Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
CCBG logo
CCBG
SFBS logo
SFBS
NBTB logo
NBTB
HOMB logo
HOMB
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CCBG vs SFBS vs NBTB vs HOMB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CCBG
Capital City Bank Group, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$808M
5Y Perf.+124.9%
SFBS
ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.50B
5Y Perf.+130.4%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.52B
5Y Perf.+56.6%
HOMB
Home Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.58B
5Y Perf.+83.7%

CCBG vs SFBS vs NBTB vs HOMB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CCBG logoCCBG
SFBS logoSFBS
NBTB logoNBTB
HOMB logoHOMB
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$808M$4.50B$2.52B$5.58B
Revenue (TTM)$279M$1.02B$902M$1.37B
Net Income (TTM)$62M$277M$169M$475M
Gross Margin87.1%51.8%73.6%77.3%
Operating Margin30.0%33.6%24.3%43.8%
Forward P/E13.0x12.9x11.5x11.5x
Total Debt$93M$1.51B$327M$935M
Cash & Equiv.$62M$95M$185M$667M

CCBG vs SFBS vs NBTB vs HOMBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CCBG
SFBS
NBTB
HOMB
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Capital City Bank G… (CCBG)100224.9+124.9%
ServisFirst Bancsha… (SFBS)100230.4+130.4%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100156.6+56.6%
Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB)100183.7+83.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CCBG vs SFBS vs NBTB vs HOMB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CCBG and SFBS are tied at the top with 2 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. NBTB and HOMB also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CCBG
Capital City Bank Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CCBG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 257.8% 10Y total return vs SFBS's 260.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.56, Low D/E 16.9%, current ratio 1.24x
  • NIM 3.9% vs SFBS's 3.0%
  • Beta 0.56 vs SFBS's 1.06, lower leverage
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
SFBS
ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

SFBS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CCBG's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
  • Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CCBG's 0.6%
Best for: quality and efficiency
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.

  • Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
  • Beta 0.76, yield 3.0%, current ratio 1.60x
  • 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs HOMB's -5.3%
  • 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8%
Best for: growth exposure and defensive
HOMB
Home Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

HOMB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.8%
  • PEG 0.87 vs NBTB's 1.64
  • Lower P/E (11.5x vs 12.9x), PEG 0.87 vs 1.28
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNBTB logoNBTB10.4% NII/revenue growth vs HOMB's -5.3%
ValueHOMB logoHOMBLower P/E (11.5x vs 12.9x), PEG 0.87 vs 1.28
Quality / MarginsSFBS logoSFBSEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs CCBG's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyCCBG logoCCBGBeta 0.56 vs SFBS's 1.06, lower leverage
DividendsNBTB logoNBTB3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8%
Momentum (1Y)CCBG logoCCBG+27.9% vs HOMB's +3.0%
Efficiency (ROA)SFBS logoSFBSEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs CCBG's 0.6%

CCBG vs SFBS vs NBTB vs HOMB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CCBGCapital City Bank Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Deposit fees
29.7%$22M
Wealth management fees
27.8%$21M
Mortgage Banking Revenues
22.8%$17M
Bank card fees
19.8%$15M
SFBSServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Deposit Account
46.3%$12M
Credit Card
32.4%$8M
Mortgage Banking
21.3%$5M
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
HOMBHome Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Financial Service, Other
53.7%$47M
Deposit Account
46.3%$40M

CCBG vs SFBS vs NBTB vs HOMB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCCBGLAGGINGHOMB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — CCBG and HOMB each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

HOMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 4.9x CCBG's $279M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 34.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NBTB's 18.8%.

MetricCCBG logoCCBGCapital City Bank…SFBS logoSFBSServisFirst Bancs…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$279M$1.0B$902M$1.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$89M$346M$241M$618M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$62M$277M$169M$475M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$98M$351M$225M$311M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+87.1%+51.8%+73.6%+77.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+30.0%+33.6%+24.3%+43.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+22.0%+27.2%+18.8%+34.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+35.1%+34.5%+24.9%+22.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+20.8%+32.8%+39.5%+26.0%
Evenly matched — CCBG and HOMB each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — CCBG and HOMB each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 11.7x trailing earnings, HOMB trades at a 28% valuation discount to SFBS's 16.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HOMB offers better value at 0.89x vs NBTB's 2.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCCBG logoCCBGCapital City Bank…SFBS logoSFBSServisFirst Bancs…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …
Market CapShares × price$808M$4.5B$2.5B$5.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$839M$5.9B$2.7B$5.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS13.09x16.28x14.47x11.72x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.04x12.87x11.54x11.47x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.94x1.61x2.06x0.89x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.39x17.29x11.03x9.47x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.89x4.43x2.90x4.06x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.46x2.43x1.29x1.30x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.10x12.89x11.49x11.58x
Evenly matched — CCBG and HOMB each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CCBG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

SFBS delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $10 for NBTB. CCBG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SFBS's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SFBS scores 8/9 vs HOMB's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCCBG logoCCBGCapital City Bank…SFBS logoSFBSServisFirst Bancs…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.5%+15.8%+9.5%+11.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.4%+1.6%+1.1%+2.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+10.3%+7.3%+7.9%+8.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.4%+4.5%+2.4%+11.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–97876
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.17x0.81x0.17x0.22x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$31M$1.4B$142M$268M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$62M$95M$185M$667M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$93M$1.5B$327M$935M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.56x0.75x1.05x1.47x
CCBG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SFBS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CCBG five years ago would be worth $19,565 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,212 for HOMB. Over the past 12 months, CCBG leads with a +27.9% total return vs HOMB's +3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SFBS at 24.5% vs HOMB's 9.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCCBG logoCCBGCapital City Bank…SFBS logoSFBSServisFirst Bancs…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+12.6%+15.8%+17.6%+2.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+27.9%+12.8%+18.3%+3.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+55.7%+92.8%+48.5%+31.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+95.7%+27.6%+44.4%+22.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+257.8%+260.6%+108.5%+57.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+15.9%+24.5%+14.1%+9.5%
SFBS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CCBG and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CCBG is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFBS's 1.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs SFBS's 90.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCCBG logoCCBGCapital City Bank…SFBS logoSFBSServisFirst Bancs…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.56x1.06x0.76x0.66x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$48.78$90.64$48.27$30.83
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$35.94$67.20$39.20$25.50
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.6%+90.9%+99.8%+91.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.865.163.163.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded77K211K266K1.4M
Evenly matched — CCBG and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — NBTB and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CCBG as "Hold", SFBS as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.5% upside for HOMB (target: $32) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.96% vs SFBS's 1.62%.

MetricCCBG logoCCBGCapital City Bank…SFBS logoSFBSServisFirst Bancs…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$49.50$90.00$46.00$31.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts761019
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.1%+1.6%+3.0%+2.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1111315
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.00$1.34$1.43$0.80
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.4%+1.5%
Evenly matched — NBTB and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CCBG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). SFBS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.

Best OverallCapital City Bank Group, In… (CCBG)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CCBG vs SFBS vs NBTB vs HOMB: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CCBG or SFBS or NBTB or HOMB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 3% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (SFBS) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CCBG or SFBS or NBTB or HOMB?

On trailing P/E, Home Bancshares, Inc.

(HOMB) is the cheapest at 11. 7x versus ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. at 16. 3x. On forward P/E, Home Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Home Bancshares, Inc. wins at 0. 87x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CCBG or SFBS or NBTB or HOMB?

Over the past 5 years, Capital City Bank Group, Inc.

(CCBG) delivered a total return of +95. 7%, compared to +22. 1% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SFBS returned +260. 6% versus HOMB's +57. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CCBG or SFBS or NBTB or HOMB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Capital City Bank Group, Inc.

(CCBG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 06β — meaning SFBS is approximately 88% more volatile than CCBG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (CCBG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 81% for ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CCBG or SFBS or NBTB or HOMB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -5. 3% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 21. 6% year-over-year, compared to 12. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CCBG or SFBS or NBTB or HOMB?

Home Bancshares, Inc.

(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 34. 6% net margin versus 19. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc. — meaning it keeps 34. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 43. 8% versus 25. 3% for NBTB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCBG leads at 87. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CCBG or SFBS or NBTB or HOMB more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 87x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 13. 0x for Capital City Bank Group, Inc. — 1. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOMB: 11. 5% to $31. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CCBG or SFBS or NBTB or HOMB?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 1. 6% for ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (SFBS).

09

Is CCBG or SFBS or NBTB or HOMB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Capital City Bank Group, Inc.

(CCBG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), 2. 1% yield, +257. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CCBG: +257. 8%, SFBS: +260. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CCBG and SFBS and NBTB and HOMB?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.