Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CCGWW vs WDH vs ACMR vs LMND vs ROOT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CCGWW
Cheche Group Inc. Warrant

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$9M
5Y Perf.-89.5%
WDH
Waterdrop Inc.

Insurance - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • CN
Market Cap$595M
5Y Perf.+42.2%
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.92B
5Y Perf.+221.0%
LMND
Lemonade, Inc.

Insurance - Property & Casualty

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.18B
5Y Perf.+646.4%
ROOT
Root, Inc.

Insurance - Property & Casualty

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$798M
5Y Perf.+553.3%

CCGWW vs WDH vs ACMR vs LMND vs ROOT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CCGWW logoCCGWW
WDH logoWDH
ACMR logoACMR
LMND logoLMND
ROOT logoROOT
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationInsurance - DiversifiedSemiconductorsInsurance - Property & CasualtyInsurance - Property & Casualty
Market Cap$9M$595M$3.92B$4.18B$798M
Revenue (TTM)$3.47B$2.98B$901M$821M$1.56B
Net Income (TTM)$-61M$447M$94M$-139M$56M
Gross Margin4.6%41.2%44.4%47.6%17.9%
Operating Margin-1.9%8.5%12.1%-16.3%4.1%
Forward P/E8.8x29.7x29.0x
Total Debt$35M$244M$303M$182M$201M
Cash & Equiv.$117M$986M$766M$385M$690M

CCGWW vs WDH vs ACMR vs LMND vs ROOTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CCGWW
WDH
ACMR
LMND
ROOT
StockSep 23Feb 26Return
Cheche Group Inc. W… (CCGWW)10010.5-89.5%
Waterdrop Inc. (WDH)100142.2+42.2%
ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR)100321.0+221.0%
Lemonade, Inc. (LMND)100746.4+646.4%
Root, Inc. (ROOT)100653.3+553.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CCGWW vs WDH vs ACMR vs LMND vs ROOT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: WDH leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. ACM Research, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. LMND also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CCGWW
Cheche Group Inc. Warrant
The Technology Pick

CCGWW lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
WDH
Waterdrop Inc.
The Insurance Pick

WDH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.22, yield 3.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.22, Low D/E 5.0%, current ratio 3.12x
  • Beta 1.22, yield 3.9%, current ratio 3.12x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

ACMR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 30.7% 10Y total return vs LMND's -21.6%
  • +195.6% vs ROOT's -59.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
LMND
Lemonade, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

LMND ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.

  • 40.2% revenue growth vs CCGWW's 5.2%
Best for: growth
ROOT
Root, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

ROOT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 29.0%, EPS growth 22.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 69.6%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLMND logoLMND40.2% revenue growth vs CCGWW's 5.2%
ValueWDH logoWDHBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsWDH logoWDH15.0% margin vs LMND's -16.9%
Stability / SafetyWDH logoWDHBeta 1.22 vs ACMR's 3.24, lower leverage
DividendsWDH logoWDH3.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)ACMR logoACMR+195.6% vs ROOT's -59.3%
Efficiency (ROA)WDH logoWDH7.0% ROA vs LMND's -7.4%, ROIC 3.1% vs -36.8%

CCGWW vs WDH vs ACMR vs LMND vs ROOT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CCGWWCheche Group Inc. Warrant
FY 2023
Other Segments
100.0%$1M
WDHWaterdrop Inc.
FY 2024
Other Revenues
54.6%$49M
Technical Service Income
45.4%$41M
ACMRACM Research, Inc.
FY 2025
Total Single Wafer and Semi-Critical Cleaning Equipment
69.5%$626M
ECP Front End And Packaging Furnace And Other Technologies
22.1%$200M
Advanced Packaging (exclude ECP), Services & Spares
8.4%$76M
LMNDLemonade, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$738M
ROOTRoot, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CCGWW vs WDH vs ACMR vs LMND vs ROOT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLWDHLAGGINGROOT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — LMND and ROOT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

CCGWW is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 4.2x LMND's $821M. WDH is the more profitable business, keeping 15.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LMND's -16.9%. On growth, LMND holds the edge at +55.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCCGWW logoCCGWWCheche Group Inc.…WDH logoWDHWaterdrop Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.5B$3.0B$901M$821M$1.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$253M$126M-$121M$73M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$447M$94M-$139M$56M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0-$69M$20M$181M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+4.6%+41.2%+44.4%+47.6%+17.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-1.9%+8.5%+12.1%-16.3%+4.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-1.8%+15.0%+10.4%-16.9%+3.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.3%+7.9%-7.6%+2.4%+11.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+23.9%+9.4%+55.0%+12.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+66.7%-76.1%+45.3%+95.3%
Evenly matched — LMND and ROOT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — CCGWW and ROOT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 10.9x trailing earnings, WDH trades at a 75% valuation discount to ACMR's 43.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ROOT's 5.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACMR's 27.5x.

MetricCCGWW logoCCGWWCheche Group Inc.…WDH logoWDHWaterdrop Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$9M$595M$3.9B$4.2B$798M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$3M$486M$3.5B$4.0B$309M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS10.89x43.21x-23.67x25.41x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.79x29.68x29.04x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.22x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple17.25x27.49x5.88x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.02x1.46x4.35x5.67x0.53x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.18x0.83x2.06x7.33x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF18.51x4.15x
Evenly matched — CCGWW and ROOT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

WDH leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

ROOT delivers a 15.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-27 for LMND. WDH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ROOT's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WDH scores 7/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCCGWW logoCCGWWCheche Group Inc.…WDH logoWDHWaterdrop Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-16.7%+9.2%+6.1%-26.5%+15.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-5.6%+7.0%+3.9%-7.4%+3.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-22.8%+3.1%+7.0%-36.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-16.6%+3.7%+6.6%-22.7%+3.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–947246
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.10x0.05x0.16x0.34x0.51x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$82M-$742M-$463M-$203M-$489M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$117M$986M$766M$385M$690M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$35M$244M$303M$182M$201M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-79.41x20.44x1.86x
WDH leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ACMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ACMR five years ago would be worth $23,344 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for CCGWW. Over the past 12 months, ACMR leads with a +195.6% total return vs ROOT's -59.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ROOT at 117.4% vs CCGWW's -55.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCCGWW logoCCGWWCheche Group Inc.…WDH logoWDHWaterdrop Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-19.2%-14.5%+31.9%-28.3%-19.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-19.8%+29.8%+195.6%+78.2%-59.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.3%-40.6%+487.9%+234.7%+927.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.3%-82.2%+133.4%-31.2%-69.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.3%-82.2%+3065.8%-21.6%-88.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-55.6%-15.9%+80.5%+49.6%+117.4%
ACMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — WDH and ACMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

WDH is the less volatile stock with a 1.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACMR's 3.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACMR currently trades 82.6% from its 52-week high vs ROOT's 34.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCCGWW logoCCGWWCheche Group Inc.…WDH logoWDHWaterdrop Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.38x1.22x3.24x2.75x2.30x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$0.05$2.18$71.65$99.90$162.99
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.02$1.24$19.26$28.71$40.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+42.0%+73.4%+82.6%+54.5%+34.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.134.860.736.356.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded0207K1.2M1.9M330K
Evenly matched — WDH and ACMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — WDH and ACMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: WDH as "Buy", ACMR as "Buy", LMND as "Buy", ROOT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 33.5% upside for LMND (target: $73) vs -32.4% for ACMR (target: $40). For income investors, WDH offers the higher dividend yield at 3.92% vs ACMR's 0.19%.

MetricCCGWW logoCCGWWCheche Group Inc.…WDH logoWDHWaterdrop Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$2.00$40.00$72.67$75.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts3101514
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.9%+0.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises13
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.43$0.11
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.6%+0.2%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — WDH and ACMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

WDH leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). ACMR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.

Best OverallWaterdrop Inc. (WDH)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CCGWW vs WDH vs ACMR vs LMND vs ROOT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CCGWW or WDH or ACMR or LMND or ROOT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Lemonade, Inc.

(LMND) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 2% for Cheche Group Inc. Warrant (CCGWW). Waterdrop Inc. (WDH) offers the better valuation at 10. 9x trailing P/E (8. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Waterdrop Inc. (WDH) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CCGWW or WDH or ACMR or LMND or ROOT?

On trailing P/E, Waterdrop Inc.

(WDH) is the cheapest at 10. 9x versus ACM Research, Inc. at 43. 2x. On forward P/E, Waterdrop Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CCGWW or WDH or ACMR or LMND or ROOT?

Over the past 5 years, ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) delivered a total return of +133. 4%, compared to -91. 3% for Cheche Group Inc. Warrant (CCGWW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +30. 7% versus CCGWW's -91. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CCGWW or WDH or ACMR or LMND or ROOT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Waterdrop Inc.

(WDH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 22β versus ACM Research, Inc. 's 3. 24β — meaning ACMR is approximately 165% more volatile than WDH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Waterdrop Inc. (WDH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 51% for Root, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CCGWW or WDH or ACMR or LMND or ROOT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lemonade, Inc.

(LMND) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus 5. 2% for Cheche Group Inc. Warrant (CCGWW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Waterdrop Inc. grew EPS 132. 6% year-over-year, compared to -10. 5% for ACM Research, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROOT leads at 69. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CCGWW or WDH or ACMR or LMND or ROOT?

Waterdrop Inc.

(WDH) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 3% net margin versus -22. 4% for Lemonade, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACMR leads at 12. 1% versus -21. 8% for LMND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WDH leads at 52. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CCGWW or WDH or ACMR or LMND or ROOT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Waterdrop Inc.

(WDH) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 29. 7x for ACM Research, Inc. — 20. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LMND: 33. 5% to $72. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CCGWW or WDH or ACMR or LMND or ROOT?

In this comparison, WDH (3.

9% yield), ACMR (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. CCGWW, LMND, ROOT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CCGWW or WDH or ACMR or LMND or ROOT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Waterdrop Inc.

(WDH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 22), 3. 9% yield). Root, Inc. (ROOT) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WDH: -82. 2%, ROOT: -88. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CCGWW and WDH and ACMR and LMND and ROOT?

These companies operate in different sectors (CCGWW (Technology) and WDH (Financial Services) and ACMR (Technology) and LMND (Financial Services) and ROOT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CCGWW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WDH is a small-cap deep-value stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; LMND is a small-cap high-growth stock; ROOT is a small-cap high-growth stock. WDH pays a dividend while CCGWW, ACMR, LMND, ROOT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CCGWW

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WDH

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACMR

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LMND

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 27%
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ROOT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CCGWW and WDH and ACMR and LMND and ROOT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CCGWW: 5.2% · WDH: 23.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.