CBOE vs ICE

For growth investors, Cboe Global Markets, Inc.

(CBOE) is the stronger pick with 15. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 5% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) offers the better valuation at 26. 6x trailing P/E (19. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the cheapest at 26. 6x versus Cboe Global Markets, Inc. at 33. 1x. On forward P/E, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Cboe Global Markets, Inc. wins at 1. 41x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 2. 15x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Cboe Global Markets, Inc.

(CBOE) delivered a total return of +231. 6%, compared to +42. 4% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CBOE returned +473. 5% versus ICE's +222. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cboe Global Markets, Inc.

(CBOE) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 27β versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 0. 33β — meaning ICE is approximately -221% more volatile than CBOE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 70% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cboe Global Markets, Inc.

(CBOE) is pulling ahead at 15. 1% versus 7. 5% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cboe Global Markets, Inc. grew EPS 44. 5% year-over-year, compared to 20. 7% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus 23. 3% for Cboe Global Markets, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 32. 1% for CBOE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ICE leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 41x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 2. 15x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) trades at 19. 1x forward P/E versus 27. 5x for Cboe Global Markets, Inc. — 8. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 27. 6% to $195. 71.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) offers the highest yield at 1. 3%, versus 0. 8% for Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cboe Global Markets, Inc.

(CBOE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 27), 0. 8% yield, +473. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBOE: +473. 5%, ICE: +222. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CBOE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.