REIT - Specialty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CCI vs AMT vs SBAC vs UNIT vs LUMN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Specialty
REIT - Specialty
REIT - Specialty
Telecommunications Services
CCI vs AMT vs SBAC vs UNIT vs LUMN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Specialty | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $38.88B | $82.98B | $23.06B | $2.73B | $9.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.21B | $10.82B | $2.85B | $2.23B | $12.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.06B | $2.88B | $1.02B | $1.27B | $-1.74B |
| Gross Margin | 65.7% | 73.4% | 63.6% | 47.1% | 12.5% |
| Operating Margin | 48.0% | 44.2% | 47.6% | 21.2% | 2.6% |
| Forward P/E | 43.0x | 27.2x | 29.2x | 2.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $29.57B | $44.96B | $15.32B | $10.02B | $17.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $269M | $1.47B | $432M | $134M | $1.00B |
CCI vs AMT vs SBAC vs UNIT vs LUMN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crown Castle Inc. (CCI) | 100 | 51.8 | -48.2% |
| American Tower Corp… (AMT) | 100 | 69.0 | -31.0% |
| SBA Communications … (SBAC) | 100 | 69.2 | -30.8% |
| Uniti Group Inc. (UNIT) | 100 | 83.9 | -16.1% |
| Lumen Technologies,… (LUMN) | 100 | 93.9 | -6.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCI vs AMT vs SBAC vs UNIT vs LUMN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.26, yield 5.3%
- Beta 0.26, yield 5.3%, current ratio 0.26x
- 5.3% yield, vs AMT's 3.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
AMT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 113.0% 10Y total return vs SBAC's 138.2%
SBAC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.16, current ratio 0.49x
- PEG 0.25 vs AMT's 3.72
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.16 vs LUMN's 2.74
UNIT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 91.5%, EPS growth 6.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.6%
- 91.5% FFO/revenue growth vs CCI's -35.1%
- 56.8% margin vs LUMN's -14.3%
- 14.5% ROA vs LUMN's -5.3%, ROIC 5.2% vs -0.8%
LUMN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +118.2% vs AMT's -17.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 91.5% FFO/revenue growth vs CCI's -35.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 56.8% margin vs LUMN's -14.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.16 vs LUMN's 2.74 | |
| Dividends | 5.3% yield, vs AMT's 3.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +118.2% vs AMT's -17.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.5% ROA vs LUMN's -5.3%, ROIC 5.2% vs -0.8% |
CCI vs AMT vs SBAC vs UNIT vs LUMN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CCI vs AMT vs SBAC vs UNIT vs LUMN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LUMN leads in 2 of 6 categories
CCI leads 1 • UNIT leads 1 • AMT leads 0 • SBAC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LUMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.1B annually — 5.4x UNIT's $2.2B. UNIT is the more profitable business, keeping 56.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LUMN's -14.3%. On growth, UNIT holds the edge at +2.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.2B | $10.8B | $2.9B | $2.2B | $12.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.7B | $6.9B | $1.7B | $1.1B | $3.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $2.9B | $1.0B | $1.3B | -$1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.7B | $3.8B | $1.0B | -$460M | $5.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.7% | +73.4% | +63.6% | +47.1% | +12.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +48.0% | +44.2% | +47.6% | +21.2% | +2.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.1% | +26.6% | +35.7% | +56.8% | -14.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +64.7% | +34.9% | +35.7% | -20.6% | +44.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.8% | +6.8% | +5.9% | +2.1% | -8.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +132.1% | +76.9% | -14.7% | -10.5% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
LUMN leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.4x trailing earnings, UNIT trades at a 97% valuation discount to CCI's 87.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SBAC offers better value at 0.19x vs AMT's 4.53x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $38.9B | $83.0B | $23.1B | $2.7B | $9.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $68.2B | $126.5B | $37.9B | $12.6B | $26.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 87.35x | 33.05x | 22.18x | 2.36x | -5.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 42.99x | 27.18x | 29.22x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.53x | 0.19x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 24.63x | 18.22x | 20.55x | 11.07x | 10.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.12x | 7.80x | 8.19x | 1.22x | 0.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 8.07x | — | 8.06x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.52x | 21.93x | 21.62x | — | 25.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UNIT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UNIT delivers a 3.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-79 for LUMN. AMT carries lower financial leverage with a 4.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UNIT's 26.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMT scores 7/9 vs LUMN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +27.4% | — | +3.4% | -79.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.4% | +4.5% | +9.0% | +14.5% | -5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | +6.9% | +10.0% | +5.2% | -0.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.2% | +8.6% | +14.5% | +6.5% | -0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 4.34x | — | 26.35x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $29.3B | $43.5B | $14.9B | $9.9B | $16.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $269M | $1.5B | $432M | $134M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $29.6B | $45.0B | $15.3B | $10.0B | $17.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.17x | 3.99x | 3.65x | 0.79x | -1.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LUMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMT five years ago would be worth $8,426 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,417 for CCI. Over the past 12 months, LUMN leads with a +118.2% total return vs AMT's -17.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LUMN at 59.4% vs CCI's -3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.6% | +2.9% | +13.6% | +68.4% | +20.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.7% | -17.4% | -8.3% | +38.4% | +118.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.7% | +0.7% | -4.2% | +100.7% | +304.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.8% | -15.7% | -20.1% | -19.8% | -16.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.4% | +113.0% | +138.2% | -29.9% | -32.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.7% | +0.2% | -1.4% | +26.1% | +59.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMT and UNIT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMT is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LUMN's 2.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UNIT currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs AMT's 76.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.26x | -0.04x | 0.16x | 1.79x | 2.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $115.76 | $234.33 | $245.16 | $12.18 | $11.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $75.96 | $165.08 | $162.41 | $5.30 | $3.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.0% | +76.0% | +88.7% | +94.5% | +77.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.3 | 53.8 | 57.7 | 60.8 | 69.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 2.9M | 1.2M | 2.4M | 12.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CCI and AMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CCI as "Buy", AMT as "Buy", SBAC as "Buy", UNIT as "Hold", LUMN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.5% upside for AMT (target: $216) vs -23.3% for LUMN (target: $7). For income investors, CCI offers the higher dividend yield at 5.34% vs SBAC's 2.05%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $105.40 | $216.33 | $230.14 | $11.00 | $7.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 46 | 49 | 42 | 13 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.3% | +3.8% | +2.0% | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 11 | 7 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.76 | $6.73 | $4.45 | — | $0.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.4% | +2.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LUMN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). CCI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
CCI vs AMT vs SBAC vs UNIT vs LUMN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCI or AMT or SBAC or UNIT or LUMN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Uniti Group Inc.
(UNIT) is the stronger pick with 91. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 1% for Crown Castle Inc. (CCI). Uniti Group Inc. (UNIT) offers the better valuation at 2. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Crown Castle Inc. (CCI) a "Buy" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCI or AMT or SBAC or UNIT or LUMN?
On trailing P/E, Uniti Group Inc.
(UNIT) is the cheapest at 2. 4x versus Crown Castle Inc. at 87. 4x. On forward P/E, American Tower Corporation is actually cheaper at 27. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SBA Communications Corporation wins at 0. 25x versus American Tower Corporation's 3. 72x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCI or AMT or SBAC or UNIT or LUMN?
Over the past 5 years, American Tower Corporation (AMT) delivered a total return of -15.
7%, compared to -35. 8% for Crown Castle Inc. (CCI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBAC returned +138. 2% versus LUMN's -32. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCI or AMT or SBAC or UNIT or LUMN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
04β versus Lumen Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 74β — meaning LUMN is approximately -7411% more volatile than AMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Tower Corporation (AMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 26% for Uniti Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CCI or AMT or SBAC or UNIT or LUMN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Uniti Group Inc.
(UNIT) is pulling ahead at 91. 5% versus -35. 1% for Crown Castle Inc. (CCI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Uniti Group Inc. grew EPS 660. 9% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UNIT leads at 25. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCI or AMT or SBAC or UNIT or LUMN?
Uniti Group Inc.
(UNIT) is the more profitable company, earning 58. 4% net margin versus -14. 0% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 58. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCI leads at 48. 7% versus -1. 5% for LUMN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMT leads at 73. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCI or AMT or SBAC or UNIT or LUMN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus American Tower Corporation's 3. 72x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, American Tower Corporation (AMT) trades at 27. 2x forward P/E versus 43. 0x for Crown Castle Inc. — 15. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMT: 21. 5% to $216. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCI or AMT or SBAC or UNIT or LUMN?
In this comparison, CCI (5.
3% yield), AMT (3. 8% yield), SBAC (2. 0% yield) pay a dividend. UNIT, LUMN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CCI or AMT or SBAC or UNIT or LUMN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
04), 3. 8% yield, +113. 0% 10Y return). Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) carries a higher beta of 2. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMT: +113. 0%, LUMN: -32. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCI and AMT and SBAC and UNIT and LUMN?
These companies operate in different sectors (CCI (Real Estate) and AMT (Real Estate) and SBAC (Real Estate) and UNIT (Real Estate) and LUMN (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CCI is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; AMT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; SBAC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; UNIT is a small-cap high-growth stock; LUMN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CCI, AMT, SBAC pay a dividend while UNIT, LUMN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.