19,369 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,813 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, MNSB leads with a +37.2% total return vs CBFV's +34.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CBFV at 26.8% vs MNSB's 4.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCBFV logoCBFVCB Financial Serv…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+9.8%+26.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+34.6%+37.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+103.8%+13.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+93.7%+18.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+114.0%+135.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+26.8%+4.2%
Evenly matched — CBFV and MNSB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CBFV and MNSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CBFV is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNSB's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricCBFV logoCBFVCB Financial Serv…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.41x0.60x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$37.92$25.17
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$27.11$17.86
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.9%+99.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10067.165.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded4K45K
Evenly matched — CBFV and MNSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CBFV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates CBFV as "Hold" and MNSB as "Hold". For income investors, CBFV offers the higher dividend yield at 2.58% vs MNSB's 1.60%.

MetricCBFV logoCBFVCB Financial Serv…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target
# AnalystsCovering analysts31
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.6%+1.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.97$0.40
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.6%+2.4%
CBFV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MNSB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CBFV leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.

Best OverallMainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CBFV vs MNSB: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CBFV or MNSB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

(MNSB) is the stronger pick with -1. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 3% for CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV). MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (11. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV) a "Hold" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CBFV or MNSB?

On trailing P/E, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

(MNSB) is the cheapest at 14. 2x versus CB Financial Services, Inc. at 40. 8x. On forward P/E, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CBFV or MNSB?

Over the past 5 years, CB Financial Services, Inc.

(CBFV) delivered a total return of +93. 7%, compared to +18. 1% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNSB returned +135. 4% versus CBFV's +114. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CBFV or MNSB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CB Financial Services, Inc.

(CBFV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 60β — meaning MNSB is approximately 45% more volatile than CBFV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 32% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CBFV or MNSB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

(MNSB) is pulling ahead at -1. 4% versus -13. 3% for CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to -61. 3% for CB Financial Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CBFV or MNSB?

MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

(MNSB) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 5% net margin versus 7. 1% for CB Financial Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNSB leads at 14. 0% versus 7. 7% for CBFV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBFV leads at 62. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CBFV or MNSB more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

(MNSB) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for CB Financial Services, Inc. — 1. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CBFV or MNSB?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 1. 6% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB).

09

Is CBFV or MNSB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CB Financial Services, Inc.

(CBFV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 41), 2. 6% yield, +114. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBFV: +114. 0%, MNSB: +135. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CBFV and MNSB?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CBFV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.