Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CBIO vs AGEN vs RCUS vs NKTR vs EXEL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
CBIO vs AGEN vs RCUS vs NKTR vs EXEL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $494M | $137M | $2.40B | $1.16B | $13.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12M | $124M | $236M | $56M | $2.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-162M | $65M | $-369M | $-158M | $833M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 52.1% | 90.7% | 99.4% | 71.6% |
| Operating Margin | -13.7% | 6.6% | -168.6% | -224.9% | 39.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.2x | — | — | 15.1x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $335M | $99M | $149M | $173M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $213M | $3M | $222M | $15M | $482M |
CBIO vs AGEN vs RCUS vs NKTR vs EXEL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crescent Biopharma,… (CBIO) | 100 | 4.8 | -95.2% |
| Agenus Inc. (AGEN) | 100 | 4.2 | -95.8% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 96.2 | -3.8% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 17.1 | -82.9% |
| Exelixis, Inc. (EXEL) | 100 | 223.8 | +123.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CBIO vs AGEN vs RCUS vs NKTR vs EXEL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CBIO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 6.56x
- Beta 0.87, current ratio 6.56x
- 365.3% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9%
AGEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.2%
- Lower P/E (4.2x vs 15.1x)
- 52.2% margin vs CBIO's -13.6%
- 31.0% ROA vs CBIO's -88.2%
Among these 5 stocks, RCUS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NKTR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +5.8% vs AGEN's -31.5%
EXEL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.81
- 6.2% 10Y total return vs RCUS's 40.0%
- Beta 0.81 vs AGEN's 2.26
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 365.3% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.2x vs 15.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 52.2% margin vs CBIO's -13.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs AGEN's 2.26 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.8% vs AGEN's -31.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 31.0% ROA vs CBIO's -88.2% |
CBIO vs AGEN vs RCUS vs NKTR vs EXEL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CBIO vs AGEN vs RCUS vs NKTR vs EXEL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AGEN leads in 2 of 6 categories
EXEL leads 2 • NKTR leads 1 • CBIO leads 0 • RCUS leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGEN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXEL is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 199.9x CBIO's $12M. AGEN is the more profitable business, keeping 52.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CBIO's -13.6%. On growth, AGEN holds the edge at +40.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12M | $124M | $236M | $56M | $2.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$163M | $16M | -$391M | -$124M | $958M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$162M | $65M | -$369M | -$158M | $833M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$27M | -$88M | -$489M | -$204M | $918M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +52.1% | +90.7% | +99.4% | +71.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.7% | +6.6% | -168.6% | -2.2% | +39.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.6% | +52.2% | -156.4% | -2.8% | +35.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -70.7% | -2.1% | -3.7% | +38.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +40.2% | -39.3% | +3.8% | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.3% | +199.0% | +10.5% | +49.7% | +43.6% |
Valuation Metrics
AGEN leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $494M | $137M | $2.4B | $1.2B | $13.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $283M | $469M | $2.3B | $1.3B | $13.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.40x | -970.59x | -7.23x | -6.10x | 19.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.20x | — | — | 15.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 14.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 45.56x | 1.20x | 9.70x | 21.01x | 5.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.92x | — | 4.05x | 11.15x | 6.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 15.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EXEL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EXEL delivers a 40.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $-101 for CBIO. CBIO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NKTR's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CBIO scores 7/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -100.9% | — | -69.0% | -87.0% | +40.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -88.2% | +31.0% | -35.3% | -40.7% | +30.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — | -64.1% | -57.2% | +32.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -132.6% | — | -42.1% | -55.7% | +35.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | — | 0.16x | 1.66x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$212M | $332M | -$123M | $134M | -$309M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $213M | $3M | $222M | $15M | $482M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $335M | $99M | $149M | $173M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -148.19x | 1.41x | -13.38x | -4.15x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EXEL five years ago would be worth $23,344 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $321 for AGEN. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +577.9% total return vs AGEN's -31.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 90.8% vs AGEN's -56.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +61.7% | +2.2% | +2.2% | +36.8% | +21.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.0% | -31.5% | +154.5% | +577.9% | +27.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.3% | -91.8% | +18.3% | +594.5% | +178.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.4% | -96.8% | -3.1% | -77.6% | +133.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | -95.9% | +40.0% | -73.6% | +619.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -54.0% | -56.5% | +5.8% | +90.8% | +40.7% |
Risk & Volatility
EXEL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EXEL is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGEN's 2.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EXEL currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs AGEN's 45.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 2.26x | 2.00x | 1.50x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.41 | $7.34 | $28.72 | $109.00 | $53.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.72 | $2.71 | $7.91 | $7.99 | $33.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.4% | +45.0% | +82.9% | +54.5% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.3 | 49.7 | 46.5 | 32.1 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 269K | 913K | 1.1M | 994K | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CBIO as "Buy", AGEN as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", EXEL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 151.9% upside for NKTR (target: $150) vs -10.9% for EXEL (target: $47).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $33.00 | $7.33 | $31.00 | $149.60 | $47.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 11 | 18 | 33 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +7.0% |
AGEN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). EXEL leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility).
CBIO vs AGEN vs RCUS vs NKTR vs EXEL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CBIO or AGEN or RCUS or NKTR or EXEL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). Exelixis, Inc. (EXEL) offers the better valuation at 19. 1x trailing P/E (15. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Crescent Biopharma, Inc. (CBIO) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CBIO or AGEN or RCUS or NKTR or EXEL?
On forward P/E, Agenus Inc.
is actually cheaper at 4. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CBIO or AGEN or RCUS or NKTR or EXEL?
Over the past 5 years, Exelixis, Inc.
(EXEL) delivered a total return of +133. 4%, compared to -96. 8% for Agenus Inc. (AGEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXEL returned +619. 9% versus CBIO's -97. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CBIO or AGEN or RCUS or NKTR or EXEL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exelixis, Inc.
(EXEL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Agenus Inc. 's 2. 26β — meaning AGEN is approximately 180% more volatile than EXEL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Crescent Biopharma, Inc. (CBIO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 166% for Nektar Therapeutics — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CBIO or AGEN or RCUS or NKTR or EXEL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agenus Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -815. 0% for Crescent Biopharma, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CBIO leads at 424. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CBIO or AGEN or RCUS or NKTR or EXEL?
Exelixis, Inc.
(EXEL) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 7% net margin versus -1419. 6% for Crescent Biopharma, Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXEL leads at 37. 6% versus -1407. 5% for CBIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBIO leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CBIO or AGEN or RCUS or NKTR or EXEL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) trades at 4. 2x forward P/E versus 15. 1x for Exelixis, Inc. — 10. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NKTR: 151. 9% to $149. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — CBIO or AGEN or RCUS or NKTR or EXEL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CBIO or AGEN or RCUS or NKTR or EXEL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exelixis, Inc.
(EXEL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), +619. 9% 10Y return). Agenus Inc. (AGEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 26 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXEL: +619. 9%, AGEN: -95. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CBIO and AGEN and RCUS and NKTR and EXEL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.