Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CBNK vs BWFG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
CBNK vs BWFG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $516M | $417M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $304M | $208M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $57M | $35M |
| Gross Margin | 73.6% | 51.6% |
| Operating Margin | 23.3% | 23.3% |
| Forward P/E | 9.3x | 9.7x |
| Total Debt | $52M | $180M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $31M | $225M |
CBNK vs BWFG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Bancorp, In… (CBNK) | 100 | 277.8 | +177.8% |
| Bankwell Financial … (BWFG) | 100 | 357.5 | +257.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CBNK vs BWFG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CBNK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 25.3%, EPS growth 60.4%
- NIM 5.4% vs BWFG's 2.9%
- 25.3% NII/revenue growth vs BWFG's 6.1%
BWFG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 1.5%
- 178.0% 10Y total return vs CBNK's 158.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84, Low D/E 59.6%, current ratio 1.89x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.3% NII/revenue growth vs BWFG's 6.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.3x vs 9.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CBNK's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs CBNK's 0.88 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, vs CBNK's 1.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.9% vs CBNK's +1.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CBNK's 0.5% |
CBNK vs BWFG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CBNK vs BWFG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CBNK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CBNK and BWFG operate at a comparable scale, with $304M and $208M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 18.8% (CBNK) to 16.9% (BWFG).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $304M | $208M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $79M | $53M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $57M | $35M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $67M | -$5M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.6% | +51.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.3% | +23.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.8% | +16.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.2% | +12.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +102.2% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CBNK leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.3x trailing earnings, CBNK trades at a 21% valuation discount to BWFG's 11.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BWFG offers better value at 0.28x vs CBNK's 0.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $516M | $417M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $537M | $372M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.30x | 11.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.31x | 9.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.73x | 0.28x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.30x | 7.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.70x | 2.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.30x | 1.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.65x | 15.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CBNK leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CBNK delivers a 14.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $12 for BWFG. CBNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BWFG's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CBNK scores 7/9 vs BWFG's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.8% | +12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.6% | +8.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $21M | -$45M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $31M | $225M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $52M | $180M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.16x | 0.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BWFG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BWFG five years ago would be worth $19,609 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,883 for CBNK. Over the past 12 months, BWFG leads with a +58.9% total return vs CBNK's +1.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BWFG at 34.9% vs CBNK's 27.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.2% | +16.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.1% | +58.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.0% | +145.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.8% | +96.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +158.8% | +178.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.9% | +34.9% |
Risk & Volatility
BWFG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BWFG is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CBNK's 0.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BWFG currently trades 97.2% from its 52-week high vs CBNK's 86.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.88x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.40 | $53.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.40 | $33.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.8% | +97.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.2 | 54.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 67K | 40K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CBNK and BWFG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CBNK as "Buy" and BWFG as "Buy". For income investors, BWFG offers the higher dividend yield at 1.53% vs CBNK's 1.40%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.44 | $0.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.3% | +0.3% |
CBNK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BWFG leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
CBNK vs BWFG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CBNK or BWFG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Capital Bancorp, Inc.
(CBNK) is the stronger pick with 25. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 1% for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG). Capital Bancorp, Inc. (CBNK) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (9. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Capital Bancorp, Inc. (CBNK) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CBNK or BWFG?
On trailing P/E, Capital Bancorp, Inc.
(CBNK) is the cheapest at 9. 3x versus Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. at 11. 8x. On forward P/E, Capital Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. wins at 0. 23x versus Capital Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 73x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CBNK or BWFG?
Over the past 5 years, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) delivered a total return of +96. 1%, compared to +48. 8% for Capital Bancorp, Inc. (CBNK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BWFG returned +178. 0% versus CBNK's +158. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CBNK or BWFG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus Capital Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 88β — meaning CBNK is approximately 4% more volatile than BWFG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Capital Bancorp, Inc. (CBNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 60% for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CBNK or BWFG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Capital Bancorp, Inc.
(CBNK) is pulling ahead at 25. 3% versus 6. 1% for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. grew EPS 261. 8% year-over-year, compared to 60. 4% for Capital Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CBNK or BWFG?
Capital Bancorp, Inc.
(CBNK) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 8% net margin versus 16. 9% for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BWFG leads at 23. 3% versus 23. 3% for CBNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBNK leads at 73. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CBNK or BWFG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 23x versus Capital Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 73x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Capital Bancorp, Inc. (CBNK) trades at 9. 3x forward P/E versus 9. 7x for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. — 0. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — CBNK or BWFG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) offers the highest yield at 1. 5%, versus 1. 4% for Capital Bancorp, Inc. (CBNK).
09Is CBNK or BWFG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84), 1. 5% yield, +178. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BWFG: +178. 0%, CBNK: +158. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CBNK and BWFG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CBNK is a small-cap high-growth stock; BWFG is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.