REIT - Specialty
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CCI vs TMUS vs VZ vs AMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
REIT - Specialty
CCI vs TMUS vs VZ vs AMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Specialty | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | REIT - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $38.88B | $210.32B | $199.66B | $82.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.21B | $90.53B | $138.19B | $10.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.06B | $10.54B | $17.17B | $2.88B |
| Gross Margin | 65.7% | 54.3% | 55.7% | 73.4% |
| Operating Margin | 48.0% | 20.4% | 21.2% | 44.2% |
| Forward P/E | 43.0x | 18.5x | 9.6x | 27.2x |
| Total Debt | $29.57B | $122.27B | $200.59B | $44.96B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $269M | $5.60B | $19.05B | $1.47B |
CCI vs TMUS vs VZ vs AMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crown Castle Inc. (CCI) | 100 | 51.8 | -48.2% |
| T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) | 100 | 194.3 | +94.3% |
| Verizon Communicati… (VZ) | 100 | 82.5 | -17.5% |
| American Tower Corp… (AMT) | 100 | 69.0 | -31.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCI vs TMUS vs VZ vs AMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
TMUS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 8.5%, EPS growth 0.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.5%
- 415.9% 10Y total return vs AMT's 113.0%
- PEG 0.62 vs AMT's 3.72
- 8.5% revenue growth vs CCI's -35.1%
VZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta -0.11, yield 5.7%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.11, current ratio 0.91x
- Beta -0.11, yield 5.7%, current ratio 0.91x
- Lower P/E (9.6x vs 27.2x)
AMT is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 26.6% margin vs TMUS's 11.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.5% revenue growth vs CCI's -35.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 27.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.6% margin vs TMUS's 11.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (189.7% vs 434.2%) | |
| Dividends | 5.7% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs AMT's 3.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.1% vs TMUS's -20.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.9% ROA vs CCI's 3.4%, ROIC 8.1% vs 5.5% |
CCI vs TMUS vs VZ vs AMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CCI vs TMUS vs VZ vs AMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VZ leads in 3 of 6 categories
CCI leads 1 • TMUS leads 1 • AMT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $138.2B annually — 32.8x CCI's $4.2B. AMT is the more profitable business, keeping 26.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TMUS's 11.6%. On growth, TMUS holds the edge at +10.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.2B | $90.5B | $138.2B | $10.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.7B | $29.9B | $47.6B | $6.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $10.5B | $17.2B | $2.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.7B | $10.7B | $19.8B | $3.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.7% | +54.3% | +55.7% | +73.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +48.0% | +20.4% | +21.2% | +44.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.1% | +11.6% | +12.4% | +26.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +64.7% | +11.8% | +14.3% | +34.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.8% | +10.6% | +2.0% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +132.1% | -12.0% | -53.4% | +76.9% |
Valuation Metrics
VZ leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.7x trailing earnings, VZ trades at a 87% valuation discount to CCI's 87.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TMUS offers better value at 0.67x vs AMT's 4.53x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $38.9B | $210.3B | $199.7B | $83.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $68.2B | $327.0B | $381.2B | $126.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 87.35x | 19.99x | 11.66x | 33.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 42.99x | 18.46x | 9.57x | 27.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.67x | — | 4.53x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 24.63x | 10.14x | 8.01x | 18.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.12x | 2.38x | 1.44x | 7.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 3.71x | 1.89x | 8.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.52x | 20.33x | 9.92x | 21.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TMUS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT delivers a 27.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $16 for VZ. VZ carries lower financial leverage with a 1.90x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMT's 4.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMT scores 7/9 vs VZ's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +17.8% | +16.4% | +27.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.4% | +4.9% | +4.4% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | +8.1% | +8.0% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.2% | +9.8% | +8.8% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.07x | 1.90x | 4.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $29.3B | $116.7B | $181.5B | $43.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $269M | $5.6B | $19.0B | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $29.6B | $122.3B | $200.6B | $45.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.17x | 5.33x | 4.39x | 3.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VZ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TMUS five years ago would be worth $15,098 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,417 for CCI. Over the past 12 months, VZ leads with a +15.1% total return vs TMUS's -20.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VZ at 13.6% vs CCI's -3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.6% | -2.1% | +20.3% | +2.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.7% | -20.2% | +15.1% | -17.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.7% | +41.1% | +46.6% | +0.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.8% | +51.0% | +3.2% | -15.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.4% | +415.9% | +42.8% | +113.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.7% | +12.2% | +13.6% | +0.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TMUS and VZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TMUS is the less volatile stock with a -0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CCI's 0.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VZ currently trades 91.6% from its 52-week high vs TMUS's 74.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.26x | -0.28x | -0.11x | -0.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $115.76 | $261.56 | $51.68 | $234.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $75.96 | $181.36 | $10.60 | $165.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.0% | +74.3% | +91.6% | +76.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.3 | 46.9 | 50.1 | 53.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 5.7M | 24.5M | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
VZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CCI as "Buy", TMUS as "Buy", VZ as "Hold", AMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.7% upside for TMUS (target: $254) vs 8.9% for VZ (target: $52). For income investors, VZ offers the higher dividend yield at 5.73% vs TMUS's 1.87%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $105.40 | $254.08 | $51.56 | $216.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 46 | 54 | 60 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.3% | +1.9% | +5.7% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 11 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.76 | $3.64 | $2.71 | $6.73 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +4.7% | 0.0% | +0.4% |
VZ leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). CCI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
CCI vs TMUS vs VZ vs AMT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCI or TMUS or VZ or AMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, T-Mobile US, Inc.
(TMUS) is the stronger pick with 8. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 1% for Crown Castle Inc. (CCI). Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Crown Castle Inc. (CCI) a "Buy" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCI or TMUS or VZ or AMT?
On trailing P/E, Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is the cheapest at 11. 7x versus Crown Castle Inc. at 87. 4x. On forward P/E, Verizon Communications Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: T-Mobile US, Inc. wins at 0. 62x versus American Tower Corporation's 3. 72x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCI or TMUS or VZ or AMT?
Over the past 5 years, T-Mobile US, Inc.
(TMUS) delivered a total return of +51. 0%, compared to -35. 8% for Crown Castle Inc. (CCI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TMUS returned +415. 9% versus VZ's +42. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCI or TMUS or VZ or AMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), T-Mobile US, Inc.
(TMUS) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 28β versus Crown Castle Inc. 's 0. 26β — meaning CCI is approximately -194% more volatile than TMUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 190% versus 4% for American Tower Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CCI or TMUS or VZ or AMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), T-Mobile US, Inc.
(TMUS) is pulling ahead at 8. 5% versus -35. 1% for Crown Castle Inc. (CCI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Crown Castle Inc. grew EPS 111. 4% year-over-year, compared to -2. 2% for Verizon Communications Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TMUS leads at 3. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCI or TMUS or VZ or AMT?
American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
8% net margin versus 10. 4% for Crown Castle Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCI leads at 48. 7% versus 21. 2% for VZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMT leads at 73. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCI or TMUS or VZ or AMT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus American Tower Corporation's 3. 72x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 43. 0x for Crown Castle Inc. — 33. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TMUS: 30. 7% to $254. 08.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCI or TMUS or VZ or AMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) offers the highest yield at 5. 7%, versus 1. 9% for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS).
09Is CCI or TMUS or VZ or AMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, T-Mobile US, Inc.
(TMUS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 28), 1. 9% yield, +415. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TMUS: +415. 9%, CCI: +58. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCI and TMUS and VZ and AMT?
These companies operate in different sectors (CCI (Real Estate) and TMUS (Communication Services) and VZ (Communication Services) and AMT (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CCI is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; TMUS is a large-cap quality compounder stock; VZ is a mid-cap deep-value stock; AMT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.