Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
CBFV logo
CBFV
MNSB logo
MNSB
CARE logo
CARE
FUNC logo
FUNC
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CBFV vs MNSB vs CARE vs FUNC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CBFV
CB Financial Services, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$190M
5Y Perf.+71.9%
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$184M
5Y Perf.+88.9%
CARE
Carter Bankshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$662M
5Y Perf.+270.2%
FUNC
First United Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$272M
5Y Perf.+213.9%

CBFV vs MNSB vs CARE vs FUNC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CBFV logoCBFV
MNSB logoMNSB
CARE logoCARE
FUNC logoFUNC
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$190M$184M$662M$272M
Revenue (TTM)$69M$135M$252M$120M
Net Income (TTM)$5M$16M$31M$25M
Gross Margin62.5%54.3%61.2%70.3%
Operating Margin7.7%14.1%15.9%27.2%
Forward P/E12.6x11.0x5.5x9.7x
Total Debt$35M$70M$179M$115M
Cash & Equiv.$32M$26M$105M$132M

CBFV vs MNSB vs CARE vs FUNCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CBFV
MNSB
CARE
FUNC
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
CB Financial Servic… (CBFV)100171.9+71.9%
MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB)100188.9+88.9%
Carter Bankshares, … (CARE)100370.2+270.2%
First United Corpor… (FUNC)100313.9+213.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CBFV vs MNSB vs CARE vs FUNC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CBFV and MNSB are tied at the top with 2 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. CARE and FUNC also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CBFV
CB Financial Services, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CBFV has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.41, yield 2.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.41, Low D/E 22.1%, current ratio 0.02x
  • Beta 0.41, yield 2.6%, current ratio 0.02x
  • NIM 3.3% vs CARE's 2.7%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MNSB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CBFV's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
  • Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CBFV's 0.5%
Best for: quality and efficiency
CARE
Carter Bankshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CARE is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.

  • Lower P/E (5.5x vs 9.7x)
  • +79.6% vs CBFV's +34.6%
Best for: value and momentum
FUNC
First United Corporation
The Banking Pick

FUNC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 6.6%, EPS growth 19.7%
  • 361.3% 10Y total return vs CARE's 141.7%
  • 6.6% NII/revenue growth vs CBFV's -13.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFUNC logoFUNC6.6% NII/revenue growth vs CBFV's -13.3%
ValueCARE logoCARELower P/E (5.5x vs 9.7x)
Quality / MarginsMNSB logoMNSBEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs CBFV's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyCBFV logoCBFVBeta 0.41 vs FUNC's 0.67, lower leverage
DividendsCBFV logoCBFV2.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FUNC's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)CARE logoCARE+79.6% vs CBFV's +34.6%
Efficiency (ROA)MNSB logoMNSBEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs CBFV's 0.5%

CBFV vs MNSB vs CARE vs FUNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CBFVCB Financial Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Deposit Account
89.5%$2M
Financial Service, Other
10.3%$252,000
Insurance Commissions
0.2%$4,000
MNSBMainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Core Banking Segment
100.0%$134M
CARECarter Bankshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Bank Owned Life Insurance Income
74.0%$2M
Other Revenue
26.0%$532,000
FUNCFirst United Corporation
FY 2025
Trust Department
53.3%$10M
Debit Card Income
22.0%$4M
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts
12.2%$2M
Brokerage Commissions
7.8%$1M
Other Service Charges
4.6%$845,000

CBFV vs MNSB vs CARE vs FUNC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFUNCLAGGINGCARE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FUNC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

CARE is the larger business by revenue, generating $252M annually — 3.7x CBFV's $69M. FUNC is the more profitable business, keeping 20.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CBFV's 7.1%.

MetricCBFV logoCBFVCB Financial Serv…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$69M$135M$252M$120M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$7M$23M$46M$35M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$5M$16M$31M$25M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$17M$11M$30M$16M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+62.5%+54.3%+61.2%+70.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+7.7%+14.1%+15.9%+27.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+7.1%+11.5%+12.5%+20.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+24.8%+7.9%+11.9%+13.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+93.5%+120.9%+8.3%+20.2%
FUNC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — MNSB and FUNC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 11.1x trailing earnings, FUNC trades at a 73% valuation discount to CBFV's 40.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FUNC's 7.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CBFV's 27.2x.

MetricCBFV logoCBFVCB Financial Serv…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…
Market CapShares × price$190M$184M$662M$272M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$193M$227M$735M$255M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS40.78x14.16x21.34x11.11x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.62x11.03x5.47x9.66x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.85x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple27.19x11.90x18.38x7.85x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.77x1.35x2.60x2.28x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.26x0.87x1.60x1.34x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.09x17.26x20.81x17.67x
Evenly matched — MNSB and FUNC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FUNC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

FUNC delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $3 for CBFV. CBFV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CARE scores 8/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCBFV logoCBFVCB Financial Serv…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+3.2%+7.3%+7.6%+12.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.3%+0.7%+0.7%+1.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.1%+5.0%+5.7%+7.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.9%+6.0%+1.5%+9.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95587
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.22x0.32x0.43x0.56x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3M$43M$73M-$17M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$32M$26M$105M$132M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$35M$70M$179M$115M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.21x0.31x0.39x0.99x
FUNC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $24,187 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,813 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, CARE leads with a +79.6% total return vs CBFV's +34.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 43.0% vs MNSB's 4.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCBFV logoCBFVCB Financial Serv…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+9.8%+26.5%+54.3%+14.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+34.6%+37.2%+79.6%+44.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+103.8%+13.1%+93.9%+192.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+93.7%+18.1%+108.0%+141.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+114.0%+135.4%+141.7%+361.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+26.8%+4.2%+24.7%+43.0%
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CBFV and CARE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CBFV is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUNC's 0.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricCBFV logoCBFVCB Financial Serv…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.41x0.60x0.58x0.67x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$37.92$25.17$29.99$42.35
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$27.11$17.86$16.14$28.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.9%+99.0%+99.6%+98.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10067.165.372.871.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded4K45K316K13K
Evenly matched — CBFV and CARE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — CBFV and FUNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CBFV as "Hold", MNSB as "Hold", CARE as "Hold", FUNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -4.6% upside for CARE (target: $29) vs -40.3% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, CBFV offers the higher dividend yield at 2.58% vs MNSB's 1.60%.

MetricCBFV logoCBFVCB Financial Serv…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$28.50$25.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts3151
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.6%+1.6%+2.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1007
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.97$0.40$0.92
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.6%+2.4%+3.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — CBFV and FUNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FUNC leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.

Best OverallFirst United Corporation (FUNC)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CBFV vs MNSB vs CARE vs FUNC: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CBFV or MNSB or CARE or FUNC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger pick with 6.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 3% for CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV). First United Corporation (FUNC) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First United Corporation (FUNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CBFV or MNSB or CARE or FUNC?

On trailing P/E, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the cheapest at 11.

1x versus CB Financial Services, Inc. at 40. 8x. On forward P/E, Carter Bankshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CBFV or MNSB or CARE or FUNC?

Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +141.

9%, compared to +18. 1% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +361. 3% versus CBFV's +114. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CBFV or MNSB or CARE or FUNC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CB Financial Services, Inc.

(CBFV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus First United Corporation's 0. 67β — meaning FUNC is approximately 61% more volatile than CBFV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 56% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CBFV or MNSB or CARE or FUNC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), First United Corporation (FUNC) is pulling ahead at 6.

6% versus -13. 3% for CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to -61. 3% for CB Financial Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CBFV or MNSB or CARE or FUNC?

First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more profitable company, earning 20.

6% net margin versus 7. 1% for CB Financial Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUNC leads at 27. 3% versus 7. 7% for CBFV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUNC leads at 70. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CBFV or MNSB or CARE or FUNC more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Carter Bankshares, Inc.

(CARE) trades at 5. 5x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for CB Financial Services, Inc. — 7. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CARE: -4. 6% to $28. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CBFV or MNSB or CARE or FUNC?

In this comparison, CBFV (2.

6% yield), FUNC (2. 2% yield), MNSB (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. CARE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CBFV or MNSB or CARE or FUNC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CB Financial Services, Inc.

(CBFV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 41), 2. 6% yield, +114. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBFV: +114. 0%, CARE: +141. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CBFV and MNSB and CARE and FUNC?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CBFV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CARE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FUNC is a small-cap deep-value stock. CBFV, MNSB, FUNC pay a dividend while CARE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.