Banks
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CBK vs FFIN vs SFNC vs BOKF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
CBK vs FFIN vs SFNC vs BOKF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $422M | $4.83B | $3.27B | $8.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $129M | $826M | $618M | $3.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $38M | $254M | $-398M | $578M |
| Gross Margin | 69.8% | 71.8% | 4.5% | 63.7% |
| Operating Margin | 37.5% | 37.5% | -85.4% | 21.4% |
| Forward P/E | 10.5x | 16.5x | 10.9x | 13.1x |
| Total Debt | $167M | $22M | $641M | $4.63B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $0.00 | $1.08B | $380M | $1.66B |
CBK vs FFIN vs SFNC vs BOKF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 116.5 | +16.5% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 131.6 | +31.6% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 238.5 | +138.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CBK vs FFIN vs SFNC vs BOKF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for bank quality.
- NIM 3.5% vs BOKF's 2.5%
- Lower P/E (10.5x vs 16.5x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.50 vs SFNC's 0.89
FFIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.78, yield 2.2%
- Rev growth 11.7%, EPS growth 13.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.78, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 0.68x
- Beta 0.78, yield 2.2%, current ratio 0.68x
SFNC is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 3.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs BOKF's 1.8%
BOKF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 159.2% 10Y total return vs FFIN's 136.4%
- PEG 1.60 vs FFIN's 3.67
- +42.7% vs FFIN's -5.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.7% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.5x vs 16.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs SFNC's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs BOKF's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.7% vs FFIN's -5.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
CBK vs FFIN vs SFNC vs BOKF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CBK vs FFIN vs SFNC vs BOKF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
SFNC leads 1 • BOKF leads 1 • CBK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOKF is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.3B annually — 25.8x CBK's $129M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -64.3%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $129M | $826M | $618M | $3.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $50M | $320M | -$444M | $794M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $38M | $254M | -$398M | $578M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $37M | $283M | $410M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.8% | +71.8% | +4.5% | +63.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.5% | +37.5% | -85.4% | +21.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +29.3% | +30.7% | -64.3% | +17.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.4% | +34.3% | +66.4% | +51.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.1% | -7.7% | +42.1% | +1.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SFNC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.5x trailing earnings, CBK trades at a 45% valuation discount to FFIN's 19.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BOKF offers better value at 1.79x vs FFIN's 4.22x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $422M | $4.8B | $3.3B | $8.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $589M | $3.8B | $3.5B | $11.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.54x | 19.01x | -7.63x | 14.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.51x | 16.54x | 10.90x | 13.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.22x | — | 1.79x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.88x | 11.79x | — | 14.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.21x | 5.85x | 5.21x | 2.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.49x | 2.52x | 0.89x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.97x | 15.72x | 7.73x | 14.22x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CBK delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-11 for SFNC. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOKF's 0.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FFIN scores 8/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.3% | +14.2% | -11.5% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +1.7% | -1.6% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.1% | +12.4% | -9.1% | +5.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.8% | +16.6% | -4.2% | +8.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 0.01x | 0.19x | 0.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $167M | -$1.1B | $261M | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $0 | $1.1B | $380M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $167M | $22M | $641M | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.25x | 1.54x | -1.01x | 0.59x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BOKF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BOKF five years ago would be worth $16,653 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,409 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, BOKF leads with a +42.7% total return vs FFIN's -5.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BOKF at 17.2% vs CBK's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.6% | +13.5% | +20.7% | +14.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.6% | -5.5% | +23.0% | +42.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.6% | +24.3% | +37.1% | +60.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.6% | -25.9% | -11.5% | +66.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.6% | +136.4% | +26.2% | +159.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.7% | +7.5% | +11.1% | +17.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CBK and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFNC's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFNC currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 86.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 0.78x | 0.89x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.67 | $38.74 | $22.62 | $139.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.32 | $28.11 | $17.00 | $91.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.2% | +86.9% | +99.5% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.3 | 61.3 | 63.7 | 56.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 55K | 683K | 1.1M | 262K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SFNC and BOKF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FFIN as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy", BOKF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.6% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs -1.9% for BOKF (target: $132). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.79% vs CBK's 0.47%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $39.25 | $23.00 | $132.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 9 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | +2.2% | +3.8% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 15 | 14 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.14 | $0.74 | $0.85 | $2.42 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.1% |
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SFNC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CBK vs FFIN vs SFNC vs BOKF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CBK or FFIN or SFNC or BOKF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 11. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. Common Stock (CBK) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CBK or FFIN or SFNC or BOKF?
On trailing P/E, Commercial Bancgroup, Inc.
Common Stock (CBK) is the cheapest at 10. 5x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 19. 0x. On forward P/E, Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. Common Stock is actually cheaper at 10. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: BOK Financial Corporation wins at 1. 60x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 67x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CBK or FFIN or SFNC or BOKF?
Over the past 5 years, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) delivered a total return of +66.
5%, compared to -25. 9% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BOKF returned +159. 2% versus CBK's +21. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CBK or FFIN or SFNC or BOKF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Commercial Bancgroup, Inc.
Common Stock (CBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus Simmons First National Corporation's 0. 89β — meaning SFNC is approximately 77% more volatile than CBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 78% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CBK or FFIN or SFNC or BOKF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 11. 7% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. Common Stock grew EPS 15. 0% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CBK or FFIN or SFNC or BOKF?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 7% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 30. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 37. 5% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FFIN leads at 71. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CBK or FFIN or SFNC or BOKF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 60x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 67x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. Common Stock (CBK) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 16. 5x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 6. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 16. 6% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — CBK or FFIN or SFNC or BOKF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 0. 5% for Commercial Bancgroup, Inc. Common Stock (CBK).
09Is CBK or FFIN or SFNC or BOKF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 78), 2. 2% yield, +136. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FFIN: +136. 4%, CBK: +21. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CBK and FFIN and SFNC and BOKF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BOKF is a small-cap deep-value stock. FFIN, SFNC, BOKF pay a dividend while CBK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.